Study of the Impact of the Synergic Line and the Strategy of Conception on Ti-6Al-4V Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing Process (WAAM-CMT)

Article Preview

Abstract:

In additive manufacturing, technologies based on the fusion of a metallic wire using an electric arc represent an interesting alternative to current manufacturing processes, particularly for large metal parts, thanks to higher deposition rates and lower process costs than powder or wire-laser technologies. A versatile 3D printing device using a DED-W Arc (Direct Energy Deposition by wire-arc) station to melt a metallic filler wire is developed to build titanium parts by optimizing the process parameters and control the geometrical, metallurgical and the mechanical properties of produced parts. In this study, the impact of two different CMT synergic lines on the energetic and geometric behavior of Ti-6Al-4V single deposits is highlighted. These are related to first order parameters: wire feed speed (WFS) and travel speed (TS). The results show difference on energy, geometric of deposits and different deposition regime between these two law with identical process parameters. The second part of this study focuses on the transition from single deposits to walls and blocks. By first choosing the best set of process parameters to make the construction of thin walls (composed of stacked layers), and then the research the optimal horizontal step of deposition (overlapping) for thicker constructions, results obtained made it possible to validate transition from single deposits (1D) to thick walls (3D) without any weld pool collapse or lack of fusion.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1016)

Pages:

250-255

Citation:

Online since:

January 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. W. Williams, F. Martina, A. C. Addison, J. Ding, G. Pardal & P. Colegrove 2016, Wire+Arc additive manufacturing. Mater Sci Technol 32 : 641-647.

DOI: 10.1179/1743284715y.0000000073

Google Scholar

[2] G.C. Anzalone, C.L. Zhang, B. Wijnen, P.G. Sanders, J.M. Pearce, A Low-Cost Open-Source Metal 3-D Printer, IEEE Access 1 (2013) 803-810.

DOI: 10.1109/access.2013.2293018

Google Scholar

[3] ASTM F3187-16, Standard Guide for Diected Energy Deposition of Metals, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2016).

Google Scholar

[4] M. A. Jacskon, A. Van Asten, J.D. Morrow, S. Min, F.E. Pfefferkorn, A Comparison of Energy Consumption in Wire-Based and Powder-Based Additive-Subtractive Manufacturing, Procedia Manuf 5 (2016) 989-1005.

DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2016.08.087

Google Scholar

[5] D. D. Gu, W, Meiners, K. Wissenbach, R. Poprawe, Laser additive manufacturing of metallic components: materials, processes and mechanisms, International Materials Reviews 57(3) (2012) 133-164.

DOI: 10.1179/1743280411y.0000000014

Google Scholar

[6] J. Guo, Y. Zhou, C. Liu, Q. Wu, X. Chen, J. Lu, Wire arc additive manufacturing of AZ31 magnesium alloy: Grain refinement by adjusting pulse frequency, Materials 9 (2016) 823-836.

DOI: 10.3390/ma9100823

Google Scholar

[7] J. O. Milewski, Lasers, Electron Beams, Plasma Arcs, Additive Manufacturing of Metals, Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp.85-97.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58205-4_5

Google Scholar

[8] H. P. Tang, M. Qian, N. Liu, X.Z. Zhang, G.Y. Yang, J. Wang, Effect of Powder Reuse Times on Additive Manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V by Selective Electron Beam Melting, JOM 67(3) (2015) 555-563.

DOI: 10.1007/s11837-015-1300-4

Google Scholar

[9] F. Martina, S. Williams, Wire+ arc additive manufacturing vs. traditional machining from solid: a cost comparison, Cranfield University (2015).

Google Scholar

[10] A. Ayed, A. Valencia, G. Bras, H. Bernard, P. Michaud, Y. Balcaen, J. Alexis, Effects of WAAM process parameters on Metallurgical and Mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V deposits, Advances in Materials, Mechanics and Manufacturing, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, (2019).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-24247-3_4

Google Scholar

[11] J. Xiong, G. Zhang, H. Gao, et L. Wu, Modeling of bead section profile and overlapping beads with experimental validation for robotic GMAW-based rapid manufacturing, Robotics and computer-integrated Manufacturing 26 (2013) 417-423.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2012.09.011

Google Scholar

[12] D. Ding, Z. Pan, D. Cuiri, et H. Li, A multi-bead overlapping model for robotic wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM), Robotics and computer-integrated Manufacturing 31 (2015) 101-110.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2014.08.008

Google Scholar