A Bibliographic Historical Analysis on Geopolymer as a Substitute for Portland Cement

Article Preview

Abstract:

Growing concern about environmental degradation has expanded the search for new technologies that could ensure sustainable development. In civil construction, new materials have emerged as alternatives to reduce the impact of the activity on the environment, one of them is the geopolymer. This material, which can be characterized as a stable and synthesized composite of aluminosilicate materials, has emerged as a potential substitute for Portland cement because it presents similar characteristics of initial strength and good mechanical performance, but without the high emission of carbon dioxide (CO2) to obtaining it. This work brings a bibliographic analysis on geopolymer, it is intended to disseminate knowledge as of the state of the art on geopolymer as cement substitute.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

127-131

Citation:

Online since:

March 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] BUCHWALD, A; ZELLMANN, H.-D; KAPS, C.; Condensation of Aluminosilicate Gels: model system for geopolymer binders. Journal of NonCrystalline Solids, v. 357, n. 5, pp.1376-1382, (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.12.036

Google Scholar

[2] DAVIDOVITS, Joseph. 30 Years of Successes and Failures in Geopolymer Applications. Market Trends and Potential Breakthroughs. Geopolymer 2002 Conference, pp.1-9. Saint-Quentin, France, (2002).

Google Scholar

[3] KRIVENKO, Pavel. Alkali-Activated Aluminosilicates: past, present and future. Chemické Listy, v. 102, p. s265-s277, (2008).

Google Scholar

[4] DUXON, P.; FERNANDEZ-JIMENEZ, A.; PROVIS, J.L.; LUKEY, G.C.; PALOMO, A.; VAN DEVENTER, J.S.J. Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. Journal of Materials Science, 42:2917-2933. Australia, (2007).

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z

Google Scholar

[5] DAVIDOVITS, Joseph. From ancient concrete to geopolymers. Arts et Metiers Magazine, n.180, pp.8-16, Saint-Quentin., (1993).

Google Scholar

[6] DAVIDOVITS, Joseph. Ancient and Modern Concretes: What is the Real Difference. Concrete International, Vol. 9, n. 12, pp.23-35, (1987).

Google Scholar

[7] LIVI, Carolina Noda. Desenvolvimento de pasta de geopolímeros a base de cinza volante e hidróxido de sódio. Brazil, (2013).

Google Scholar

[8] SINDICATO NACIONAL DA INDÚSTRIA DO CIMENTO - SNIC. Resultados preliminares. Available on: <http://snic.org.br/numeros-resultados-preliminares-ver.php?id=20>. Access on: 24 July (2018).

Google Scholar

[9] WORLD BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT – WBCSD. Guidelines for Emissions Monitoring and Reporting in the Cement Industry. Sweden, (2012).

Google Scholar

[10] WORLD BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT – WBCSD. Global Cement Database on CO₂ and Energy Information. Available on: <https://www.wbcsdcement.org/index.php/key-issues/climate-protection/gnr-database>. Access on: July (2018).

Google Scholar

[11] DAVIDOVITS, Joseph. Properties of Geopolymer Cements. Geopolymer Institute, Alkaline Cements and Concretes. Ukraine, (1994).

Google Scholar

[12] BAKHAREV, Tanya. Resistance of Geopolymer Materials to Acid Attack. Cement and Concrete Research, v. 35, pp.658-670. United States, (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.005

Google Scholar

[13] GIANNOPOULOU, Ioanna; PANIAS, Dimitrios. Structure, Design and Applications of Geopolymeric Materials. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Deformation Processing and Structure of Materials. Serbia, (2007).

Google Scholar