Handling Composites at Aircraft Accident Sites: An Evaluation of the Fracture Features in Burnt CFRP after the Application of a Fixant Solution

Article Preview

Abstract:

Aircraft accident investigations are paramount for the continuous improvement of aviation safety. As such, maximizing the amount of evidence that can be gathered from an accident site is critical. However, with composites being increasingly used for the construction of airframes, additional challenges are introduced into the handling of debris. Specifically, composites under combustion are known to release potentially noxious fibers and gases, posing a threat to individuals in the surrounding area. In response thereto, so-called fixant solutions (also referred to as hold-down solutions) can be used to minimize the release of inhalable fibers. Nonetheless, researchers have highlighted the risk for these solutions to interfere with the accident investigation process by masking, altering or even destroying fractographic features needed to determine the source or sequence of composite failures. Consequently, literature calls for more research focused on characterizing the influence of fixant solutions on the failure analysis of aeronautical composites. In this study, the impact of one form of fixant solution – namely, wetted water (i.e., water with a surfactant) – is evaluated. A [(0/90)]8 woven carbon fiber/epoxy composite sample is damaged in tension (representing an aircraft accident-causing failure), burnt (simulating an accident site fire) and doused in a wetted water fixant solution. The fracture surface is subsequently evaluated via a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and the condition of fractographic features relevant to the failure analysis is qualitatively evaluated. Through the findings of the study, a better understanding of the impact of a fixant solution on the failure analysis conducted during an aircraft accident investigation can be obtained. Moreover, the results can be used to develop protocols related to the handling of burning composites aiming to maximize both, the safety of individuals involved as well as the evidence needed to conduct a thorough investigation into the causal factors of an accident.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1094)

Pages:

45-50

Citation:

Online since:

July 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] B. Chatterjee and S. Bhowmik, in: Sustainable Engineering Products and Manufacturing Technologies, edited by K. Kumar, D. Zindani and P. Davim, chapter, 9, Academic Press (2019).

Google Scholar

[2] K.V.N. Gopal, in: Advanced Composite Materials for Aerospace Engineering – Processing, Properties, and Applications, edited by S. Rana and R. Fangueiro, chapter, 14, Woodhead Publishing (2016).

Google Scholar

[3] C. Kassapoglou: Design and Analysis of Composite Structures: With Applications to Aerospace Structures (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., United Kingdom 2013).

Google Scholar

[4] A.P. Mouritz: Introduction to Aerospace Materials (Woodhead Publishing, United Kingdom 2012).

Google Scholar

[5] International Civil Aviation Organization [ICAO]: Manual of Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation – Part II, Procedures and Checklist (2012).

Google Scholar

[6] N. Zimmermann and P.H. Wang: Eng. Fail. Anal. Vol. 115 (2020), 104692

Google Scholar

[7] Australian Transport Safety Bureau [ATSB]: Fibre Composite Aircraft – Capability and Safety (2008).

Google Scholar

[8] A.P. Mouritz and A.G. Gibson: Fire Properties of Polymer Composite Materials (Springer, The Netherlands 2006).

Google Scholar

[9] I. Vajdová, E. Jenčová, S. Szabo Jr., L. Melníková, J. Galanda, M. Dobrowolska, and J. Ploch: Int. J. Enviorn. Res. Public Health Vol. 16 (2019), p.1.

Google Scholar

[10] Australian Transport Safety Bureau [ATSB] & Directorate of Defence Aviation and Air Force Safety [DDAAFS]: Hazards at Aviation Accident Sites – Guidance for Police and Emergency Personnel (2017).

Google Scholar

[11] J.E. Black, C.W. Edwards and T.W. Batten: Composite Material Hazard Assessment at Crash Sites (2015).

DOI: 10.21236/ada617988

Google Scholar

[12] J.M. Olson: Mishap Risk Control for Advanced Aerospace/Composite Materials (1994).

Google Scholar

[13] United States Army Combat Readiness Center [USACRC]: Mishap Risk Control Guidelines for Advanced Aerospace Materials: Environmental, Safety, and Health Concerns for Advanced Composites (1996).

Google Scholar

[14] M.R. Ferreri: Particulate Characterization and Control Evaluation for Carbon Fiber Composite Aircraft Crash Recovery Operations (2010).

Google Scholar

[15] N. Zimmermann, P.H. Wang, F.A.C. Mendonca and J.Keller: Exploring the Impact of Composite Material Fires and Associated Response Protocol on the Material Analysis during an Aircraft Accident Investigation (Presented at the 2021 International Society of Air Safety Investigators [ISASI] Annual Seminar).

Google Scholar

[16] J. Constantino, J. Jarbeau III., T. Hintz and M. Hinojosa: Assessment of Composite Hazards at Crash Sites: Industrial Hygiene Field Guidance for Bioenvironmental Engineers (2001).

Google Scholar

[17] C.R. Brooks and A. Choudhury: Failure Analysis of Engineering Materials (McGraw-Hill, United States of America 2002).

Google Scholar

[18] B.J. Inkson, in: Materials Characterization using Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) Methods, edited by G. Hübschen, I. Altpeter, R. Tschuncky and H.-G. Herrmann, chapter, 2, Woodhead Publishing (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100040-3.00009-2

Google Scholar

[19] ASTM International: ASTM D3039/D3039M – 17: Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials (2017).

Google Scholar

[20] E.S. Greenhalgh: Failure Analysis and Fractography of Polymer Composites (Woodhead Publishing, United Kingdom 2009).

Google Scholar

[21] B.A. Miller, R.J. Parrington, R.J. Shipley and D.P. Dennies, in: ASM Handbook, Volume 11: Failure Analysis and Prevention, edited by B.A. Miller, R.J. Parrington, R.J. Shipley and D.P. Dennies, chapter, 47, ASM International, United States of America (2021).

DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11.9781627082952

Google Scholar

[22] V. Srinivasa, V. Shivakumar, S. Nayaka, S. Jagadeeshaiaih, M. Seethram, R. Shenoy and A. Nafidi: Mater. Res. Vol. 13 (2010), p.417

DOI: 10.1590/s1516-14392010000300022

Google Scholar

[23] E.S. Greenhalgh and M.J. Hiley: Fractography of Polymer Composites: Current Status and Future Issues (Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Composite Materials, 2008).

Google Scholar

[24] P.L. Stumpff, in: ASM Handbook, Volume 21: Composites, edited by D.B. Miracle and S.L. Donaldson, chapter, 111, ASTM International, United States of America (2001).

Google Scholar

[25] M.S. Vinod, B.J. Sunil, V. Nayaka, R. Shenoy, M.S. Murali and A. Nafidi: J. Mech. Eng. Res. Vol. 2 (2010), p.1

Google Scholar