Corrosion Properties of ECAP Titanium with Bioactive Oxide Coating in Physiological Solution

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper aims to comparison of corrosion properties of two titanium alloys with different grain size. These alloys are commonly used in implantology for manufacturing long term body hard tissues replacements. Surfaces of tested samples were also electrochemically anodized using fluorine ions rich environment: the main reason for anodization was to create surfaces with highly bioactive properties which can intensify healing process and result into better bonding between body tissues when they are used in implantology. It was found by direct electrochemical methods that difference of corrosion rate between anodized and non-anodized samples was not significant. Anodization results positively influenced decreasing of corrosion rate when samples were tested in aerated physiological solution (0,9 wt. % NaCl/water). Type of bonding between implant and surrounding tissue may be also predetermined by value of contact angle of tested sample and water droplet on its surface. This paper confirmed that anodization increases wettability of tested samples and lower the contact angle to ~60°. According to these results anodization process may be recommended as a profitable treatment for surfaces of tissue replacements made from titanium.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

52-57

Citation:

Online since:

July 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. J. García, Surface Modification of Biomaterials, Principles of Regenerative Medicine (2011) 663–673.

Google Scholar

[2] D. Guan, C. Cai, and Y. Wang, "Amorphous and crystalline TiO2 nanotube arrays for enhanced Li-ion intercalation properties., J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 11, (2011) 3641–3650.

DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2011.3765

Google Scholar

[3] Z. J. Liu, X. Zhong, J. Walton, and G. E. Thompson, "Anodic Film Growth of Titanium Oxide Using the 3-Electrode Electrochemical Technique: Effects of Oxygen Evolution and Morphological Characterizations, J. Electrochem. Soc., 163 (2016), E75–E82.

DOI: 10.1149/2.0181603jes

Google Scholar

[4] T. Monetta, A. Acquesta, A. Carangelo, and F. Bellucci, TiO2 Nanotubes on Ti Dental Implant. Part 1: Formation and Aging in Hank's Solution, Metals (Basel)., 7 (2017), 167-169.

DOI: 10.3390/met7050167

Google Scholar

[5] J. Hlinka, S. Lasek, and N. Faisal, Corrosion properties of anodized titanium, Acta Metall. Slovaca, 23 (2017), 270–275.

DOI: 10.12776/ams.v23i3.982

Google Scholar

[6] Z. Shi, M. Liu, and A. Atrens, Measurement of the corrosion rate of magnesium alloys using Tafel extrapolation, Corros. Sci., 52 (2010), 579–588.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2009.10.016

Google Scholar

[7] K. H. Park et al., Osseointegration of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages: A rabbit study, J. Oral Rehabil., 34 (2007) 517–527.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01688.x

Google Scholar

[8] S. L. De Assis, S. Wolynec, and I. Costa, Corrosion characterization of titanium alloys by electrochemical techniques, Electrochimica Acta (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.02.121

Google Scholar

[9] K. S. Raja, M. Misra, and K. Paramguru, Formation of self-ordered nano-tubular structure of anodic oxide layer on titanium, Electrochim. Acta (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.04.011

Google Scholar

[10] R. Bhola, S. M. Bhola, B. Mishra, and D. L. Olson, Corrosion in titanium dental implants/prostheses - A review, Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs (2011).

Google Scholar