Effect of Using Flue-Gas Desulfurization Gypsum and Water Treatment Sludge on Compressive Strength of Cement Mortar

Article Preview

Abstract:

Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is a material that is widely used in construction. The production of OPC creates large amounts of carbon dioxide. Mortar is one of the building materials that uses cement as the main ingredient, including the use of natural sand as a fine aggregate. Therefore, to reduce the use of cement and natural materials, flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) gypsum was used instead of OPC, and water treatment sludge (WTS) was used instead of fine sand to create cement mortar. This research used both materials as ingredients in the production of cement mortar and helped to reduce waste in the environment. The objective is to study the suitable ratios of FGD gypsum and WTS in the production of cement mortar. As for the binder, FGD gypsum was used instead of OPC at 0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%. Instead of fine sand, WTS was used at 0%, 5%, 10%, and 15%. The cement mortar was tested after 7 days for compressive strength. It was found that the cement mortar made with increased ratios of FGD gypsum and WTS decreased in compressive strength.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

143-149

Citation:

Online since:

August 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L. Jiang, C. Li, C. Zhu, Z. Song and H. Chu: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol. 151 (2017), pp.119-126.

Google Scholar

[2] E. Gartner: Cem. Concr. Res. Vol. 34 (2004), pp.1489-1498.

Google Scholar

[3] Q. Zhang, G. Ye and E. Koenders: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol. 38 (2013), pp.1040-1050.

Google Scholar

[4] D.V.P. Heede and D.N. Belie: Cement. Concrete. Comp. Vol. 34 (2012), pp.431-442.

Google Scholar

[5] Information on https://www.xn--22cd2c1arkbdmea1adsd9bk3c7crjcdn1mxj.com.

Google Scholar

[6] H.N. Koralegedara, X.P. Pinto, D.D. Dionysiou and R.S. Al-Abed: J. Environ. Manage. Vol. 251 (2019), 109572.

Google Scholar

[7] L.X. Guo and S.H. Shi: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol. 22 (2008), pp.1471-1476.

Google Scholar

[8] S. Zhong, K. Ni and J. Li: J. Waste. Manag. Vol. 32 (2012), pp.1468-1472.

Google Scholar

[9] S. Kongsomsaksiri and N. Yammoth: J. of Indust. Tech. Vol. 2 (2006).

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Zhang, F. Pan and R. Wu: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol. 128 (2016), pp.1-11.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Wansom, P. Chintasongkro and W. Srijampam: Cement. Concrete. Comp. Vol.103 (2019), pp.134-148.

Google Scholar

[12] Information on http://www.thaitca.or.th/images/journal/journal28/journal%2028-1.pdf.

Google Scholar

[13] Information on http://sutir.sut.ac.th:8080/sutir/handle/123456789/5027.

Google Scholar

[14] M.G. Rabie, A.H. El-Halim and H.E. Rozaik: Aim. Shams. Eng. J. Vol.10 (2019), pp.705-712.

Google Scholar

[15] A. Sales and D.R.F Soiza: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol. 23 (2009), pp.2362-2370.

Google Scholar

[16] ASTM C109/C109M: Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens), ASTM International (2016).

DOI: 10.1520/c0109_c0109m-20

Google Scholar

[17] L. Phutthimethakul, P. Kumpueng and N. Supakata: Crystals Vol. 10 (2020).

Google Scholar

[18] Z. Owsiak: Ceramics—Silikáty Vol. 54 (2010), pp.277-283.

Google Scholar

[19] L. Jiang, C. Li, C. Wang, N. Xu and H. Chu: J. Clean. Prod. Vol. 20 (2018), pp.589-598.

Google Scholar

[20] Information on https://kb.psu.ac.th/psukb/handle/2010/7064.

Google Scholar

[21] N. Inthabut: J. of TCA Vol. 6 (2018), pp.10-19.

Google Scholar

[22] L. Liu, Y. Zhuge, K.W.C. Chow, A. Keegan, D. Li, N.P. Pham, J. Huang and R. Siddique: J. Clean. Prod. Vol. 261 (2020), 121257.

Google Scholar