Surface Characterisation and Comparison of Polymeric Additive Manufacturing Features for an XCT Test Object

Abstract:

Additive manufacturing (AM) has experimented a huge development in recent years, improving the physical properties of parts produced by these technologies to the level of being capable of fabricating end-use functional products. High performance metals are widely used and studied; however, the reduction in material costs of polymers and their acceptable properties makes them suitable for common AM purposes. The intrinsic surface roughness of AM, as a consequence of the layer-by-layer technology, remains a challenge and its characterisation is necessary for quality control. X-Ray computed tomography (XCT), as a newly adapted evaluation technology for industrial applications, sets an opportunity for the dimensional measurement of AM parts, due to its capability of characterising the complex geometries that is possible to create with this manufacturing technologies. In this paper, a first approach to a surface characterisation of polymeric AM parts is presented. Several individual objects have been designed and manufactured using various polymeric AM technologies with different manufacturing principles (FDM, Polyjet, SLS) to build ramps with a range of surface roughness created by two main parameters (angle of inclination and layer thickness). Measurements have been carried out by an optical device (focal variation microscope, FVM), and a comparison with theoretical roughness values calculated following predictive models has been made, with the objective of analysing the behaviour of each surface. Results show that the influence of the angle of inclination is higher than the influence of layer thickness; post-processing, also, affects to the trueness of the real roughness comparing to the predicted one obtaining more unpredictable results.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 959)
• Pages: 35-44
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-tN0Lzd
• Online since: October 2023
• Authors: Daniel Gallardo*, Mercedes Concha, Lucía-Candela Díaz, Roberto Jiménez, Marta Torralba, José Antonio Albajez, José Antonio Yagüe-Fabra
• Keywords: Additive Manufacturing, Surface Roughness, X-Ray Computed Tomography

References

[1] I. Gibson, D. Rosen, B. Stucker, Additive Manufacturing Technologies. 3D Printing, Rapid Prototyping, and Direct Digital Manufacturing, Second edition, Springer, 2015.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3

[2] R. Leach, S. Carmignato, Precision Metal Additive Manufacturing, 2021.

[3] H. Bikas, A.K. Lianos, P. Stavropoulos, A design framework for additive manufacturing, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 103 (2019) 3769–3783.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-019-03627-z

[4] K. Lussenburg, A. Sakes, P. Breedveld, Design of non-assembly mechanisms: A state-of-the-art review, Addit Manuf. 39 (2021).

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.101846

[5] S. Singh, S. Ramakrishna, R. Singh, Material issues in additive manufacturing: A review, J Manuf Process. 25 (2017) 185–200.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.11.006

[6] W. Sun, S. Brown, R. Leach, An overview of industrial X-ray computed tomography, 2012.

[7] H. Villarraga-Gómez, E.L. Herazo, S.T. Smith, X-ray computed tomography: from medical imaging to dimensional metrology, Precis Eng. 60 (2019) 544–569.

DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.03.007

[8] A. Cantatore, P. Müller, Introduction to computed tomography, 2011.

[9] P. Hermanek, S. Carmignato, Reference object for evaluating the accuracy of porosity measurements by X-ray computed tomography, Case Studies in Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation. 6 (2016) 122–127.

DOI: 10.1016/j.csndt.2016.05.003

[10] W. Sun, C. Giusca, S. Lou, X. Yang, X. Chen, T. Fry, X. Jiang, A. Wilson, S. Brown, H. Boulter, Establishment of X-ray computed tomography traceability for additively manufactured surface texture evaluation, Addit Manuf. 50 (2022).

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102558

[11] R.K. Leach, D. Bourell, S. Carmignato, A. Donmez, N. Senin, W. Dewulf, Geometrical metrology for metal additive manufacturing, CIRP Annals. 68 (2019) 677–700.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2019.05.004

[12] A. Townsend, L. Pagani, P. Scott, L. Blunt, Areal surface texture data extraction from X-ray computed tomography reconstructions of metal additively manufactured parts, Precis Eng. 48 (2017) 254–264.

DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.12.008

[13] M.A. de Pastre, A. Thompson, Y. Quinsat, J.A. Albajez García, N. Senin, R. Leach, Polymer powder bed fusion surface texture measurement, Meas Sci Technol. 31 (2020).

DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/ab63b1

[14] I. Dzullijah, D. Songlin, S. Shoujin, Roughness Prediction For FDM Produced Surfaces, in: International Institute of Engineers, 2014.

DOI: 10.15242/iie.e0214527

[15] I. Buj-Corral, A. Domínguez-Fernández, R. Durán-Llucià, Influence of Print Orientation on Surface Roughness in Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Processes, Materials. 12 (2019) 3834.

DOI: 10.3390/ma12233834

[16] Geometrical product specifications (GPS). Surface texture: Profile. Part 3: Specification operators (ISO 21920-3:2021), 2021. www.iso.org.

DOI: 10.3403/30398216

[17] A. Townsend, R. Racasan, L. Blunt, Surface-specific additive manufacturing test artefacts, Surf Topogr. 6 (2018).

DOI: 10.1088/2051-672X/aabcaf

[18] J. Metelkova, L. Vanmunster, H. Haitjema, B. van Hooreweder, Texture of inclined up-facing surfaces in laser powder bed fusion of metals, Addit Manuf. 42 (2021).

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.101970