Improving the Fatigue Performance of Binder Jet Manufactured 316L by Severe Shot Peening Surface Modification

Article Preview

Abstract:

Binder jetting is a rapidly evolving additive manufacturing technique, challenging the dominance of laser powder bed fusion in metal fabrication. This study focuses on the material properties of austenitic stainless steel 316L produced via binder jet technology. Porosity remains a significant challenge across additive manufacturing methods, adversely affecting material properties and fatigue life. To address this issue, we propose a novel approach employing severe shot peening as a post-processing treatment to enhance the material's characteristics. Microstructural analysis, including electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), coupled with tensile testing, was conducted to evaluate the mechanical properties. Additionally, fatigue behavior was investigated under both axial and flexural bending loading conditions. The results revealed a substantial increase in material strength achievable through the post-treatment. Notably, the fatigue limit of the material in bending fatigue was elevated from 120 MPa to 190 MPa, indicating a significant enhancement in fatigue performance. This study contributes new insights into the enhancement of fatigue resistance in binder jet-manufactured 316L stainless steel through surface modification techniques. The findings underscore the potential of severe shot peening as an effective strategy to improve material properties and expand the applicability of binder jet printing in demanding industrial applications.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

101-108

Citation:

Online since:

October 2024

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2024 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Yongyun Zhang, Ensheng Feng, Wei Mo, Yonghu Lv, Rui Ma, Shulong Ye, Xiaogang Wang, and Peng Yu. On the microstructures and fatigue behaviors of 316l stainless steel metal injection molded with gas- and water-atomized powders. Metals, 8(11):893, nov 2018.

DOI: 10.3390/met8110893

Google Scholar

[2] T.T. Wohlers, Wohlers Associates (Firm), R.I. Campbell, O. Diegel, J. Kowen, R. Huff, N. Mostow, I. Fidan, D.L. Bourell, J. Van Rensburg, et al. Wohlers Report 2022: 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing Global State of the Industry. Wohlers Associates, 2022.

DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v24.a0006555

Google Scholar

[3] Amir Mostafaei, Amy M. Elliott, John E. Barnes, Fangzhou Li, Wenda Tan, Corson L. Cramer, Peeyush Nandwana, and Markus Chmielus. Binder jet 3d printing-process parameters, materials, properties, modeling, and challenges. Progress in Materials Science, 119:100707, jun 2021.

DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100707

Google Scholar

[4] Nora Lecis, Marco Mariani, Ruben Beltrami, Lorena Emanuelli, Riccardo Casati, Maurizio Vedani, and Alberto Molinari. Effects of process parameters, debinding and sintering on the microstructure of 316l stainless steel produced by binder jetting. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 828:142108, nov 2021.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.142108

Google Scholar

[5] Saereh Mirzababaei, Brian K. Paul, and Somayeh Pasebani. Microstructure-property relationship in binder jet produced and vacuum sintered 316 l. Additive Manufacturing, 53:102720, may 2022.

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2022.102720

Google Scholar

[6] Andrea Avanzini. Fatigue behavior of additively manufactured stainless steel 316l. Materials, 16(1):65, dec 2022.

DOI: 10.3390/ma16010065

Google Scholar

[7] Katerina Kimes, Kyle Myers, Andrew Klein, Magnus Ahlfors, Erica Stevens, and Markus Chmielus. Binder jet 3d printing of 316l stainless steel: Effects of HIP on fatigue. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 25(S2):2600-2601, aug 2019.

DOI: 10.1017/s1431927619013734

Google Scholar

[8] Waqas Muhammad, Rasim Batmaz, Arunkumar Natarajan, and Etienne Martin. Effect of binder jetting microstructure variability on low cycle fatigue behavior of 316l. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 839:142820, apr 2022.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2022.142820

Google Scholar

[9] Punit Kumar, R. Jayaraj, J. Suryawanshi, U.R. Satwik, J. McKinnell, and U. Ramamurty. Fatigue strength of additively manufactured 316l austenitic stainless steel. Acta Materialia, 199:225-239, oct 2020.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.08.033

Google Scholar

[10] Mohammad Jamalkhani, Bradley Nathan, Mike Heim, Dave Nelson, and Amir Mostafaei. Fatigue behavior of vacuum-sintered binder jetted fine 316l stainless steel powder. Materials Science and Engineering: A, page 144937, apr 2023.[11] Tejas Gundgire, Tuomas Jokiaho, Suvi Santa-aho, Timo Rautio, Antti Järvenpää, and Minnamari Vippola. Comparative study of additively manufactured and reference 316 l stainless steel samples - effect of severe shot peening on microstructure and residual stresses. Materials Characterization, 191:112162, sep 2022.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2022.112162

Google Scholar

[12] Timo Rautio, Matias Jaskari, Tejas Gundgire, Terho Iso-Junno, Minnamari Vippola, and Antti Järvenpää. The effect of severe shot peening on fatigue life of laser powder bed fusion manufactured 316l stainless steel. Materials, 15(10):3517, may 2022.

DOI: 10.3390/ma15103517

Google Scholar