CT-Based Dimensional Metrology for Quality Assessment of the Internal Structure of Additive Manufactured Aluminum Parts

Article Preview

Abstract:

Two common types of internal defects of additively manufactured (AM) samples are lack-of-fusion and gas-entrapped porosities. These internal defects can have different physical origins and particular local characteristics (e.g., different shape, size). Thus, the use of reliable non-destructive inspection techniques is essential for the accurate assessment of integrity, allowing the applicable AM processing parameters correction. To overcome this challenge, this work aims to evaluate the accuracy of volumetric characteristics measured by computed tomography for porosity evaluations in AM samples, including assessment of measurement uncertainty. The effect of different cumulative thickness on the evaluated measurements accuracy is also assessed. The results show that deviations of defect size measurements can be below 2% if the proposed procedure is followed. In addition, the expanded uncertainty can be up to 10% of the measured magnitude when the cumulative thickness is increased to 70 mm. The physical relationships obtained between the cumulative thickness and the individual measurements are also presented.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

25-34

Citation:

Online since:

October 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Poudel, M.S. Yasin, J. Ye, J. Liu, A. Vinel, S. Shao, et al, Feature-based volumetric defect classification in metal additive manufacturing, Nat. Commun. 13 (2022) 6369.

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34122-x

Google Scholar

[2] R. Jiménez-Pacheco, S. Ontiveros, J.A. Yagüe-Fabra, F. Zanini F, S. Carmignato, J.A. Albajez, Assessment of Gradient-Based Algorithm for Surface Determination in Multi-Material Gap Measurements by X ray Computed Tomography, Materials 13 (2020) 5650.

DOI: 10.3390/ma13245650

Google Scholar

[3] H. Villarraga-Gómez, E.L. Herazo, S.T. Smith, X-ray computed tomography: from medical imaging to dimensional metrology, Precis. Eng. 60 (2019) 544-569.

DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.03.007

Google Scholar

[4] H. Villarraga-Gómez, J.D. Thousand, S.T. Smith, Empirical approaches to uncertainty analysis of x-ray computed tomography measurements: a review with examples, Precis. Eng. 60 (2020) 249-268.

DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2020.03.004

Google Scholar

[5] A. Thompson, I. Maskery, R.K. Leach, X-ray computed tomography for additive manufacturing: a review, Meas. Sci. Technol. 27 (2016) 072001.

DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/27/7/072001

Google Scholar

[6] B. Blakey-Milner, P. Gradl, G. Snedden, M. Brooks, J. Pitot, E. Lopez, et al, Metal additive manufacturing in aerospace: A review, Mater. Des. 209 (2021) 110008.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110008

Google Scholar

[7] F.H. Kim, A.L. Pintar, S.P. Moylan, E.J. Garboczi, The influence of X-Ray computed tomography acquisition parameters on image quality and probability of detection of additive manufacturing defects, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 141 (2019) 111002.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4044515

Google Scholar

[8] J. Lambert, A.R. Chambers, I. Sinclair, S.M. Spearing, 3D damage characterisation and the role of voids in the fatigue of wind turbine blade materials, Compos. Sci. Tech. 72 (2012) 337-343.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.11.023

Google Scholar

[9] I. Holgado, J. Iglesias, N. Ortega, S. Plaza, A. Pascual, CT image quality influence on different material Edge Response Functions for accurate metrological applications, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1193 (2021) 012064.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/1193/1/012064

Google Scholar

[10] P. Hermanek, S. Carmignato, Porosity measurements by X-ray computed tomography: Accuracy evaluation using a calibrated object, Precis. Eng. 49 (2017) 377-387.

DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.03.007

Google Scholar

[11] A.F. Obaton, C.G. Klingaa, C. Rivet, K. Mohaghegh, S. Baier, J.L. Andreasen, et al, Reference standards for XCT measurements of additively manufactured parts, 10th Conf. Ind. Comput. Tomogr. (2020) 1-10.

DOI: 10.58286/25111

Google Scholar

[12] J. Lesseur, B. Tranchand, T. Mancier, A. Montauzier, C. Larignon, S. Perusin, On the use of X-ray microtomography to control artificial defect geometries produced by metal additive manufacturing, Nondestruct. Test. Eval. 37 (2022) 611-630.

DOI: 10.1080/10589759.2022.2085701

Google Scholar

[13] A. Jansson, A.R. Zekavat, L. Pejryd, Measurement of internal features in additive manufactured components by the use of computed tomography, Dig. Ind. Rad. Com. Tomogr. (2015)

Google Scholar

[14] M. Kritikos, M. Kusá, M. Kusý, Evaluation of Aluminium Alloy (AlSi9Cu3 (Fe)) Porosity by Destructive and Non-destructive Method (Computed Tomography), Digit. Prod. Syst. Sel. Pap. ISPR2021 (2022) 181-191.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-90421-0_15

Google Scholar