Degassing Process Influence on Tensile Strength of Neat E132 Epoxy Polymeric Materials

Article Preview

Abstract:

During the composite’s fabrication process, one of the most common defect occurs is void. Numerous literatures have suggested that the presence of void negatively affect its mechanical properties and effective degassing process is one the solutions for such issue. In this study, experiments were carried out using neat E132 epoxy to investigate the effects of different degassing process (hot water, ultrasonic bath, and vacuum) on its tensile strength. The duration of its process was carried out from 5 – 9 minutes for hot water and ultrasonic bath where vacuum process was extended until 10 minutes to observed limiting behavior. It is found that the vacuum degassing method is the most effective. Vacuum degassing process displayed the least formation of bubble and micro voids even for 10 minutes. It is also revealed that vacuum degassing process resulted the highest average tensile strength at 48.8MPa. Such findings would facilitate the well bonded effective nanocomposite fabrication process.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1026)

Pages:

129-135

Citation:

Online since:

April 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. K. Rawat, N. Kukreja, S. K. Gupta, Effect of reinforcing micro sized aluminium oxide particles on mechanical properties of polymer based composite Materials Today: Proceedings, (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.260

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Guo, K. Ruan, X. Shi, X. Yang, J. Gu, Factors affecting thermal conductivities of the polymers and polymer composites: A review Composites Science and Technology 193, 108134 (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108134

Google Scholar

[3] A. Sharma, M. Thakur, M. Bhattacharya, T. Mandal, S. Goswami, Commercial application of cellulose nano-composites – A review Biotechnology Reports 21, e00316 (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.btre.2019.e00316

Google Scholar

[4] C. Acquah, M. K. Danquah, C. K. S. Moy, M. Anwar, C. M. Ongkudon, Thermogravimetric characterization of ex situ polymethacrylate (EDMA-co-GMA) monoliths The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 95, 1345-1351 (2017).

DOI: 10.1002/cjce.22781

Google Scholar

[5] H. Ribeiro et al., Higher thermal conductivity and mechanical enhancements in hybrid 2D polymer nanocomposites Polymer Testing 87, 106510 (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106510

Google Scholar

[6] M. Asyraf, M. Anwar, L. M. Sheng, M. K. Danquah, Recent Development of Nanomaterial-Doped Conductive Polymers JOM 69, 2515-2523 (2017).

DOI: 10.1007/s11837-017-2628-8

Google Scholar

[7] R. Scaffaro, L. Botta, in Book, S. Thomas, R. Shanks, S. Chandrasekharakurup, Eds. (William Andrew Publishing, Oxford, 2014), pp.133-160.

Google Scholar

[8] W. He, P. Song, B. Yu, Z. Fang, H. Wang, Flame retardant polymeric nanocomposites through the combination of nanomaterials and conventional flame retardants Progress in Materials Science 114, 100687 (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100687

Google Scholar

[9] S. Pourhashem, F. Saba, J. Duan, A. Rashidi, F. Guan, E. G. Nezhad, B. Hou, Polymer/Inorganic nanocomposite coatings with superior corrosion protection performance: A review Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2020.04.029

Google Scholar

[10] J. Jung, H. A. Sodano, High strength epoxy nanocomposites reinforced by epoxy functionalized aramid nanofibers Polymer, 122438 (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122438

Google Scholar

[11] S. Khandelwal, K. Y. Rhee, Recent advances in basalt-fiber-reinforced composites: Tailoring the fiber-matrix interface Composites Part B: Engineering 192, 108011 (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108011

Google Scholar

[12] J. George, H. Ishida, A review on the very high nanofiller-content nanocomposites: Their preparation methods and properties with high aspect ratio fillers Progress in Polymer Science 86, 1-39 (2018).

DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.07.006

Google Scholar

[13] N. Patel, P. Jain, An investigation on mechanical properties in randomly oriented short natural fiber reinforced composites Materials Today: Proceedings, (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.452

Google Scholar

[14] R. Kumar, A. Anand, Tribological behavior of natural fiber reinforced epoxy based composites: A review Materials Today: Proceedings 18, 3247-3251 (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.200

Google Scholar

[15] V. V. Vasiliev, E. V. Morozov, in Book, V. V. Vasiliev, E. V. Morozov, Eds. (Elsevier, 2018), pp. xvii-xxv.

Google Scholar

[16] A. Selmi, paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology (ICETET'2014), May 30-31, 2014 London (United Kingdom), (2014).

DOI: 10.15242/iie.e0514572

Google Scholar

[17] M. Mehdikhani, L. Gorbatikh, I. Verpoest, S. V. Lomov, Voids in fiber-reinforced polymer composites: A review on their formation, characteristics, and effects on mechanical performance Journal of Composite Materials 53, 1579-1669 (2018).

DOI: 10.1177/0021998318772152

Google Scholar

[18] Xueshu Liu, F. Chen, A Review of Void Formation and its Effects on theMechanical Performance of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic Engineering Transactions, 33-51 (2016).

Google Scholar

[19] H. Zhang, R. Ma, D. Luo, W. Xu, Y. Zhao, X. Zhao, Y. Gao, L. Zhang, Understanding the cavitation and crazing behavior in the polymer nanocomposite by tuning shape and size of nanofiller Polymer 188, 122103 (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.122103

Google Scholar

[20] Y. Gu, M. Li, Z. Zhang, Z. Sun, Void formation model and measuring method of void formation condition during hot pressing process Polymer Composites 31, 1562-1571 (2010).

DOI: 10.1002/pc.20944

Google Scholar

[21] L. Wu, S. V. Hoa, M.-T. Ton-That, Effects of water on the curing and properties of epoxy adhesive used for bonding FRP composite sheet to concrete Journal of Applied Polymer Science 92, 2261-2268 (2004).

DOI: 10.1002/app.20195

Google Scholar