Development and Characterisation of Triaxial Electrical Porcelains from Malaysian Ceramic Minerals

Article Preview

Abstract:

Four formulations of triaxial porcelain composed from 34 – 49% clay, 13 – 22% potash feldspar, 10 – 30% Soda feldspar and 14 – 28% silica sand, were prepared from raw materials sourced from Malaysian deposits. Specimens were made using the dry pressing method and characterized in terms of constituent oxide composition, compressive strength and powder-XRD analyses, respectively. XRD studies revealed that the crystalline phases are mullite and quartz and their intensity is almost identical for all samples fired at 1250°C but there is a decrease in quartz content as temperature is increased. Samples with 28% sand content resulted in higher compressive strength compared to those containing 14% and 25% sand. The major factor influencing compressive strength was found to be porosity in samples as opposed to crystallinity. A body EP3 with 64.9% SiO2, 25.4% Al2O3, 3.6% K2O, 1.5% Na2O and 1.09% others exhibited best mechanical properties due to greater density and lower porosity formation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

240-244

Citation:

Online since:

January 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P. W. Olupot, S. Jonsson, and J. K. Byaruhanga, Development and characterisation of triaxial electrical porcelains from Ugandan ceramic minerals,, Ceram. Int., vol. 36, no. 4, p.1455–1461, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2010.02.006

Google Scholar

[2] D. A. A. Garza, A. Rodríguez, E. Contreras, J. F. L, A. Alvarez-m, and F. J. V, Effect of nano-TiO 2 content on the mechano-physical properties of electro-technical porcelain,, vol. 254, no. April, (2020).

Google Scholar

[3] W. Ryan and C. Radford, Whitewares: Production, Testing and Quality Control: Including Materials, Body Formulations and Manufacturing Processes. Oxford: Pergamon Press, (1987).

Google Scholar

[4] J. Zamek, Commercial clay body formulation,, Ceram. Tech., no. 36, p.36–41, (2013).

Google Scholar

[5] E. Rau, Feldspar. In N. L. Weiss (Ed.). SME mineral processing handbook. New York: Society of Mining Engineers of the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers., (1985).

Google Scholar

[6] S. Ke, X. Cheng, Y. Wang, Q. Wang, and H. Wang, Dolomite , wollastonite and calcite as different CaO sources in anorthite-based porcelain,, Ceram. Int., vol. 39, no. 5, p.4953–4960, (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.11.091

Google Scholar