Study of Abaca/Carbon/Epoxy Hybrid Composite Properties as an Alternative Prosthetic Socket Material

Article Preview

Abstract:

Composites of natural fiber-reinforced thermoplastic and thermoset polymers have been studied for developing prosthetic socket materials. This study investigated the abaca fiber (AF)/carbon fiber (CF)/epoxy (EP) hybrid composite properties: i.e., tensile, flexural, impact, thermal, and water absorption, by varying AF and CF ratios of 1: 0, 0: 1, 2: 1, 3: 1, and 4: 1 with 80 vol% epoxy resin. The cracks formed in bending test specimens were characterized with an optical microscope, whereas the tensile fracture surface was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results confirmed that the mechanical properties of the CF/EP composite are the highest. The higher the AF/CF ratio, the lower the hybrid composite's mechanical properties and the higher the water absorption. The hybrid composite with a 2:1 AF/CF ratio achieved the highest tensile and flexural strengths of 70 MPa and 103 MPa, respectively, and the lowest water absorption of 7.89%. Based on the experimental results, a simulation of the prosthetic socket was performed using Autodesk Inventor 2019 integrated with ANSYS Workbench 2019 R1, resulting in von Mises stress of 2.14 MPa and deformation of 0.015 mm. Besides, its thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) resulted in good thermal stability.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

95-102

Citation:

Online since:

March 2024

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2024 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. H. Nurhanisah, F. Hashemi, M. T. Paridah, M. Jawaid, and J. Naveen: IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. Vol. 368 (1) (2018) p.012050.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/368/1/012050

Google Scholar

[2] A. P. Irawan, T. P. Soemardi, K. Widjajalaksmi, and A. H. S. Reksoprodjo: Int. J. Mech. Mater. Eng. Vol. 6 (1) (2011) p.46

Google Scholar

[3] L.G. Kitila and D. W. Wolla: J. Compos. Mater. Vol. 56 (10) (2022) p.1605

Google Scholar

[4] S. Abdulrahman, Q. Hamad, and J. Oleiwi: Eng. Technol. J. Vol. 39 (11) (2021) p.1625

Google Scholar

[5] J. Odusote and V. Kumar: J. Eng. Technol. Vol. 6 (1) (2016) p.24

Google Scholar

[6] C.S. Malalli and B. R. Ramji: Mater. Today Proc. Vol. 62 (2022) p.3435

Google Scholar

[7] S. Vigneshwaran, R. Sundarakanan, K. M. John, et al.: J. Clean. Prod. Vol. 277 (2020) p.124109

Google Scholar

[8] H. Sosiati, N.D.M. Yuniar, D. Saputra, and S. Hamdan: Evergreen. Vol. 9 (1) (2022) p.32

Google Scholar

[9] H. Sosiati, M. Guntur Ma'arif, W. A. Firmansyah, and S. Hamdan: Mater. Sci. Forum. Vol. 1087 (2023) p.13

Google Scholar

[10] C. Budiyantoro, H. Sosiati, K. A. Syahputra, and S. Sudarisman: Semesta Tek. Vol. 26 (1) (2023) p.106

Google Scholar

[11] M. Akram Khan, S. Guru, P. Padmakaran, D. Mishra, M. Mudgal, and S. Dhakad: Compos. Interfaces. Vol. 18 (6) p.527

DOI: 10.1163/156855411x610250

Google Scholar

[12] B.V. Sunil Kumar, N.V. Londe, A.O. Surendranathan, and K. Anilas: IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. Vol. 376 (1) (2018) p.012047.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/376/1/012047

Google Scholar

[13] M. Brebu: Polymers. Vol. 12 (1) (2020) p.166

Google Scholar

[14] J.K. Oleiwi, Q. A. Hamad, and S. A. Abdulrahman: Mater. Today Proc. Vol. 56 (2022) p.3121

Google Scholar

[15] M. Mittal: Int. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Vol. 7 (1) (2019) p.1

Google Scholar

[16] S.W. Saragih, B. Wirjosentono, Eddiyanto, and Y. Meliana: Case Stud. Therm. Eng. Vol. 22 (2020) p.100740

Google Scholar

[17] H. Sosiati, A.M. Rizky, A.L.M. Latief, R.K. Adi, and S. Hamdan: Mater. Res. Express. Vol. 10 (3) (2023) p.035301

DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/acbb57

Google Scholar