Experimental Investigation on Flexural Performance of Masonry Wallettes Strengthened with Cementitious Matrix Grid

Article Preview

Abstract:

A large experimental study was conducted at IIT Patna, India to evaluate the effectiveness of different types of cementitious matrix grids (CMGs) in improving the flexural performance of unreinforced masonry specimens. Four types of masonry wallettes: brick-lime mortar, brick-cement mortar, brick-mud mortar and autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) block masonry were prepared in the laboratory. In this study, eleven different CMG comprising of glass fabric and steel wire meshes embedded in the five different grades of cementitious matrix were used to strengthen the masonry assemblages. The aim of this study is to understand the role of various parameters such as tensile strength of CMG, compressive strength of masonry and cementitious matrix in influencing the efficiency of the strengthening scheme. In total 130 specimens with failure plane-parallel and perpendicular to the bed joint were prepared and tested under quasi-static displacement control loading. Considering the ease of installation, the fabric was directly placed on the masonry wallette using mechanical anchors and then covered with a thick layer of cementitious matrix.Test results highlights that all strengthening schemes are effective and can significantly enhance the flexural moment capacity in the range of 2.5 - 63.0 times the flexural moment of the respective control specimens. These strengthening schemes effectively mitigate the brittle behaviour of masonry wallettes and improved the deformation capacity by 1.2 - 18.1 times when compared to the respective control specimens. The study also illustrated that the strength of cementitious matrix can play an important role in contributing to the strength and deformability of the masonry specimens strengthened with CMG. For low strength cementitious matrix, debonding failure was commonly observed, whereas, for high strength cementitious matrix, the failure/rupture of reinforcement was noticed. In addition, the shear failure of masonry or debonding failure of reinforcing mesh was observed for specimens in which CMG had higher percentage of reinforcement.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

275-282

Citation:

Online since:

April 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D. C. Rai, V. Singhal, S. B. Raj, S. L. Sagar, Performance of residential buildings during the M 7.8 Gorkha (Nepal) earthquake of 25 April 2015, Curr. Sci. (2015) 2126-2135.

DOI: 10.18520/cs/v109/i11/2126-2136

Google Scholar

[2] D. C. Rai, V. Singhal, T. Pradhan, A. Tripathi, Seismic vulnerability of monastery temples of stone masonry in Sikkim Himalaya, Curr. Sci. 110(10) (2016) 1947-1957.

DOI: 10.18520/cs/v110/i10/1947-1957

Google Scholar

[3] N. Galati, G. Tumialan, A. Nanni, Strengthening with FRP bars of URM walls subject to out-of-plane loads, Constr. Build. Mater. 20(1-2) (2006) 101-110.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.047

Google Scholar

[4] S.L. Sagar, V. Singhal, D.C. Rai, P. Gudur, Diagonal shear and out-of-plane flexural strength of fabric reinforced cementitious matrix–strengthened masonry walletes, J. Compos. Constr. 21(4) (2017) 04017016.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000796

Google Scholar

[5] D. Tripathy, P. Meghwal, V. Singhal, Strengthening of Lime Mortar Masonry Wallettes Using Fiber-Reinforced Cementitious Matrix, J. Compos. Constr. 24(6) (2020) 04020075.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0001086

Google Scholar

[6] D. Tripathy, V. Singhal, Strengthening of weak masonry assemblages using wire reinforced cementitious matrix (WRCM) for shear and flexure loads, Constr. Build. Mater. 277 (2021) 122223.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.122223

Google Scholar

[7] BS EN 1052-2, Methods of test for masonry, Part 2: Determination of flexural strength, British Standard Institution, London, (1999).

Google Scholar

[8] IS 13935, Indian standard seismic evaluation, repair and strengthening of masonry building-guidelines, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, (2009).

Google Scholar

[9] IS 3495, Indian standard methods of test of burnt clay building bricks, Part 2: Determination of water absorption. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, (1992).

Google Scholar

[10] IS 3495, Indian standard methods of test of burnt clay building bricks, Part 1: Determination of compressive strength, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, (1992).

Google Scholar

[11] IS 1905, Indian standard code of practice for structural use of unreinforced masonry, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, (1987).

Google Scholar

[12] IS 1608, Indian standard metallic materials-tensile testing at ambient temperature, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, (2005).

Google Scholar

[13] IS 650, Standard sand for testing of cement- specification, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, (1991).

Google Scholar

[14] AC434, Acceptance criteria for masonry and concrete strengthening using fiber- reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) composite systems, ICC Evaluation Service, Whittier, CA, (2013).

DOI: 10.14359/51702356

Google Scholar

[15] S. De Santis, F. Ceroni, G. de Felice, M. Fagone, B. Ghiassi, A. Kwiecien´, G.P. Lignola, M. Morganti, M. Santandrea, M.R. Valluzzi, A. Viskovic, Round robin test on tensile and bond behavior of steel reinforced grout systems, Composites, Part B. 127 (2017) 100-120.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.052

Google Scholar

[16] K. Galal, N. Sasanian, Out-of-plane flexural performance of GFRP-reinforced masonry walls, J. Compos. Constr. 14(2) (2010) 162-74.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000061

Google Scholar