How the Chemistry of Raw Materials Affects Aluminum Produced in Cells with Prebaked Anodes

Abstract:

This paper analyzes how major impurities found in raw materials affect the chemistry of primary aluminum. Alumina and prebaked anodes tend towards lower quality due to the depletion of natural sources of high-quality bauxites and using low-quality carbon to make prebaked anodes (PA). The authors analyzed the chemistry of raw materials supplied for electrolysis. The paper shows the investigated upward trends in the presence of Fe and Si impurities in alumina and prebaked anodes, which jeopardizes the aluminum production process. The increased presence of such materials worsens the chemical composition of the resulting liquid aluminum. If the finished product is to be of high quality, alumina and PA mast contain, respectively (wt.%): 0.010 and 0.024 Fe, 0.013 and 0.022 Si. The proposed idea is to categorize the alumina in storage. Alumina from different manufacturers must then be batched in such a way as to have consistent, ‘averaged’ chemistry before going to electrolysis cells.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 1052)
• Pages: 209-213
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-5hz514
• Online since: February 2022
• Authors: Nina V. Nemchinova, Aleksandr Yu. Lazko
• Keywords: Alumina, Aluminum Quality, Prebaked Anodes, Primary Aluminum Production

References

[1] J. Thonstad, P. Fellner, G.M. Haarberg, J. Híveš, H. Kvande, A. Sterten, Aluminium Electrolysis, 3rd edition, Aluminium Verlag, Dusseldorf, (2001).

[2] K. Grjotheim, B. Welch, Aluminium Smelter Technology, Aluminium Verlag, Dusseldorf, (1993).

[3] F. Yan, M. Dupuis, J. Zhou, S. Ruan, In depth analysis of energy-saving and current efficiency improvement of aluminum reduction cells, in: Light Metals. (2013) 537-543.

DOI: 10.1002/9781118663189.ch91

[4] V. Mann, V. Buzunov, N. Pitertsev, V. Chesnyak, P. Polyakov, Reduction in power consumption at UC Rusal's smelters 2012-2014, in: Light Metals. (2015) 757-762.

DOI: 10.1002/9781119093435.ch128

[5] V.U. Bazhin, A.D. Smol'nikov, P.A. Petrov, Concept of energy efficiency aluminum production Electrolysis 600+,, Intern. Research J. 5(3) (2016) 37-40.

[6] J. Haraldsson, M. Johansson, Review of measures for improved energy efficiency in production-related processes in the aluminium industry - From electrolysis to recycling, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 93 (2018) 525-548.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.043

[7] I.A. Rodionova, The shifts in the spatial structure of the world bauxite industry and Guinea's position in the industry, Revista ESPACIOS. 41(21) (2020) 11-21.

[8] O.A. Dubovikov, V.N. Brichkin, A.D. Ris, A.V. Sundurov, Thermochemical activation of hydrated aluminosilicates and its importance for alumina production, Non-Ferrous Metals. 2 (2018) 11-16.

DOI: 10.17580/nfm.2018.02.02

[9] A.A. Vlasov, V.M. Sizyakov, V.Yu. Bazhin, Use of sandy alumina for aluminum production. Proc. of Irkutsk State Techn. University. 21(6) (2017) 111-118.

DOI: 10.21285/1814-3520-2017-6-111-118

[10] I.I. Shepelev, N.V. Golovnykh, A.Yu. Sakhachev, A.M. Zhyzhaev, A.G. Kotlyagin, Improving limestone-nepheline charge sinter quality by gypsum anhydrate technogenic raw material introduction, Proc. of Irkutsk State Techn. University. 22(5) (2018) 225-239.

DOI: 10.21285/1814-3520-2018-5-225-239

[11] G.P. Tarcy, K. Torklep, Current efficiency in prebake and søderberg cells, Essential Readings in Light Metals. 2 (2013) 211-216.

DOI: 10.1002/9781118647851.ch30

[12] A.A. Tyutrin, N.V. Nemchinova, A.A. Volodkina, Effects of electrolysis parameters on the technical and economic performance indicators of OA-300M baths, Proc. of Irkutsk State Techn. University. 24(4) (2020) 906-918.

DOI: 10.21285/1814-3520-2020-4-906-918

[13] H. Alamdari, Aluminium production process: Challenges and opportunities, Metals. 7(4) (2017) 133.

[14] D. Brough, H. Jouhara, The aluminium industry: A review on state-of-the-art technologies, environmental impacts and possibilities for waste heat recovery, Intern. J. of Thermofluids. 1-2 (2020) 100007.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijft.2019.100007

[15] A.K. Pandey, R. Prakash, Opportunities for sustainability improvement in aluminum industry, Engineering Reports. 2(5) (2020) e12160.

[16] V. Buzunov, V. Mann, E. Chichuk, V. Frizorger, A. Pinaev, E. Nikitin, The first results of the industrial application of the EcoSoderberg technology at the Krasnoyarsk aluminium smelter, Light Metals. (2013) 573-576.

DOI: 10.1002/9781118663189.ch98

[17] G. Holywell, R. Breault, An overview of useful methods to treat, recover, or recycle spent potlining, JOM. 65(11) (2013) 1441-1451.

DOI: 10.1007/s11837-013-0769-y

[18] A.E. Burdonov, E.V. Zelinskaya, L.V. Gavrilenko, A.A. Gavrilenko, Investigation of substantial composition of alumina-bearing material of aluminium electrolysers for usage in primary aluminium technology, Tsvetnye Metally. 3 (2018) 32-38.

DOI: 10.17580/tsm.2018.03.05

[19] A.N. Baranov, E.V. Timkina, A.A. Tyutrin, Research on leaching fluorine from carbon-containing materials of aluminum production, Proc. of Irkutsk State Techn. University. 21(7) (2017) 143-151.

DOI: 10.21285/1814-3520-2017-7-143-151

[20] V. Kovács, L. Kiss, Comparative Analysis of the environmental impacts of aluminum smelting technologies, Light Metals. (2015) 529-534.

DOI: 10.1002/9781119093435.ch88

[21] X.L. Wang, Alumina Production Theory & Technology, Central South University, Changsha, (2010).

[22] R.H. Andrew, K.B. Suresh, C.G. Stephen, The surface chemistry of Bayer process solids: A review, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 146 (1999) 359-374.

DOI: 10.1016/s0927-7757(98)00798-5

[23] I.V. Loginova, A.A. Shoppert, Production of active aluminum hydroxide and its use for small-sized alumina production, Izvestiya. Non-Ferrous Metallurgy. 2 (2014) 34-38.

DOI: 10.17073/0021-3438-2014-2-34-38