Screening of Energy-Saving Technologies for Cement Production Based on Boston Consulting Group Matrix

Abstract:

Based on the analysis of the development situation of China’s cement industry and the BCG Matrix method, this paper classifies and screens 31 energy-saving technologies in China's cement production, and puts forward guiding suggestions for the application of energy-saving technologies for cement enterprises. The screening results show that the “Energy-efficient powder separation technology” and “New low-calcium cement clinker and production technology” are “double-high” technologies with excellent on both screening indicators. The investment energy saving rates are 17.5 tce/10,000 yuan (tons of standard coal equivalent per 10,000 yuan) and 10 tce/10,000 yuan. The promotion ratio increments are 35% and 25%. “Cement clinker energy-saving nitrogen reduction firing technology”, “Fan drive mode adopts high voltage frequency conversion speed control technology”, “Pure low temperature waste heat power generation technology for cement kiln” are “single-high” technologies with excellent on one of screening indicators. The investment energy saving rates are 0.3tce/10,000 yuan, 4.1tce/10,000 yuan, 3.9tce/10,000 yuan respectively. The promotion ratio increments are 19%, 35%, 31.5% respectively.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 1035)
• Pages: 988-998
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.1035.988
• Online since: June 2021
• Authors: Yu Chen Zhang, Xian Zheng Gong*, Yu Liu, Li Wei Zhou
• Keywords: Boston Consulting Group Matrix (BCG Matrix), Cement Industry, Energy-Saving Technology, Technology Screening

References

[1] Anonymous. China Cement Yearbook. 2016[M]. China Building Materials Industry Press, (2017).

[2] Cheng Yuhua. Analysis of the social and economic benefits of the implementation of energy consumption standards in the building materials industry[J]. Shanghai Construction Technology, 2015 (03): 74-76.

[3] Information on https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E6%A0%87%E5%87%86%E7%85%A4.

[4] Li Chen. Some views on carbon emission reduction work in cement industry[J]. China Cement, 2018 (12): 22-26.

[5] Interim measures for the promotion and management of energy-saving and low-carbon technologies[J]. China Resources Comprehensive Utilization, 2014, 32(01): 4-5.

[6] Liu Jianguo, Huang Tianyou, Wang Dongsheng. Casting industry, energy-saving emission reduction technology screening and evaluation of research [J]. Electromechanical Product Development and Innovation, 2012, 25(06): 21-22.

[7] Ma Hangtong, Yang Chunyan. Improving the Boston matrix based on toposable set method[J]. Mathematical Practice and Understanding, 2020, 50(12): 38-47.

[8] Yuan Bingyou, Lu Hongbo. Boston Matrix Application Extension Research[J]. Business and Management, 2012 (06): 85-89.

[9] Li Haibin,Wang Qionghai. Limitations, modifications and applications of Boston matrix analysis[J]. Journal of Science and Technology Innovation, 2009 (33): 199+201.

[10] Zhao Jin. The application of Boston matrix analysis in practical cases[J]. China High-Tech Enterprise, 2008 (08): 25.

[11] Ma Hangtong, Yang Chunyan. Improving the Boston matrix based on toposable set method [J]. Mathematical Practice and Understanding, 2020, 50(12): 38-47.

[12] Wang Yuping. Economic analysis of building energy saving and investment[J]. Shanxi Architecture, 2017, 43(18): 181-182.