Performance of Graphene Nanopowder with Deionised Water in EDM Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper emphasises the effect of the surfactant in the PMEDM process. The preparation of nanofluid is done by mixing and sonicating thoroughly into the deionised water is discussed. The effect of varying the graphene nanopowder concentration into the dielectric is also discussed. Also, the effect of surfactant SDS and CTAB in the machining process is elaborated at 0.1 and 0.2g per 800ml concentration. MRR improved by 21.27% and roughness by 18.91% at 0.2g and 8µs, 2A and 50V in 800ml deionised water. SDS provide better MRR and low roughness compared to CTAB at higher peak current and higher pulse on time Simultaneously, the addition of surfactant into the dielectric medium reduces the performance of the EDM process. The MRR varies from 21mg/min at 0g graphene to 45mg/min at 0.2g and then 31.81mg/min at 0.2g with 0.1g SDS, 43mg/min at 0.2g SDS, 28.33mg/min at 0.1g CTAB and 30mg/min at 0.2g CTAB. Debris size also varies with the input parameters.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1026)

Pages:

147-154

Citation:

Online since:

April 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Boothroyd G and Knight W A 1989 Fundamentals of Machining and Machine Tools vol 66 (New York).

Google Scholar

[2] Singh S, Maheshwari S and Pandey P C 2004 Some investigations into the electric discharge machining of hardened tool steel using different electrode materials J. Mater. Process. Technol. 149 272–7.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.11.046

Google Scholar

[3] Erden A and Bilgin S 1980 Role of Impurities in Electric Discharge Machining Proc. Twenty-Fourth Int. Mach. Tool Des. Res. Conf. 21 345–50.

Google Scholar

[4] Jeswani M L 1981 Effect of the addition of graphite powder to kerosene used as the dielectric fluid in electrical discharge machining Wear 70 133–9.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(81)90148-4

Google Scholar

[5] Kurafuji H and Suda K 1965 Study on Electrical Discharge machining I J. Fac. Eng. Univ. Tokyo(B) XXVIII 1–18.

Google Scholar

[6] Chow H M, Yang L D, Lin C T and Chen Y F 2008 The use of SiC powder in water as dielectric for micro-slit EDM machining J. Mater. Process. Technol. 195 160–70.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.04.130

Google Scholar

[7] Ekmekci B and Ersöz Y 2012 How suspended particles affect surface morphology in powder mixed electrical discharge machining (PMEDM) Metall. Mater. Trans. B Process Metall. Mater. Process. Sci. 43 1138–48.

DOI: 10.1007/s11663-012-9700-0

Google Scholar

[8] Kumar A, Mandal A, Dixit A R and Das A K 2018 Performance evaluation of Al2O3 nano powder mixed dielectric for electric discharge machining of Inconel 825 Mater. Manuf. Process. 33 986–95.

DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2017.1376081

Google Scholar

[9] Kumar A, Mandal A, Dixit A R, Das A K, Kumar S and Ranjan R 2019 Comparison in the performance of EDM and NPMEDM using Al 2 O 3 nanopowder as an impurity in DI water dielectric Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 100 1327–39.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-018-3126-z

Google Scholar

[10] Marashi H, Jafarlou D M, Sarhan A A D D and Hamdi M 2016 State of the art in powder mixed dielectric for EDM applications Precis. Eng. 46 11–33.

DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.05.010

Google Scholar

[11] Peças P and Henriques E 2008 Effect of the powder concentration and dielectric flow in the surface morphology in electrical discharge machining with powder-mixed dielectric (PMD-EDM) Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 37 1120–32.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-007-1061-5

Google Scholar

[12] Reddy V V, Kumar A, Valli P M and Reddy C S 2015 Influence of surfactant and graphite powder concentration on electrical discharge machining of PH17-4 stainless steel J. Brazilian Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 37 641–55.

DOI: 10.1007/s40430-014-0193-4

Google Scholar