The Effects of Henna Fillers on the Properties of Polyurethane Foam Composites

Article Preview

Abstract:

Polyurethane (PU) foam were produced from polyol (PolyGreen R3110) and 4,4- diphenylmethane diisocyanate (Maskiminate 80) with distilled water as a blowing agent. Natural fibers have received more attention from researchers due to their ability to increase the properties of the polymer composites. In this work, PU/Henna foam composites were prepared by used Henna fibers at different loading of 5, 10, 15 and 20 wt. %. The effect of different Henna loading on PU foam were investigated by density, compression test, morphology and water absorption. Core density of PU/Henna foam composites increased with addition Henna compared to control PU and showed highest core density of 85.10 kgm-3. Compressive strength decreased to 0.53 MPa after Henna addition at 5 % PU/Henna foam composites. Henna addition to 20 % PU/Henna foam composites were reduced the compressive strength to 0.97 MPa due to stiffness effect of Henna that contributed to embrittlement of the cell wall. The distorted cell wall and less uniform of cell structure were proved by SEM due to Henna addition as compared to control PU. Water absorption percentage of PU/Henna foam composites were increased with Henna addition as compared to control PU. It is because hydrophilic properties of Henna tendency to absorb moisture.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1010)

Pages:

520-525

Citation:

Online since:

September 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Sivertsen, K. (2007). Polymer foams. 3.063 Polymer Physics, p.1–2.

Google Scholar

[2] Bledzki, A. K., Zhang, W., and Chate, A. (2001). Natural-fibre-reinforced polyurethane microfoams. Composites Science and Technology, 61(16), p.2405–2411.

DOI: 10.1016/s0266-3538(01)00129-4

Google Scholar

[3] Suleman, S. et al. (2014). Synthesis and Characterization of Flexible and Rigid Polyurethane Foam, 2(5), p.701–710.

Google Scholar

[4] Choe, K. H., Lee, D. S., Seo, W. J., and Kim, W. N. (2004). Properties of Rigid Polyurethane Foams with Blowing Agents and Catalysts. Polymer Journal 36(5), pp.368-373.

DOI: 10.1295/polymj.36.368

Google Scholar

[5] Sibel, D., Fatma, E., Ecem, A., Huseyin, A. K., and Ozgur, M. S. (2017). Natural Fiber Reinforced Polyurethane Rigid Foam, GU J Sci 30(2), pp.97-109.

Google Scholar

[6] Srinivas, K., Naidu, A. L., and Rajubahubalendruni, M. V. A. (2017). A Review on Chemical and Mechanical Properties of Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites, International Journal of Performability Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp.189-200.

DOI: 10.23940/ijpe.17.02.p8.189200

Google Scholar

[7] Mohammed, L., Ansari, M. N. M., Pua, G., Jawaid, M., and Islam, M. S. (2015). International Journal of Polymer Science. Volume 2015, Article ID 243947.

Google Scholar

[8] Kaur, R., and Kumar, M. (2013). Function of silicon oil in the castor oil based rigid polyurethane foams. Journal of Polymer Engineering, 33(9).

DOI: 10.1515/polyeng-2013-0083

Google Scholar

[9] Kalia, S., Kaith, B. S. R., and Kaur, I. (2009). Pretreatments of Natural Fibers and their Application as Reinforcing Material in Polymer Composites-A Review. Journal of Polymer Engineering and Science, Vol. 49(7), pp.1253-1272.

DOI: 10.1002/pen.21328

Google Scholar

[10] Nur Azni, M. A., Sinar A. A., Firuz Z., and Supri A. G. (2013). Characterization and Mechanical Properties of Biomass Polyurethane.

Google Scholar

[11] David, N. V., and Azlan, M. (2018). Moisture Absorption Properties and Shock Cushioning Characteristics of Bio-Based Polyurethane Foam Composites. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Vol SI 5(2), pp.157-168.

Google Scholar