Comparison of the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Ti-3573 and Ti-3873 Alloy after Solution Treatment

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this regard, two beta titanium alloys in the Ti-Al-Mo-V-Cr system, Ti-3Al-5Mo-7V-3Cr (Ti-3573) and Ti-3Al-8Mo-7V-3Cr (Ti-3873), have been designed. Comparison of the microstructure and mechanical properties of both alloys after solution treatment was conducted. The result shows that the β grains in Ti-3873 alloy are abnormally grown at WQ. The elongation of Ti-3573 alloy is higher than that of Ti-3873 alloy, it is related to the the smaller grain size. The Ti-3873 alloy has moderate plasticity but higher yield strength and tensile strength. Fine and deep dimples associated with ductile fracture were obtained for the Ti-3573 alloy. The fractography of the β-substrate specimens showed that the fracture mode was ductile fracture. The Ti-3873 alloy has a combination of slip and twinning during deformation. It is possible for the Ti-3573 alloy to undergo both twinning and TRIP effect upon deformation. Therefore, Ti-3573 alloy exhibited good plasticity and strength matching.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1003)

Pages:

60-66

Citation:

Online since:

July 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Y. Kawano, T. Ohashi, T. Mayama, et al. Materials Transactions. 60 (6) (2019) 959-968.

Google Scholar

[2] Q. Wang, S. Xu, J. Lecomte, Acta Mater. 183 (15) (2020) 329-339.

Google Scholar

[3] Z. Zheng, P. Eisenlohr, T. R. Bieler, et al. JOM. 72 (1) (2020) 39-47.

Google Scholar

[4] H. Schwab, M. Bönisch, L. Giebeler, et al. Mater. Des. 130 (2017) 83-89.

Google Scholar

[5] D. Raabe, B. Sander. M.Friák, et al. Acta Mater. 55 (13) (2007) 4475-4487.

Google Scholar

[6] F. Sun, J. Y. Zhang, M. Marteleur, et al. Scripta Mater. 94 (2015) 17-20.

Google Scholar

[7] S. Neelakantan, D. S. Martin, et al. Mater. Sci. Technol. 25 (11) (2009) 1351-1358.

Google Scholar

[8] C. Brozek, F. Sun, P. Vermaut, et al. Scripta Mater. 114 (2016) 60-64.

Google Scholar

[9] X. H. Min, S. Emura, N. Sekido, et al. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 527 (10-11) (2010) 2693-2701.

Google Scholar

[10] S. Sadeghpour, S. M. Abbasi, M. Morakabati. et al. J.Alloys Compd. 746 (2018) 206-217.

Google Scholar

[11] O. M. Ivasishin, P. E. Markovsky, Y. V. Matviychuk, et al. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 34 (1) (2003) 147-158.

Google Scholar

[12] C. Herrera, D. Ponge, D. Raabe, Acta Mater. 59 (11) (2011) 4653-4664.

Google Scholar

[13] D. Y. Qin, Y. F. Lu, Q. Liu, et al. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 572 (2013) 19-24.

Google Scholar

[14] S. Sadeghpour, S. M. Abbasi, M. Morakabati, et al. Mater. Des. 121 (2017) 24-35.

Google Scholar