The Potential Use of Brick Wastes in the Generation of New Materials for Construction through Geopolymerization Processes

Article Preview

Abstract:

The calcined clay bricks are the second most used materials in construction that, after the demolition processes, tends to become rubble, generating a negative visual and environmental impact, in addition to the fact that the brick-making process has not been industrialized in Ecuador, for that, its properties are deficient; in this way, the present research aims to study the physical, chemical and mineralogical characteristics of brick waste from the Southern part of ​​this country, for the elaboration of ecological bricks through geopolymerization processes, using as alkaline activator Sodium Hydroxide at temperature ranged between 90 °C and 200 °C, obtaining an optimal mixture at the combination 12.5 M, 26 wt% Cs, 150 °C. The mechanical properties of bricks as simple compression and flexural strength, respectively, applying the experimental Griffith criterion method by finite element simulation method. These ecological bricks obtained are suitable for use in construction.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

387-391

Citation:

Online since:

November 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H. Li, L. Dong, Z. Jiang, X. Yang, and Z. Yang, Study on utilization of red brick waste powder in the production of cement-based red decorative plaster for walls,, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 133, p.1017–1026, 2016,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.149

Google Scholar

[2] U.S. Enviromental Protection Agency Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, Construction and Demolition Debris Management in the United States , 2015,, no. March, p.1–24, (2020).

Google Scholar

[3] C. L. Wong, K. H. Mo, S. P. Yap, U. J. Alengaram, and T. C. Ling, Potential use of brick waste as alternate concrete-making materials: A review,, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 195, p.226–239, 2018,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.193

Google Scholar

[4] A. Zúñiga, Ciencia e ingeniería de nuevos materiales en la fabricación mejorados tecnologicamente,, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, (2018).

DOI: 10.20868/upm.thesis.52643

Google Scholar

[5] J. Davidovits, Geopolymer and Applications. France: Institut Geopolymere, (2015).

Google Scholar

[6] ASTM D422, Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils,, Annu. B. ASTM Stand., vol. D422-63, p.1–8, 2007, doi: West Conshohocken, PA.

Google Scholar

[7] ASTM D4318, Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils,, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 2017. https://www.astm.org/Standards/D4318.

Google Scholar

[8] ASTM C373, Standard Test Method for Water Absorption, Bulk Density, Apparent Porosity, and Apparent Specific Gravity of Fired Whiteware Products,, Annu. B. ASTM Stand., vol. 88, no. Reapproved, p.1–2, 1999,.

DOI: 10.1520/c0373-14

Google Scholar

[9] A. H. Munsell, Munsell soil color charts. Baltimore, (1990).

Google Scholar

[10] B. Lesikar, C. Hallmark, R. Melton, and B. Harris, On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems: Soil Particle Analysis Procedure,, Texas A&M Univ. Syst., p.18, 2005, [Online]. Available: http://nctx-water.tamu.edu/media/1602/b-6175.pdf.

Google Scholar

[11] NRCS Soils Staff, Soil Survey Manual. Washington, (1951).

Google Scholar

[12] V. J. García, C. O. Márquez, A. R. Zúñiga-Suárez, B. C. Zuñiga-Torres, and L. J. Villalta-Granda, Brazilian Test of Concrete Specimens Subjected to Different Loading Geometries: Review and New Insights,, Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater., vol. 11, no. 2, p.343–363, 2017,.

DOI: 10.1007/s40069-017-0194-7

Google Scholar

[13] A. A. Griffits, The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids,, Philos. Trans. R. Soc., vol. A221, p.163–198, 1921,.

Google Scholar

[14] N. INEN 297, Ladrillos cerámicos. Requisitos,, Inst. Ecuatoriano Norm., vol. 297, p.7, (1978).

Google Scholar

[15] X. Hao, B. C. Ball, J. L. B. Culley, M. R. Carter, and G. W. Parkin, Chapter 57: Soil density and porosity,, Soil Sampl. methods Anal., no. June, p.743–760, (2006).

Google Scholar

[16] B. Zúñiga-Torres et al., Innovative materials for sustainable construction,, Mater. Sci. Forum, vol. 1023 MSF, p.155–162, 2021,.

Google Scholar

[17] O. S. Sore, A. Messan, E. Prud, G. Escadeillas, and F. Tsobnang, Synthesis and characterization of geopolymer binders based on local materials from Burkina Faso – Metakaolin and rice husk ash,, Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 124, p.301–311, 2016,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.102

Google Scholar

[18] R. Gutiérrez-Moizant, M. Ramírez-Berasategui, S. Santos-Cuadros, and C. C. García-Fernández, A Novel Analytical Solution for the Brazilian Test with Loading Arcs,, Math. Probl. Eng., vol. 2020, no. c, 2020,.

DOI: 10.1155/2020/2935812

Google Scholar