Weibull Technique for Evaluation of Swelling: Composite Graphite Resin Electrode for Electrochemical Treatment of Gold Mining Wastewaters

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper evaluated the swelling of graphite resin electrodes developed for utilization in the electrochemical treatment of gold mining wastewater. Graphite-resin electrodes were developed from used dry cells and resin using non-heat treatment processes (segregation). The Microstructure of the electrode was determined using a scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss Smart Evo 10) to ascertain the composition of the electrode. The swelling property of the electrodes was measured using the standard method through a combination of gold mining wastewater and chloride salt solutions. Effects of operational factors (particle size, percentage binder and compressive “compacting” pressure) on the swelling of the electrodes were monitored and evaluated statistically (using analysis of variance). Weibull probability distribution (2 and 3 parameters) was applied to the swelling through Microsoft Excel Solver and Moment Likelihood Method to ascertain the usefulness of the electrode in environmental pollution control through computation of reliability. The study revealed that the swelling was in the range of 1.48 % to 2.24 %, particle size (F5,20 =196.48, p = 2.76 x 10-16), percentage binder (F4,12 =181.58, p = 1.27 x 10-10), and compressive pressure (F3,12 = 106.69, p = 6.43 x 10-9) were significant factors that influence swelling of graphite-resin electrode at 95 % confidence level. the values of α and β for 2-parameters Weibull distribution are 63.162 and 15.098, and 1.265 and 10.089 for MSE and MLM methods, respectively. The Table shows that the values of α, β and θ for 3-parameters Weibull distribution are 3.679, 8.097 and 0.168, and 4.350, 7.165 and 0.198 for MSE and MLM methods, respectively. It was concluded that particle size and compacting pressure are significant factors that had an effect on the swelling of graphite resin electrodes for treatment water and wastewater.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1115)

Pages:

31-40

Citation:

Online since:

February 2024

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2024 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Asare M. O, Száková J and Tlustoš, P (2023), Mechanisms of As, Cd, Pb, and Zn hyperaccumulation by plants and their effects on soil microbiome in the rhizosphere. Front. Environ. Sci. 11:1157415

DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1157415

Google Scholar

[2] Moses, S; Agbaji, E.B; Ajibola, V.O; and Gimba, C. E (2018).Heavy Metals Content in Water and Crops in Golding Mining Vicinity on Major Dams in Zamfara State, Nigeria. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage. 22 (6) 973 –979

DOI: 10.4314/jasem.v22i6.22

Google Scholar

[3] Bernard, E. and Ayandeji, O.M (2020). Impact of industrial effluents, domestic wastewater and natural dams on heavy metals concentrations in vegetables cultivated in Northern Nigeria. 12(1), 1-7

DOI: 10.5897/JECE2019.0451

Google Scholar

[4] Ahmadzadeh, S and Dolatabadi, M. (2018) Modeling and kinetics study of electrochemical peroxidation process for mineralization of bisphenol A; a new paradigm for groundwater treatment. Journal of Molecular Liquids 254, 76–82

DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.01.080

Google Scholar

[5] Al-Raad, A., Hanafiah, M. M., Naje, A. S., Ajee, M. A., O. Basheer, A., Ali Aljayashi, T., and Ekhwan Toriman, M. (2019). Treatment of Saline Water Using Electrocoagulation with Combined Electrical Connection of Electrodes. Processes, 7(5), 242

DOI: 10.3390/pr7050242

Google Scholar

[6] Andreozzi, M., Álvarez, M. G., Contreras, S., Medina, F., Clarizia, L., Vitiello, G., and Marotta, R. (2018). Treatment of saline produced water through photocatalysis using rGO-TiO 2 nanocomposites. Catalysis Today, 315, 194–204.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2018.04.048

Google Scholar

[7] Dehghani, M. H. Dehghan, A. Alidadi, H. Dolatabadi, M. Mehrabpour, M and Converti A. Removal of methylene blue dye from aqueous solutions by a new chitosan/zeolite composite from shrimp waste: kinetic and equilibrium study, Korean J. Chem. Eng. (2017).1–9.

DOI: 10.1007/s11814-017-0077-2

Google Scholar

[8] Gilhotra, V., Das, L., Sharma, A., Kang, T.S., Singh, P., Dhuria, R.S., and Bhatti, M.S., Electrocoagulation technology for high strength arsenic wastewater: process optimization and mechanistic study. J. Cleaner Prod. 198, (2018), 693–703.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.023

Google Scholar

[9] Hashim, K.S., Al Khaddar, R., Jasim, N., Shaw, A., Phipps, D., Kot, P., Pedrola, M.O., Alattabi, A.W., Abdulredha, M., and Alawsh, R., Electrocoagulation as a green technology for phosphate removal from River water. Sep. Purif. Technol. 210, (2019), 135–144.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.07.056

Google Scholar

[10] Hashim, K.S., AlKhaddar, R., Shaw, A., Kot, P., Al-Jumeily, D., Alwash, R., and Aljefery, M. H., Electrocoagulation as an eco-friendly River water treatment method. In: Advances in Water Resources Engineering and Management. Springer, (2020). 219–235.

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-8181-2_17

Google Scholar

[11] Islam, S.D.-U., Electrocoagulation (EC) technology for wastewater treatment and pollutants removal. Sustain. Water Resources. Management. 5, (2019), 359–380.

DOI: 10.1007/s40899-017-0152-1

Google Scholar

[12] Kamaraj, R. Pandiarajan, A. Gandhi, M.R. Shibayama, A. and Vasudevan, S. (2017) Eco friendly and easily prepared graphene nanosheets for safe drinking water: removal of chlorophenoxyacetic acid herbicides, Chem. Sel. 2, 342–355.

DOI: 10.1002/slct.201601645

Google Scholar

[13] Khan, M. and Lo, I.M. (2017). Removal of ionizable aromatic pollutants from contaminated water using nano γ-Fe2 O3 based magnetic cationic hydrogel: sorptive performance, magnetic separation and reusability, J. Hazard. Mater. 322,195–204

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.01.051

Google Scholar

[14] McBeath, S.T., Mohseni, M., and Wilkinson, D.P., (2018). Pilot-scale iron electrocoagulation treatment for natural organic matter removal. Environ. Technol. 1–9.

DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2018.1505965

Google Scholar

[15] Oke, I. A; Adie D.B; Ismail A.; Lukman, S; Igboro S.B and Sanni, M.I. (2014) Computer Simulation In The Development And Optimization Of Carbon Resin Electrodes For Water And Wastewater Treatment Electrochemically. Ife Journal of Science. 16,(2), 227- 239

Google Scholar

[16] Oke, I. A, 0bijole, O. A; Adekunbi, E. A, Babajide, J. O; ldi, M-D. and Aladesanmi, O. T. (2021). Thermal Property of Carbon Resin Electrodes Developed for Electrochemical Treatment of Water and Wastewaters. FUTAJEET, 15(1), (2021). 84-91. https://doi.org/10.514591futajeet.2021.15.1.157

DOI: 10.51459/futajeet.2021.15.1.157

Google Scholar

[17] Lee, D., Kondo, A., Lee, S., Myeong, S., Sun, S., Hwang, I., and Paik, U. (2020). Controlled swelling behavior and stable cycling of silicon/graphite granular composite for high energy density in lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Power Sources, 457, 228021

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228021

Google Scholar

[18] Li, Y., Wei, C., Sheng, Y., Jiao, F., and Wu, K. (2020). Swelling Force in Lithium-Ion Power Batteries. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c01035

Google Scholar

[19] Lu, D., Lin, S., Cui, W., Hu, S., Zhang, Z., and Peng, W. (2020). Swelling mechanism of 0%SOC lithium iron phosphate battery at high temperature storage. Journal of Energy Storage, 32, 101791

DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2020.101791

Google Scholar

[20] Park, K., Myeong, S., Shin, D., Cho, C.-W., Kim, S. C., and Song, T. (2018). Improved swelling behavior of Li ion batteries by microstructural engineering of anode. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry

DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2018.11.035

Google Scholar

[21] Oke, I.A (2009) Influence Of Carbonization On Selected Engineering Properties Of Carbon Resin Electrodes For Electrochemical Treatment Of Wastewater. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 87 (10), 801 – 811

DOI: 10.1002/cjce.20218

Google Scholar

[22] APHA, (2015) Standard Method for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 23rd edn, America Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation, Washington DC.

Google Scholar

[23] Mark, van Loosdrecht, M.C.M., Nielsen, P.H. Lopez- Vazquez, C.M., Brdjanovic, D.,(2016) Experimental Methods in Wastewater Treatment. 1st Edition, International Water Publishing Alliance House, London.

DOI: 10.2166/9781780404752

Google Scholar

[24] Pobočíková, I.; Sedliačková, Z. and Michalková, M (2017). Application of four probability distributions for wind speed modelling. TRANSCOM 2017: International scientific conference on sustainable, modern and safe transport. Procedia Engineering 192 (2017) 713 – 718

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.123

Google Scholar

[25] Jones, L. D.; Vandeperrea, L.J. Haynes, T.A. and Wenman, M. R. (2020). Theory and application of Weibull distributions to 1D peridynamics for brittle solids. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 363, 112903

DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.112903

Google Scholar

[26] Faruk Oral, Ismail Ekmekçi and Nevzat Onat Weibull distribution for determination of wind analysis and energy production. World Journal of Engineering 12(3) (2015) 215-220

DOI: 10.1260/1708-5284.12.3.215

Google Scholar

[27] Ferhat Bingo¨ Comparison of Weibull Estimation Methods for Diverse Winds. Volume 2020, Article ID 3638423, 11 pages

DOI: 10.1155/2020/3638423

Google Scholar

[28] Fan Yang, Hu Ren, and Zhili Hu. Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Three-Parameter Weibull Distribution Using Evolutionary Strategy. Volume 2019, Article ID 6281781, 8 pages

DOI: 10.1155/2019/6281781

Google Scholar

[29] Kumar, M., Singh, S. K., Singh, U., and Pathak, A. (2019). Empirical Bayes estimator of parameter, reliability and hazard rate for Kumaraswamy distribution. Life Cycle Reliability and Safety Engineering

DOI: 10.1007/s41872-019-00085-0

Google Scholar

[30] Arora, S., Mahajan, K. K., and Kumari, R. (2019). Bayes estimators for the reliability and hazard rate functions of Topp-Leone distribution using Type-II censored data. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 1–18

DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2019.1602646

Google Scholar