Early and Late Compressive Strengths Behaviour of Concrete with Blended South African Extenders

Article Preview

Abstract:

The use of different supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) has attracted the interest of researchers for years. These materials have their advantages and dis-advantages. The optimal use of these SCMs in concrete may call for blending them together in concrete instead of using them individually. The blend may increase their quality as one disadvantages may be catered for by another one advantages. The present study focusses on investigating the effect of proportional combination of these SCMs on strength development. Three different South African SCMs (Ground granulated blast-furnace slag, Silica fume and Fly ash) were blended at different proportions and used as replacement of cement in concrete. Compressive strength test based on SANS 5860:2006 standard were adopted. The compressive test was performed on 16 different mixes at 7, 14, 28, 90 and 120 days curing periods. The water/cement ratio for all the mix was maintained at 0.5. The compressive strength results are desirable for each curing age at the 30% replacement of cement in which each SCM contributes 10% to the mix, greater strength value at curing age beyond 120 days compared to control sample was envisaged for this sample.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

302-308

Citation:

Online since:

May 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Potgieter J.H. An overview of cement production: How green" and sustainable is the industry, Environmental Management and sustainable development ISSN 2164-7682 Vol. 1 (2) (2012).

DOI: 10.5296/emsd.v1i2.1872

Google Scholar

[2] H. Toutanji, N. Delatte and S. Aggoun, Effect of Supplementary cementitious materials on the compressive strength and durability of short-term cured concrete. Cleveland State University, Civil and Environmental engineering faculty publications, (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.08.017

Google Scholar

[3] G.K. Glass, B. Reddy and N.R. Buenfeld, Corrosion inhibition in concrete arising from its acid neutralisation capacity. Corrosion Science Vol. 42 (2000), p.1587 – 1598.

DOI: 10.1016/s0010-938x(00)00008-1

Google Scholar

[4] A. Cheng, R. Huang, J. Wu and C. Chen, Influence of GGBS on durability and corrosion behavior of reinforced concrete. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2005 Vol. 93(2005), p.404 – 411.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.03.043

Google Scholar

[5] B.D. Ikotun, G.C. Fanourakis and S. Mishra, Effect of fly ash-ß-cyclodextrin composites on concrete properties. Proceedings of the first International Conference on Construction Materials and Structures ISBN 978-1-61499-465-7, 825-834, (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.12.008

Google Scholar

[6] A.R. Boga and I.B. Topcu, Influence of fly ash on corrosion resistance and chloride ion permeability of concrete. Construction and Building Materials Vol.31 (2012), pp.258-264.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.106

Google Scholar

[7] P. Chindaprasirit, C. Chotithanorm and V. Sirivivatnanon, Influence of fly ash fineness on the chloride penetration of concrete, Construction Building Materials Vol. 21 (2007), pp.356-361.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.010

Google Scholar

[8] S. Muralidharan and KW. Park, Accelerated short-term techniques to evaluate the corrosion performance of steel in fly ash blended concrete, Building Environment Vol. 42 (2007), pp.78-85.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.08.019

Google Scholar

[9] G. Owens. Fulton's concrete technology. Cement & concrete institute, Midrand, SA, (2009).

Google Scholar

[10] D. Suresh and K. Nagaraju, Ground Granulated Blast Slag (GGBS) In Concrete – A Review. Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) Vol.12(4) (2015), pp.76-82.

Google Scholar

[11] SANS 50197-1:2013 South African National Standard. Cement Part 1: Composition, Specification and conformity criteria for common cements ISBN 978-0-626-28152-6.

Google Scholar

[12] SANS 50450-1:2014/EN 450-1:2012 South African National Standard Part 1-3:2014 ISBN 978-0-626-299002.

Google Scholar

[13] SANS 201:2008 South African National Standard, Sieve analysis, fines content and dust content of aggregates ISBN 978-0-626-30212-2.

Google Scholar

[14] SANS 2001-1:2007/EN 1008:2002, South African National Standard, Construction works Part CC1: Concrete works (Structural) ISBN 978-0-626-19218-1.

Google Scholar

[15] P. Dinakar, K.G. Babu, M. Santhanam, Corrosion behaviour of blended cements in low and medium strength concretes, Cement & Concrete Composites Vol 29 (2007), pp.136-145.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.10.005

Google Scholar

[16] E.E. Berry, V.M. Malhotra, Fly ash for use in concrete – a critical review. Journal of American concrete institute 1980, 77 (2) 54-73.

Google Scholar

[17] J.W. Meusel and J.H. Ros. Production of granulated blast furnace slag at sparrows and the workability and strength. Proceedings of the potential of concrete incorporating the slag and other mineral by-products in concrete, SP-79, Detroit: ACI; 1983, 867-90.

DOI: 10.14359/6075

Google Scholar

[18] SANS 5860:2006 South African National Standard, Concrete tests – Dimensions, tolerances and uses of cast test samples, ISBN 978-0-626-27109-1.

Google Scholar

[19] SANS 5861-1:2006 Concrete tests, Part 1: Mixing fresh concrete in the laboratory, ISBN 978-0-626-27128-2. Edition 2.1.

Google Scholar

[20] SANS 5862-1:2006, Concrete tests-consistence of freshly mixed concrete – slump test, Pretoria: South Africa Bureau of Standards.

Google Scholar

[21] SANS 5863:2006 South African National Standard Concrete tests – compressive strength of hardened concrete ISBN 978-0-626-27125-1.

Google Scholar

[22] EN 12390-4 Eurocode Standard on compressive strength – specification for testing machines.

Google Scholar

[23] A.O. Emmanuel, F.A. Oladipo and O.E. Ogunsanmi. Investigation of Salinity Effect on Compressive Strength of Reinforced Concrete. Journal of Sustainable Development Vol. 5(6) (2012), pp.74-82.

DOI: 10.5539/jsd.v5n6p74

Google Scholar