Evaluating Post Machining Process of 3D Printing Topology Optimization

Article Preview

Abstract:

There is significant interest today in additive manufacturing which is automatically producing 3D objects by adding layer-upon-layer of material. Additive manufacturing offers a revolutionary way of creating parts despite their geometric complexity compared to conventional manufacturing methods. Today, both the number of additive manufacturing processes and the materials available has developed rapidly which leads to the easy integration of topology optimization with it to improve structural performance in engineering fields such as in an automobile, aerospace, medical and biomechanical industries. The principal aim of this paper is to study the post-machining process of topology optimized parts. Topology optimization is an intelligent approach to get the best reduce weight design and achieve optimal performance at the same time in many fields. Yet unfortunately, it still faces some post-machining issues.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

113-118

Citation:

Online since:

March 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Zhou Y., Nomura T. & Saitou K. (2019). Multicomponent topology optimization for additive manufacturing with build volume and cavity free constraints. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng, 19(2).

DOI: 10.1115/1.4042640

Google Scholar

[2] Xiong, Y., Yao, S., Zhao, Z.-L., & Xie, Y. M. (2020). A new approach to eliminating enclosed voids in topology optimization for additive manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing, 32.

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.101006

Google Scholar

[3] Mhapsekar K., McConaha M. & Anand S. (2018). Additive manufacturing constraints in topology optimization for improved manufacturability. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng, 140(5).

DOI: 10.1115/1.4039198

Google Scholar

[4] Wang W., Munro D., Wang C.C.L., van Keulen F. & Wu J. (2019). Space-time topology optimization for additive manufacturing: concurrent optimization of structural layout and fabrication sequence. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 61(1), 1–18.

DOI: 10.1007/s00158-019-02420-6

Google Scholar

[5] Clausen A., Aage N. & Sigmund O. (2016). Exploiting additive manufacturing infill in topology optimization for improved buckling load. Engineering, 2(2), 250–257.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2016.02.006

Google Scholar

[6] Information on https://www.beamler.com/post-processing-3d-printing/.

Google Scholar

[7] https://www.3dhubs.com/knowledge-base/supports-3d-printing-technology-overview/.

Google Scholar

[8] https://www.protolabs.com/resources/design-tips/post-processing-for-metal-3d-printing/.

Google Scholar

[9] Information on https://grabcad.com/challenges/ge-jet-engine-bracket-challenge.

Google Scholar

[10] Ahmed W., Alabdouli H., Alqaydi H., Mansour A., Al K.H., Al J.H., & 10th Annual International IEOM Conference, (2020). Open source 3d printer: a case study. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, March, 2995–3004.

Google Scholar

[11] Mansour A., Alabdouli H., Alqaydi H., Al K.H., Ahmed W., Al J.H. & 10th Annual International IEOM Conference, (2020). Evaluating the 3d printing capabilities. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, March, 2618–2629.

Google Scholar

[12] Al Darmaki A., Al Shamsi A., Ahmed W.K., Al Jassmi H. & 2019 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET) Dubai, United Arab Emirates, March (2019). In Designing and developing innovative structural engineering failure experiment using additive manufacturing technology (p.1–6).

DOI: 10.1109/icaset.2019.8714208

Google Scholar