The Effect of Laser Focus Shift on the Morphology of Melt Pool and Microstructure in Selective Laser Melting AlSi10Mg

Article Preview

Abstract:

Selective Laser Melting (SLM) enables to fabricate complex freeform geometries parts from computer models. In this paper, the effect of laser focus shift on the morphology, surface quality, grain size and texture of the SLMed AlSi10Mg was studied. Deep melt pool was found in 0 mm laser focus shift, while shallow and wide melt pool were found in-1.5 mm and +1.5 mm laser focus shift. The proportion of high angle grain boundaries in 0mm laser focus shift sample is the biggest han that in-1.5mm and +1.5mm. Height has a maximum value of 338 μm in +1.5 mm laser focus shift. The maximum Arithmetic average height is 33.5 μm in +1.5 mm laser focus shift. When the laser focus shift is 0 mm, the average grain diameter has a minimum grain diameter of 4.9 μm. {001}<100> cubic texture was found in sample fabricated by +1.5 mm laser focus shift rather than 0 mm and-1.5 mm laser focus shift.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1054)

Pages:

9-14

Citation:

Online since:

February 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Beyer C, Figueroa D. Design and Analysis of Lattice Structures for Additive Manufacturing[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2016, 138(12): 121014.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4033957

Google Scholar

[2] Xiong Z H, Liu S L, Li S F, et al. Role of melt pool boundary condition in determining the mechanical properties of selective laser melting AlSi10Mg alloy[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2019, 740-741: 148-156.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2018.10.083

Google Scholar

[3] Cunningham R Z, Cang; Parab, Niranjan. Keyhole threshold and morphology in laser melting revealed by ultrahigh-speed x-ray imaging[J]. Science, 2019, 363(6429): 849-852.

DOI: 10.1126/science.aav4687

Google Scholar

[4] Galy C, Le Guen E, Lacoste E, et al. Main defects observed in aluminum alloy parts produced by SLM: From causes to consequences[J]. Additive Manufacturing, 2018, 22: 165-175.

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.005

Google Scholar

[5] Kouraytem N, Chiang P-J, Jiang R, et al. Solidification crack propagation and morphology dependence on processing parameters in AA6061 from ultra-high-speed x-ray visualization[J]. Additive Manufacturing, 2021, 42: 101959.

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.101959

Google Scholar

[6] Wang J, Liu Z, Bai S, et al. Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of the electron-beam welded joints of cast Al–Cu–Mg–Ag alloy[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2021, 801: 140363.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2020.140363

Google Scholar

[7] Babu A P, Huang A, Birbilis N. On the heat treatment and mechanical properties of a high solute Al–Zn–Mg alloy processed through laser powder bed fusion process[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2021, 807: 140857.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.140857

Google Scholar

[8] Martin J H, Yahata B D, Hundley J M, et al. 3D printing of high-strength aluminium alloys[J]. Nature, 2017, 549(7672): 365-369.

DOI: 10.1038/nature23894

Google Scholar

[9] Andreau O, Koutiri I, Peyre P, et al. Texture control of 316L parts by modulation of the melt pool morphology in selective laser melting[J]. J Mater Process Technol, 2019, 264: 21-31.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.08.049

Google Scholar

[10] Scime L, Beuth J. Melt pool geometry and morphology variability for the Inconel 718 alloy in a laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process[J]. Additive Manufacturing, 2019, 29: 100830.

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.100830

Google Scholar

[11] Abolhasani, Seyedkashi, Kang, et al. Analysis of Melt-Pool Behaviors during Selective Laser Melting of AISI 304 Stainless-Steel Composites[J]. Metals, 2019, 9(8): 876.

DOI: 10.3390/met9080876

Google Scholar

[12] Wu Y-C, San C-H, Chang C-H, et al. Numerical modeling of melt-pool behavior in selective laser melting with random powder distribution and experimental validation[J]. J Mater Process Technol, 2018, 254: 72-78.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.11.032

Google Scholar

[13] Hooper P A. Melt pool temperature and cooling rates in laser powder bed fusion[J]. Additive Manufacturing, 2018, 22: 548-559.

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.032

Google Scholar

[14] Furumoto T, Egashira K, Munekage K, et al. Experimental investigation of melt pool behaviour during selective laser melting by high speed imaging[J]. CIRP Annals, 2018, 67(1): 253-256.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.097

Google Scholar

[15] Wang T, Wang Y, Chen C, Zhu H, Relationships between the characteristics of porosity, melt pool and process parameters in laser powder bed fusion Al-Zn alloy, Journal of Manufacturing Processes 68 (2021) 1236-1244.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.06.027

Google Scholar