An Attempt to Develop Aerobic Granular Sludge in Continuous Airlift Reactors

Article Preview

Abstract:

Recent advancement on biological wastewater treatment is via granular sludge technology. It is widely known that, aerobic granular sludge has been developed in a batch operation since its discovery. Yet, most of the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) is operated in continuous mode. Now, the real challenge is how to adopt the granular technology while maintaining present operation mode of WWTP. Thus, this study attempts to evaluate the feasibility of developing aerobic granular sludge in continuous airlift reactors feed with two different substrates, namely glucose and acetate. Two identical airlift reactors (6 L) were employed and operated at room temperature (30°C). Prior to the substrate feeding, both reactors were inoculated with seed sludge obtained from a palm oil mill anaerobic pond. One of the reactors was fed with 2000 mg COD L-1 of glucose (ALR1) and the other reactor with 2000 mg COD L-1 of acetate (ALR2). The hydraulic retention time (HRT) and organic loading rate (OLR) for both reactors were maintained at 4 days and between 0.2 to 0.5 kg m-3day-1 respectively. Dissolved oxygen was maintained between 5.0 and 6.0 mg O2L-1 and supplied by air compressor. The reactor performance was monitored based on COD removal. Aerobic granules developed throughout the study period was evaluated based on granules size and morphology, sludge volumetric index (SVI30) and SVI5/SVI30 ratio analysis. Results showed that ALR1 demonstrated the formation of filamentous-type aerobic granules with most of the SVI30 average at 100 to 190 mL g-1. Ratio SVI5/SVI30 analysis was evaluated at 0.2 and 0.5. The largest granules size obtained during the experiment was about 600 μm on day-136 and average granules size obtained at 200 to 400 μm. ALR1 able to achieve 95% COD removal. For ALR2, round shaped aerobic granules were developed with average SVI30 from 100 to 1000 mLg-1. SVI5/SVI30 analysis indicated an average ratio between 0.7 and 0.9. The average granules size was between 30 to 50 μm and the largest was 78 μm on day-60. 90% of COD removal efficiency was obtained in ALR2. In conclusion, ALR fed with acetate had indicated better aerobic granules characteristics as compared to glucose fed reactor. Furthermore, the study demonstrated that to develop aerobic granules in continuous reactors is feasible.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1025)

Pages:

265-272

Citation:

Online since:

March 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Iskandar, M. J., Baharum, A., Anuar, F. H., & Othaman, R. (2017). Palm oil industry in South East Asia and the effluent treatment technology—A review. Environmental Technology & Innovation.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2017.11.003

Google Scholar

[2] Gao, D., Liu, L., Liang, H., & Wu, W. M. (2011). Aerobic granular sludge: characterization, mechanism of granulation and application to wastewater treatment. Critical reviews in biotechnology, 31(2), 137-152.

DOI: 10.3109/07388551.2010.497961

Google Scholar

[3] Margot, J., Lochmatter, S., Barry, D. A., & Holliger, C. (2016). Role of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in micropollutant removal from wastewater with aerobic granular sludge. Water Science and Technology, 73(3), 564-575.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.2015.514

Google Scholar

[4] Liu, L., Li, W. W., Sheng, G. P., Liu, Z. F., Zeng, R. J., Liu, J. X., ... & Lee, D. J. (2010). Microscale hydrodynamic analysis of aerobic granules in the mass transfer process. Environmental science & technology, 44(19), 7555-7560.

DOI: 10.1021/es1021608

Google Scholar

[5] Jemaat, Z., Suárez-Ojeda, M. E., Pérez, J., & Carrera, J. (2013). Simultaneous nitritation and p-nitrophenol removal using aerobic granular biomass in a continuous airlift reactor. Bioresource technology, 150, 307-313.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.10.005

Google Scholar

[6] Jemaat, Z., Suárez-Ojeda, M. E., Pérez, J., & Carrera, J. (2014). Sequentially alternating pollutant scenarios of phenolic compounds in a continuous aerobic granular sludge reactor performing simultaneous partial nitritation and o-cresol biodegradation. Bioresource technology, 161, 354-361.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.071

Google Scholar

[7] Ramos, C., Suárez-Ojeda, M. E., & Carrera, J. (2016). Long-term performance and stability of a continuous granular airlift reactor treating a high-strength wastewater containing a mixture of aromatic compounds. Journal of hazardous materials, 303, 154-161.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.10.031

Google Scholar

[8] Sarma, S. J., & Tay, J. H. (2018). Aerobic granulation for future wastewater treatment technology: challenges ahead. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 4(1), 9-15.

DOI: 10.1039/c7ew00148g

Google Scholar

[9] Franca, R. D., Pinheiro, H. M., van Loosdrecht, M. C., & Lourenço, N. D. (2018). Stability of aerobic granules during long-term bioreactor operation. Biotechnology Advances, 36(1), 228-246.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.11.005

Google Scholar

[10] Zhou, D., Liu, M., Wang, J., Dong, S., Cui, N., & Gao, L. (2013). Granulation of activated sludge in a continuous flow airlift reactor by strong drag force. Biotechnology and bioprocess engineering, 18(2), 289-299.

DOI: 10.1007/s12257-012-0513-4

Google Scholar

[11] Long, B., Yang, C. Z., Pu, W. H., Yang, J. K., Liu, F. B., Zhang, L., & Cheng, K. (2015). Rapid cultivation of aerobic granular sludge in a continuous flow reactor. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 3(4), 2966-2973.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2015.10.001

Google Scholar

[12] Devlin, T. R., & Oleszkiewicz, J. A. (2018). Cultivation of aerobic granular sludge in continuous flow under various selective pressure. Bioresource technology, 253, 281-287.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.056

Google Scholar

[13] Qi, K., Li, Z., Zhang, C., Tan, X., Wan, C., Liu, X., ... & Lee, D. J. (2020). Biodegradation of real industrial wastewater containing ethylene glycol by using aerobic granular sludge in a continuous-flow reactor: Performance and resistance mechanism. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 107711.

DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2020.107711

Google Scholar

[14] Juang, Y. C., Adav, S. S., Lee, D. J., & Tay, J. H. (2010). Stable aerobic granules for continuous-flow reactors: precipitating calcium and iron salts in granular interiors. Bioresource Technology, 101(21), 8051-8057.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.078

Google Scholar

[15] Liu, H., Li, Y., Yang, C., Pu, W., He, L., & Bo, F. (2012). Stable aerobic granules in continuous-flow bioreactor with self-forming dynamic membrane. Bioresource Technology, 121, 111-118.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.07.016

Google Scholar

[16] Jemaat, Z., Suárez-Ojeda, M. E., Pérez, J., & Carrera, J. (2014). Partial nitritation and o-cresol removal with aerobic granular biomass in a continuous airlift reactor. Water research, 48, 354-362.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.048

Google Scholar

[17] Cozma, P., & Gavrilescu, M. (2012). Airlift reactors: applications in wastewater treatment. Environmental Engineering & Management Journal (EEMJ), 11(8).

DOI: 10.30638/eemj.2012.189

Google Scholar

[18] van Loosdrecht, M. C., Nielsen, P. H., Lopez-Vazquez, C. M., & Brdjanovic, D. (Eds.). (2016). Experimental methods in wastewater treatment. IWA publishing.

Google Scholar

[19] Kent, T. R., Bott, C. B., & Wang, Z. W. (2018). State of the art of aerobic granulation in continuous flow bioreactors. Biotechnology advances.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.03.015

Google Scholar

[20] de Sousa Rollemberg, S. L., de Oliveira, L. Q., Barros, A. R. M., Melo, V. M. M., Firmino, P. I. M., & dos Santos, A. B. (2019). Effects of carbon source on the formation, stability, bioactivity and biodiversity of the aerobic granule sludge. Bioresource technology, 278, 195-204.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.071

Google Scholar

[21] Liu, Y., Liu, Z., Wang, F., Chen, Y., Kuschk, P., & Wang, X. (2014). Regulation of aerobic granular sludge reformulation after granular sludge broken: effect of poly aluminum chloride (PAC). Bioresource technology, 158, 201-208.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.002

Google Scholar

[22] Chen, Y. Y., Ju, S. P., & Lee, D. J. (2016). Aerobic granulation of protein-rich granules from nitrogen-lean wastewaters. Bioresource Technology, 218, 469-475.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.120

Google Scholar

[23] Long, B., Yang, C. Z., Pu, W. H., Yang, J. K., Liu, F. B., Zhang, L., Cheng, K. (2015). Tolerance to organic loading rate by aerobic granular sludge in a cyclic aerobic granular reactor. Bioresource technology, 182, 314-322.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.029

Google Scholar

[24] Tay, J. H., Liu, Q. S., & Liu, Y. (2002). Characteristics of aerobic granules grown on glucose and acetate in sequential aerobic sludge blanket reactors. Environmental technology, 23(8), 931-936.

DOI: 10.1080/09593332308618363

Google Scholar

[25] Du, S., Zhang, Z. H., Zhang, Y. F., & Jian, P. C. (2011). Characteristics of aerobic granular sludge cultivated by promoting and inhibiting filamentous bacteria. In Advanced Materials Research (Vol. 183, pp.1075-1079). Trans Tech Publications Ltd.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.183-185.1075

Google Scholar