AE Characterization of Brick Masonry Walls Mechanical Behavior: The Case-Study of Alessandria and Boves Barracks

Abstract:

IIn the present study, Acoustic Emission (AE) monitoring technique is applied in order to characterize the brick masonry of two important military buildings located in Northern Italy: the barracks of Alessandria and Boves. The internal brick masonry walls of the two barracks object of the study are tested by two double flat-jack systems, in order to analyze the compressive strength of the structural material. Flat-jack testing is a versatile and powerful technique that provides significant information on the mechanical properties of historical constructions. The first applications of this technique on some historical monuments clearly showed its great potential. The flat-jack test method is only slightly destructive, and when double jacks are used, this test works according to the same principle as a standard compressive test. The difference is that it is performed in situ and the load is applied by means of two flat-jacks instead of the loading platens. During the tests, the stress-strain relationship of the masonry is determined by gradually increasing the pressure applied by the flat-jacks in the course of three loading-unloading cycles. Moreover, AE technique is coupled to the flat-jack testing, in order to assess the extent of damage in the masonry texture. Thus, AE technique makes it possible to highlight critical phenomena and fracture mechanics scale effects in the masonry by identifying the critical conditions, not entrusted to an analysis of the loading process (compression or shear), rather depending primarily on the distribution and evolution of crack patterns.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 817)
• Pages: 563-570
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.817.563
• Online since: August 2019
• Authors: Nicola Viale, Federico Accornero*, Giuseppe Lacidogna, Giulio Ventura
• Keywords: Acoustic Emission, Damage Analysis, Emitted Energy, Flat-Jack Test, Kaiser Effect, Masonry Structure, Non-Destructive Monitoring

References

[1] A. Carpinteri, G. Lacidogna, Damage evaluation of three masonry towers by Acoustic Emission, Engineering Structures, 2007, 29:1569-1579.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.08.008

[2] A. Carpinteri, G. Lacidogna, N. Pugno, Structural damage diagnosis and life-time assessment by acoustic emission monitoring, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2007, 74:273-289.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.036

[3] A. Carpinteri, G. Lacidogna, F. Accornero, A. Mpalaskas, T. Matikas, D. Aggelis, Influence of damage in the Acoustic Emission parameters, Cement and Concrete Composites, 2013, 44:9-16.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.08.001

[4] G. Lacidogna, F. Accornero, A. Carpinteri, Masonry structures, in Innovative AE and NDT Techniques for On-site Measurement of Concrete and Masonry Structures (RILEM), Chapter 3, Ed. M. Ohtsu, Springer, Heidelberg, 2016, 27-46.

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-7606-6_3

[5] A. Carpinteri, G. Lacidogna, G. Niccolini, Time series analysis of acoustic emissions in the Asinelli tower during local seismic activity, Applied Sciences, 2018, 8(7), 1012.

DOI: 10.3390/app8071012

[6] A. Anzani, L. Binda, A. Carpinteri, G. Lacidogna, A. Manuello, Evaluation of the repair on multiple leaf stone masonry by acoustic emission, Materials and Structures, 2008, 41(6)1169-1189.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-007-9316-z

[7] C.U. Grosse, M. Ohtsu, Acoustic Emission Testing, Springer, Heidelberg, (2008).

[8] M. Ohtsu, The history and development of acoustic emission in concrete engineering, Magazine of Concrete Research, 1996, 48:321-330.

DOI: 10.1680/macr.1996.48.177.321

[9] A. Carpinteri, G. Lacidogna, Damage monitoring of an historical masonry building by the acoustic emission technique, Materials and Structures, 2006, 39:161-167.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-005-9043-2

[10] A. Carpinteri, G. Lacidogna, Structural monitoring and integrity assessment of medieval towers, Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE), 2006,132:1681-1690.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2006)132:11(1681)

[11] ASTM International. C1197-14a, Standard Test Method for In Situ Measurement of Masonry Deformability Properties Using the Flat jack Method, ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, (2014).

[12] RILEM TC 177-MDT. Masonry durability and on site testing D.5. In situ stress-strain behavior test based on the flat-jack. Mater. Struct. 2004, 37, 497–501.

DOI: 10.1617/14120

[13] N. Viale, G. Ventura. A New Experimental Test for the Characterisation of Masonry Shear Parameters, Proceedings 2018,2,464.

[14] P.P. Rossi, Prove distruttive e non distruttive per la caratterizzazione meccanica dei materiali. ISMES Bollettino, 1980,130.

[15] L. Binda, C. Tiraboschi, Flat-jack test as a slightly destructive technique for the diagnosis of brick and stone masonry structures, Int. Journal for Restoration of Buildings and Monuments 1999:449-472.

DOI: 10.1515/rbm-1999-5404

[16] G. Lacidogna, F. Accornero, A. Carpinteri, Influence of snap-back instabilities on Acoustic Emission damage monitoring, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2018,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.06.042

[17] D. Aggelis, T. Matikas, Effect of plate wave dispersion on the acoustic emission parameters in metals, Computers and Structures, 2012, 98:17-22.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.01.014

[18] R. Royles, Acoustic Emission monitoring of masonry arche bridges, British Journal of NDT, 1991,33:339-342.

[19] V.J. Kaiser, Knowledge and research on noise measurements during the tensile stressing of metals, Archiv für das Eisenhüttenwesen, 1953, 24:43-44.

[20] A. Carpinteri, F. Accornero, Multiple snap-back instabilities in progressive microcracking coalescenc", Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2018, 187:272-281.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.11.034

[21] A. Carpinteri, G. Lacidogna, F. Accornero, Fluctuations of 1/f noise in damaging structures analyzed by Acoustic Emission, Applied Sciences, 2018, 8:1685.

DOI: 10.3390/app8091685

[22] G. Lacidogna, F. Accornero, Elastic, plastic, fracture analysis of masonry arches: A multi-span bridge case study, Curved and Layered Structures, 2018, 5:1-9.

DOI: 10.1515/cls-2018-0001