Mechanical Behaviour of Magnesium Alloy Based - Fiber Metal Laminates after Fabrication Using Different Metal Surface Treatments

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents an experimental investigation of the mechanical response and failure mode of magnesium alloy-based Fibre Metal Laminates (FMLs) having different surface pretreatments under axial compression loading conditions. To improve the interfacial bonding strength between the metal and composite layers, three categories of samples were fabricated by hot pressing using sandblasted, annealed and both sandblasted and annealed AZ31B magnesium alloy sheets. To evaluate the bonding strength along the shear and normal directions, single lap shear tests and T-peel tests were conducted. It was found that the combination of sandblasting and annealing can greatly enhance the shear and normal interfacial bonding strength compared with only sandblasting and annealing, separately. To assess the effect of the interfacial bonding strength on the FML compressive performance, quasi-static buckling tests were performed at varying surface treatments of the magnesium alloy sheets. The analysis of the load-stroke curves and failure modes indicates that delamination can significantly reduce the buckling capability and structural stability, and that the improvement of interfacial bonding strength can dramatically strengthen the FML compressive capability.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] K. Majerski, B. Surowska, J. Bienias, The comparison of effects of hygrothermal conditioning on mechanical properties of fibre metal laminates and fibre reinforced polymers, Compos. Part B Eng.142 (2018) 108-116.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.002

Google Scholar

[2] G.B. Chai, P. Manikandan, Low velocity impact response of fibre-metal laminates-a review, Compos. Struct. 107 (2014) 363-381.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.08.003

Google Scholar

[3] Z. Asaee, S. Shadlou, F. Taheri, Low-velocity impact response of fiberglass/magnesium FMLs with a new 3D fiberglass fabric, Compos. Struct. 122 (2015) 155-165.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.038

Google Scholar

[4] W.T. He, L.F. Wang, H.C. Liu, et al. On impact behavior of fiber metal laminate (FML) structures: A state-of-the-art review, Thin-Walled Struct. 167 (2021) 108026.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.108026

Google Scholar

[5] T. Fischer, M. Grubenmann, M. Harhash, et al. Experimental and numerical investigations on the quasi-static structural properties of fibre metal laminates processed by thermoforming, Compos. Struct. 177 (2021) 108026.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113418

Google Scholar

[6] M. Kamocka, R.J. Mania, Post-buckling response of FML column with delamination, 2019 Compos. Struct.230 (2019) 111511.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111511

Google Scholar

[7] D. De Cicco, F. Taheri, Performances of magnesium-and steel-based 3D fiber-metal laminates under various loading conditions, Compos. Struct. 229 (2019) 111390.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111390

Google Scholar

[8] F. Mottaghian, H Yaghoobi, F. Taheri, Numerical and experimental investigations into post-buckling responses of stainless steel- and magnesium-based 3D-fiber metal laminates reinforced by basalt and glass fabrics, Compos. Part B Eng. 200 (2020) 108300.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108300

Google Scholar

[9] D. Banat, R.J. Mania, Failure assessment of thin-walled FML profiles during buckling and postbuckling response, Compos. Part B Eng. 112 (2017) 278-289.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.001

Google Scholar

[10] Y.B. Hu, H.G. Li, L. Cai, J.P. Zhu, L. Pan, J. Xu, et al. Preparation and properties of Fibre-Metal Laminates based on carbon fibre reinforced PMR polyimide. Compos. Part B Eng. 69 (2015) 587–591.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.011

Google Scholar

[11] ASTM Standard D1002-10 (2019), Standard test method for apparent shear strength of single-lap-joint adhesively bonded metal specimens by tension loading (Metal– to-Metal). ASTM Int. (2019).

DOI: 10.1520/d1002-99

Google Scholar

[12] ASTM Standard D1876-08 (2015), Standard test method for peel resistance of adhesives (T-Peel test). ASTM Int. (2015).

Google Scholar