Optical Processing Damage Reduced by Polishing Technology with Material Removal in Elastic Mode

Article Preview

Abstract:

Surface/subsurface processing damage on optical component can severely affect its surface mechanical properties and cause its resistance to external deformation to deteriorate. At the same time, the processing damage will also affect the surface quality. The surface processing defects are the main reasons leading to the decrease in the laser induced damage threshold in high-density laser system. In this paper, the damage formation mode and morphology of the traditional optical processing methods based on the mechanical removal in brittle and plastic modes are evaluated, then the traditional processing damage model is established accordingly. The polishing technology with material removal in elastic mode is proposed based on the damage generation mechanism. In the elastic mode, it is impossible to form the material removal by mechanical action due to the inability to overcome the yield limit of the material, thus it is necessary to introduce a weakening of the chemical reaction to reduce the bonding force of the surface layer of the optical element, using less force to form the material removal to ensure the disturbance of the basic material is controlled. The mechanism of material removal in elastic mode was analyzed. The polishing process was realized by elastic hydrodynamic ultra-smooth polishing and nano-particle jet polishing. The performance of the elastic polishing process was analyzed. The experimental results show that the elastic polishing processing method can effectively remove surface damage and achieve effective control of processing damage.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

203-210

Citation:

Online since:

May 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Ando, M. Negishi, M. Takimoto, A. Deguchi, et al. Super-smooth polishing on aspherical surfaces, Nanotechnol. 6(1995) 111-120.

DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/6/4/002

Google Scholar

[2] T. I. Suratwala, P. E. Miller, J. D. Bude, et al., HF-based etching processes for improving laser damage resistance of fused silica optical surfaces, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 94(2011) 416–428.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04112.x

Google Scholar

[3] N. Bloembergen. Role of cracks, pores and absorbing inclusions on laser induced damage threshold at surfaces of transparent dielectrics, Appl. Opt. 12(1973) 661–664.

DOI: 10.1364/ao.12.000661

Google Scholar

[4] F. Y. Génin, A. Salleo, T. V. Pistor, et al., Role of light intensification by cracks in optical, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 18(2001) 2607–2616.

DOI: 10.1364/josaa.18.002607

Google Scholar

[5] P. P. Hed, D. F. Edwards, J. B. Davis, Subsurface damage in optical materials: origin, measurement and removal[R]. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Report, 1989:1-17.

Google Scholar

[6] T. G. Bifano, T. A. Dow, R. O. Scattergood, Ductile-regime grinding: a new technology for machining brittle materials, J. Eng. Ind. 113(1991) 184-189.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2899676

Google Scholar

[7] M. Buijs, K. K. Houten, Three-body abrasion of brittle materials as studied by lapping, Wear, 166(1993) 237-245.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(93)90267-p

Google Scholar

[8] F. W. Preston, The structure of abraded glass surfaces, Trans. Opt. Soc. 23(1922) 141-164.

DOI: 10.1088/1475-4878/23/3/301

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Xie, B. Bhushan, Effects of particle size, polishing pad and contact pressure in free abrasive polishing, Wear, 200(1996) 281-295.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(96)07275-4

Google Scholar

[10] D. W. Camp, M. R. Kozlowski, L. M. Sheehan, et al. Subsurface damage and polishing compound affect the 355-nm laser damage threshold of fused silica surfaces, Proc. of SPIE 3244(1998) 356-364.

DOI: 10.1117/12.307044

Google Scholar

[11] G. Hu, Y. Zhao, D. Li, Q. Xiao, et al., Studies of laser damage morphology reveal subsurface feature in fused silica, Surf. Interface Anal. 42(2010) 1465–1468.

DOI: 10.1002/sia.3267

Google Scholar

[12] J. W. Carr, E. Fearon, L. J. Summers, I. D. Hutcheon, Subsurface damage assessment with atomic force microscopy, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report, (1999)1-4.

Google Scholar

[13] Y. Zhao, D. M. Maietta, L. Chang, An Asperity Microcontact Model Incorporating the Transition from Elastic Deformation to Fully Plastic Flow, Journal of Tribology, 122(2000) 86–93.

DOI: 10.1115/1.555332

Google Scholar

[14] Z. Song, Y. Zhang, F. H. Zhang, Study on removal mechanism of nanoparticle colloid jet machining, Advanced Materials Research, 53-54(2008) 363-368.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.53-54.363

Google Scholar

[15] W Q Peng, C L Guan, S Y Li, Ultrasmooth surface polishing based on the hydrodynamic effect, Applied Optics, 52(2013) 6411-6416.

DOI: 10.1364/ao.52.006411

Google Scholar