Research on the Contaminants Adsorption and Removal by Macroporous Resins in the Textile and Dyeing

Article Preview

Abstract:

Textile and dyeing wastewater is the major source of environmental water pollution all over the world, which has complex composition so that conventional methods are difficult to remove and degrade. Based on the relevant research, this paper proposes to add further treatment by using macroporous resins on the basic of the conventional treatment and explore the effects of the adsorption and desorption, such as the pH value, initial concentration of , temperature and the flow rate. The performance of six kinds of macroporous resins (DA-2, D280, DA201, D3520, AB-8 and DA-201) for the advanced treatment in the textile and dyeing wastewater has been evaluated. The adsorption and desorption properties of the contaminants, which tested by the six kinds of the macroporous resins in the textile and dyeing, have been compared. According to the results, D3520 resin holds the highest adsorption and desorption capacity. (15.6mg/g for adsorption capacity, 15.1mg/g for desorption capacity). The effects of the pH value, initial concentration of , temperature and the flow rate on removal of by D3520 macroporous resin have been tested. The results showed that the removal of increased with the pH value and initial concentration of COD increasing and the data of its adsorption fitted the Langmuir isotherm best. Besides, 92.49% could be removed after 8h of adsorption at 25 °C. Dynamic adsorption and desorption experiments have been carried out on the packed column of D3520 resins as a reference for engineering applications, the results showed that the D3520 resin could still reach 79.5% removal rate after adsorptions-regeneration for five times.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

32-40

Citation:

Online since:

July 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Marcucci M, Nosenzo G, Capannelli G, et al. Treatment and reuse of textile effluents based on new ultrafiltration and other membrane technologies ☆[J]. Desalination, 2001, 138(1):75-82.

DOI: 10.1016/s0011-9164(01)00247-8

Google Scholar

[2] Pinheiro H M, Touraud E, Thomas O. Aromatic amines from azo dye reduction: status review with emphasis on direct UV spectrophotometric detection in textile industry wastewaters[J]. Dyes & Pigments, 2004, 61(2):121-139.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2003.10.009

Google Scholar

[3] Kumar P, Prasad B, Mishra I M, et al. Decolorization and COD reduction of dyeing wastewater from a cotton textile mill using thermolysis and coagulation[J]. J Hazard Mater. 2008, 153(1-2):635-645.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.007

Google Scholar

[4] Anjaneyulu Y, Chary N S, Raj D S S. Decolourization of Industrial Effluents – Available Methods and Emerging Technologies – A Review[J]. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 2005, 4(4):245-273.

DOI: 10.1007/s11157-005-1246-z

Google Scholar

[5] Haberkamp J, Ernst M, Böckelmann U, et al. Complexity of ultrafiltration membrane fouling caused by macromolecular dissolved organic compounds in secondary effluents.[J]. 2008, 42(12):3153-3161.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.03.007

Google Scholar

[6] Parmar V.S, Jain R, Simonsen O, et al. Synthesis and Characterization of Strong Polar Macroporous Resin Made from Cellulose[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 346(18):743-750.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.346.743

Google Scholar

[7] Ryy C, Beuchat L R. Immobilization of papain on an anion exchange resin by physical adsorption followed by cross linking with glutaraldehyde.[J]. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 2007, 11(2):163-176.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4514.1987.tb00120.x

Google Scholar

[8] Silva E M,Pompeu D R,Larondelle Y, et al. Optimisation of the adsorption of polyphenols from Inga edulis, leaves on macroporous resins using an experimental design methodology[J]. Separation & Purification Technology, 2007, 53(3):274-280.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2006.07.012

Google Scholar

[9] Abburi K.Adsorption of phenol and p -chlorophenol from their single and bisolute aqueous solutions on Amberlite XAD-16 resin[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2004, 105(1-3):143-156.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2003.08.004

Google Scholar

[10] Iqbal M J,Ashiq M N. Adsorption of dyes from aqueous solutions on activated charcoal.[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007, 139(1):57-66.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.007

Google Scholar

[11] Carmo A M,And L S H,Thompson M L. Sorption of Hydrophobic Organic Compounds by Soil Materials:  Application of Unit Equivalent Freundlich Coefficients[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 34(20):4363-4369.

DOI: 10.1021/es000968v

Google Scholar

[12] Teo W K,Ruthven D M. ChemInform Abstract: Adsorption of Water from Aqueous Ethanol Using 3‐Å Molecular‐Sieves.[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design & Development, 1986, 25(1):no-no.

DOI: 10.1002/chin.198624340

Google Scholar

[13] Westwater J W,Drickamer H G. The Mathematics of Diffusion. [J]. Mathematical Gazette, 1956, 7(10):276.

Google Scholar

[14] Boyd G E,Schubert J,Adamson A W. The exchange adsorption of ions from aqueous solutions by organic zeolites; ion-exchange equilibria. [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1947, 69(11): 2818.

DOI: 10.1021/ja01203a064

Google Scholar

[15] Gemeay A H. Adsorption characteristics and the kinetics of the cation exchange of rhodamine-6G with Na+-montmorillonite [J]. Journal of Colloid & Interface Science, 2002, 251(2):235-241.

DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2002.8410

Google Scholar