Numerical Analysis of Masonry Structures through a Modified Composite Interface (MCI) Model

Abstract:

This paper presents an innovative modelling approach for evaluating the structural response of new and existing masonry buildings characterized by a periodic arrangement of units and mortar joints. The aim is to provide a calculation tool that allows to model the non-linear behaviour of masonry structures under lateral and vertical loads with a reduced numerical effort, without compromising the accuracy of the results. The proposed model is a typical D-FEM (Discontinuum - Finite Element Model) consisting of deformable blocks, which incorporates several masonry units. The blocks are separated by interface elements placed along predetermined surfaces on which cracks, sliding or crushing planes can develop. The surface layout is conceived to replicate all the fundamental failure mechanisms that can occur in real masonry structures. To adequately describe the non-linear behaviour of the interface elements, a Modified Composite Interface (MCI) model is formulated by modifying the "Combined Cracking-Shearing-Crushing" model originally proposed by Lourenço to simulate the cracking mechanisms along the interface elements of simplified micro-models in FEM analysis. The proposed D-FE model has been already calibrated and validated by the Authors on different masonry panels and, through an Evolutionary Polynomial Regression (EPR), expressions in closed form have been defined to calculate the mechanical parameters of the new MCI model starting from the original CI. Particularly, for each mechanical parameter, six formulas of increasing complexity have been identified through non-linear regression, progressively including a greater number of input variables to increase the precision of results. The aim of this study is to determine the accuracy of these formulas. Numerical analyses are carried out on a population of sixty-four masonry walls already used in the previous calibration phase, modeling each panel with all available equations. This allows to evaluate the average accuracy of each formula and to understand their efficiency in terms of calculation effort and correctness of the results.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 916)
• Pages: 256-264
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-to1l34
• Online since: April 2022
• Authors: Ylenia Di Lallo, Davide Rapone, Maria Giovanna Masciotta*, Giuseppe Brando
• Keywords: Composite Interface Model, Discontinuum Finite Element Model, Masonry Structures, MCI, Seismic Vulnerability

References

[1] P. B. Lourenço, Computations on historic masonry structures, Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater., vol. 4, no. 3, p.301–319, 2002,.

DOI: 10.1002/pse.120

[2] P. B. Lourenço, D. V. Oliveira, and G. Milani, Computational Advances in Masonry Structures: From Mesoscale Modelling to Engineering Application, p.1–23, 2010,.

DOI: 10.4203/csets.25.1

[3] P. Roca, M. Cervera, G. Gariup, and L. Pela', Structural analysis of masonry historical constructions. Classical and advanced approaches, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., vol. 17, no. 3, p.299–325, 2010,.

DOI: 10.1007/s11831-010-9046-1

[4] M. Petracca, L. Pelà, R. Rossi, S. Zaghi, G. Camata, and E. Spacone, Micro-scale continuous and discrete numerical models for nonlinear analysis of masonry shear walls, Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 149, p.296–314, 2017,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.130

[5] L. Pelà, M. Cervera, and P. Roca, Continuum damage model for orthotropic materials: Application to masonry, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 200, no. 9–12, p.917–930, 2011,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2010.11.010

[6] L. Pelà, M. Cervera, and P. Roca, An orthotropic damage model for the analysis of masonry structures, Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 41, p.957–967, 2013,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.014

[7] G. Brando, E. Criber, and G. De Matteis, The effects of L'aquila earthquake on the St. Gemma church in Goriano Sicoli: part II—fem analysis, Bull. Earthq. Eng., vol. 13, no. 12, p.3733–3748, 2015,.

DOI: 10.1007/s10518-015-9793-3

[8] P. Lourenço, Computational Strategy for Masonry Structures- Ph.D dissertation, (1996).

[9] P. G. Asteris and a. D. Tzamtzis, On the Use of a Regular Yield Surface for the Analysis of Unreinforced Masonry Walls, Electron. J. Struct. Eng., vol. \textbf{3}, p.23–42, (2003).

DOI: 10.56748/ejse.329

[10] P. B. Lourenço and J. G. Rots, Multisurface interface model for analysis of masonry structures, J. Eng. Mech., vol. 123, no. 7, p.660–668, 1997,.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1997)123:7(660)

[11] P. G. Asteris and a. D. Tzamtzis, On the Use of a Regular Yield Surface for the Analysis of Unreinforced Masonry Walls, Electron. J. Struct. Eng., vol. \textbf{3}, p.23–42, (2003).

DOI: 10.56748/ejse.329

[12] D. Rapone, G. Brando, E. Spacone. A discontinuum finite element modelling approach for reproducing the structural behaviour of masonry walls. In: Proceedings of the 14th World Congress in Computational Mechanics (WCCM) ECCOMAS Congress, Paris, France; (2020).

DOI: 10.23967/wccm-eccomas.2020.015

[13] Evolutionary Polynomial Regression EPR MOGA-XL-Office Excel Add-in (1.0).

[14] O. Giustolisi and D. A. Savic, Advances in data-driven analyses and modelling using EPR-MOGA, J. Hydroinformatics, vol. 11, no. 3–4, p.225–236, 2009,.

DOI: 10.2166/hydro.2009.017

[15] M.F. CSPFEA, Nonlinear & detail finite element analysis system for civil structures. User Manual, FEA 2016 v1.1.

[16] T.M.J. Raijmakers and A.T. Vermeltfoort, Deformation controlled tests in masonry shear walls (in Dutch). Report B-92-1156, Delft, The Netherlands, (1992).

[17] G. Magenes and G.M. Calvi, In-plane seismic response of brick masonry walls, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., vol. 26, no. 11, p.1091–1112, 1997,.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(199711)26:11<1091::aid-eqe693>3.0.co;2-6

[18] G. Magenes, G. R Kingsley, G. M. Calvi. Seismic testing of a full-scale, two-story masonry building: test procedure and measured experimental response,. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) - Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dai Terremoti - Technical Report 3.0. Pavia, Italy. [in Italian]; (1995).

DOI: 10.20333/25000136-2021-2-104