Minimizing Adsorption of Anionic Surfactant in Alkaline-Surfactant-Polymer System: Effects of pH and Surfactant Concentration

Article Preview

Abstract:

Alkaline-surfactant-polymer (ASP) flooding has been identified as the most effective enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technique to boost up the production of crude oil and improve the recoverable reserves. However, surfactant loss into the formation due to adsorption has been one of the issues, which could degrade the efficiency of the process. This study highlights the static adsorption of anionic sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) surfactant on the quartz sand with presences of alkaline and polymer at different pH and surfactant concentration. The critical micellar concentration (CMC) of SDS was determined using surface tension method and found at 0.22wt%. Three different systems were formulated namely A, B and C referring to the Surfactant formulation, Alkaline-Surfactant (AS) formulation and Alkaline-Surfactant-Polymer (ASP) formulation, respectively. For static adsorption tests, ASP system was formulated by adding 10,000 ppm sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) and 500 ppm of anionic Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide (HPAM) polymer into the surfactant solution. The formulation was then mixed with the quartz sand at a fixed mass to volume ratio of 1:5. The adsorption tests involved shaking the mixtures, centrifuging, and analysing the supernatant solutions using UV-Visible spectrophotometer for adsorption measurement. The adsorption tests resulted in low adsorption at higher pH and low surfactant concentration. It was discovered that the lowest surfactant adsorption exhibited by ASP system with approximate reductions of 65% and 63% as compared to surfactant formulation at ~pH 12 and 2000 ppm surfactant concentration, respectively. Thus, anionic surfactant has a great performance in ASP system compared to its individual formulation, resulting in lower surfactant adsorption.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

75-82

Citation:

Online since:

January 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A.A. Olajire, Review of ASP EOR (alkaline surfactant polymer enhanced oil recovery) technology in the petroleum industry: Prospects and challenges, Energy. 77 (2014) 963–982.

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.005

Google Scholar

[2] T.A.T. Mohd, M.Z. Jaafar, A.A.A. Rasol, M.F. Hamid, Measurement of streaming potential in downhole application: An insight for enhanced oil recovery monitoring, MATEC Web Conf. 87 (2017) 03002.

DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20178703002

Google Scholar

[3] T.A.T. Mohd, M.Z. Jaafar, A.A.A. Rasol, J. Ali, A new prospect of streaming potential measurement in alkaline-surfactant polymer flooding, Chem. Eng. Trans. 56 (2017) 1183–1188.

Google Scholar

[4] P.A. Owusu, S. Asumadu-sarkodie, A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation, Civil & Environmental Engineering Review Article (2016) 1–14.

DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2016.1167990

Google Scholar

[5] G.J. Hirasaki, C.A. Miller, M. Puerto, Recent advances in surfactant EOR, SPE Journal. (2011) 889-907.

DOI: 10.2118/115386-pa

Google Scholar

[6] H. ShamsiJazeyi, R. Verduzco, G.J. Hirasaki, Reducing adsorption of anionic surfactant for enhanced oil recovery: Part II. Applied aspects, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 453 (2014) 168–175.

DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.02.021

Google Scholar

[7] A.F. Belhaj, K.A. Elraies, S.M. Mahmood, N.N. Zulkifli, S. Akbari, O.S.E. Hussien, The effect of surfactant concentration, salinity, temperature, and pH on surfactant adsorption for chemical enhanced oil recovery: a review, J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 10 (2020) 125–137.

DOI: 10.1007/s13202-019-0685-y

Google Scholar

[8] K. Ma, L. Cui, Y. Dong, T. Wang, C. Da, G.J. Hirasaki, S.L. Biswal, Adsorption of cationic and anionic surfactants on natural and synthetic, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 408 (2013) 164–172.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.07.006

Google Scholar

[9] M.R. Azam, I.M. Tan, L. Ismail, M. Mushtaq, M. Nadeem, M. Sagir, Kinetics and Equilibria of Synthesized Anionic Surfactant onto Berea Sandstone, J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 35 (2014) 223–230.

DOI: 10.1080/01932691.2013.783491

Google Scholar

[10] M.R. Azam, I.M. Tan, L. Ismail, M. Mushtaq, M. Nadeem, M. Sagir, Static adsorption of anionic surfactant onto crushed Berea sandstone, J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 3 (2013) 195–201.

DOI: 10.1007/s13202-013-0057-y

Google Scholar

[11] J. Van Erum, D. Van Dam, P.P. De Deyn, Alzheimer's disease: Neurotransmitters of the sleep-wake cycle, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 105 (2019) 72–80.

DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.07.019

Google Scholar

[12] T.A.T. Mohd, M.Z. Jaafar, Adsorption of anionic sodium dodecyl sulfate surfactant on local sand and kaolinite surfaces: the prospect of alkaline and salinity, Recent Technol. Eng. 7 (2019) 2277-3878.

Google Scholar

[13] H. Zhang, M. Dong, S. Zhao, Experimental study of the interaction between NaOH, surfactant, and polymer in reducing court heavy oil/brine interfacial tension. Energy Fuels. 26 (2012) 3644–3650.

DOI: 10.1021/ef300498r

Google Scholar

[14] J.J. Sheng, Critical review of alkaline-polymer flooding, J. Petrol. Explor. Prod. Technol. 7 (2017) 147–153.

DOI: 10.1007/s13202-016-0239-5

Google Scholar

[15] A. Azdarpour, R. Junin, M. Manan, H. Hamidi, R. Rafati, The effects of controlling parameters on polymer enhanced foam (PEF) stability, J. Teknol. 73 (2015) 53–59.

DOI: 10.11113/jt.v73.1701

Google Scholar

[16] T.A.T. Mohd, N. Alias, N.A. Ghazali, E. Yahya, A. Sauki, A. Azizi, N.M. Yusof, Mobility investigation of nanoparticle-stabilized carbon dioxide foam for enhanced oil recovery (EOR), Adv. Mat. Res. 1119 (2015) 90–95.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1119.90

Google Scholar

[17] T.A.T. Mohd, N.F. Abu Bakar, N. Awang, A.A. Talib, Aqueous foams stabilized with silica nanoparticle and alpha olefin sulfonates surfactant, J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 12 (2018) 3759–3770.

Google Scholar

[18] A. Azizi, H. Husin, N.A. Ghazali, M.K. Khairudin, A. Sauki, N.H. Alias, T.A.T. Mohd, Nanoparticles stabilized carbon dioxide foams in sandstone and limestone reservoir, Adv. Mat. Res. 1119 (2015) 170–174.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1119.170

Google Scholar

[19] N.S.M. Azmi, N.F.A. Bakar, T.A.T. Mohd, A. Azizi, Molecular dynamics simulation on CO2 foam system with addition of SiO2 nanoparticles at various sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) concentrations and elevated temperatures for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) application, Comput. Mater. Sci. 184 (2020) 109937.

DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109937

Google Scholar

[20] B. Tanhaei, N. Saghatoleslami, M.P. Chenar, A. Ayati, M. Hesampour, M. Mänttäri, Experimental study of CMC evaluation in single and mixed surfactant systems, using the UV-Vis spectroscopic method, J. Surfactants Deterg. 16 (2013) 357–362.

DOI: 10.1007/s11743-012-1403-7

Google Scholar

[21] S. Najimi, I. Nowrouzi, A. Khaksar Manshad, A.H. Mohammadi, Experimental study of the performances of commercial surfactants in reducing interfacial tension and wettability alteration in the process of chemical water injection into carbonate reservoirs, J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 10 (2019) 1551–1563.

DOI: 10.1007/s13202-019-00789-0

Google Scholar

[22] N. Saxena, A. Kumar, A. Mandal, Adsorption analysis of natural anionic surfactant for enhanced oil recovery: The role of mineralogy, salinity, alkalinity and nanoparticles, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 173 (2019) 1264-1283.

DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.11.002

Google Scholar

[23] C.T.Q. Dang, Z. Chen, N.T.B. Nguyen, W. Bae, T.H. Phung, Development of isotherm polymer/surfactant adsorption models in chemical flooding, SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia, (2011).

DOI: 10.2118/147872-ms

Google Scholar

[24] L. Saunders, Surface and Colloid Chemistry, J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 3 (1951) 865–882.

Google Scholar

[25] W. Kwok, R.E. Hayes, H.A. Nasr-El-Din, Modelling dynamic adsorption of an anionic surfactant on Berea sandstone with radial flow, Chem. Eng. Sci. 50 (1995) 769–783.

DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(94)00450-6

Google Scholar

[26] A. Tabatabal, M.V. Gonzalez, J.H. Harwell, J.F. Scamehorn, Reducing surfactant adsorption in carbonate reservoirs, SPE Reserv. Eng. 8 (1993) 117–122.

DOI: 10.2118/24105-pa

Google Scholar

[27] E.J. Wanless, W.A. Ducker, Weak influence of divalent ions on anionic surfactant surface-aggregation, Langmuir. 13 (1997) 1463–1474.

DOI: 10.1021/la960861e

Google Scholar

[28] S. Elias, A. Rabiu, O. Oyekola, B. Seima, Adsorption characteristics of surfactants on different petroleum reservoir materials, The Online J. Sci. Technol. 6 (2016) 6–16.

Google Scholar

[29] J.J. Sheng, Surfactant Flooding, Modern Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery: Theory and Practice, (2011).

Google Scholar

[30] S. Thomas and S.M. Farouq Ali, Micellar flooding and ASP - chemical methods for enhanced oil recovery, J. Can. Pet. Technol. 40 (2001) 46–52.

DOI: 10.2118/01-02-04

Google Scholar