Literature Review of the Behaviour of Adhesive Joint Fatigue Performance

Abstract:

Adhesive joints are essential in modern engineering, offering lightweight, durable and efficient solutions for bonding in industries such as aerospace, automotive, and renewable energy. However, their fatigue performance under cyclic loading remains a critical challenge, shaped by a complex interplay of geometrical, material, environmental, and loading factors. This review explores the mechanisms of fatigue failure, highlighting the importance of joint design, material optimization, and surface preparation in mitigating stress concentrations and enhancing durability. Advances in toughened adhesives, surface treatments, and environmental protection methods are highlighted, along with predictive models ranging from empirical S-N curves to advanced finite element simulations and probabilistic approaches. Despite significant progress, challenges remain in integrating these techniques for real-world applications, particularly under variable loading and harsh environmental conditions. Future research must focus on hybrid methodologies, adaptive materials, and standardized protocols to bridge the gap between laboratory insights and practical implementations. This comprehensive review provides a foundation for improving the fatigue performance of adhesive joints, ensuring their reliability and effectiveness in critical engineering systems.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 1153)
• Pages: 23-32
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-F2MUdc
• Online since: June 2025
• Authors: Péter Péczi-Kovács*, Zoltan Weltsch, Miklós Berczeli
• Keywords: Adhesive, Fatigue, Resistance

References

[1] F. Cheng, Y. Hu, X. Zhang, X. Hu, and Z. Huang, "Adhesive bond strength enhancing between carbon fiber reinforced polymer and aluminum substrates with different surface morphologies created by three sulfuric acid solutions," Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., vol. 146, p.106427, 2021.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106427

[2] F. C. Sousa et al., "Investigation of geometric and material effects on the fatigue performance of composite and steel adhesive joints," Compos. Struct., vol. 344, no. June, p.118313, 2024.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118313

[3] C. Bagni, A. Halfpenny, M. Hill, and A. Tarasek, "A practical methodology for the fatigue life estimation of adhesive joints," Procedia Struct. Integr., vol. 57, no. 2022, p.598–610, 2023.

DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2024.03.066

[4] F. Mannino, D. V. Srinivasan, D. Fanteria, and A. P. Vassilopoulos, "Standard specimen geometries do not always lead to consistent fatigue results for epoxy adhesives," Int. J. Fatigue, vol. 190, no. June 2024, p.108600, 2025.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108600

[5] P. Vigón, A. Argüelles, M. Lozano, and J. Viña, "Fatigue behavior of adhesive joints under modes I and II fracture in carbon-epoxy composites, influence of exposure time in a saline environment," J. Adv. Join. Process., vol. 9, no. April, 2024.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jajp.2024.100225

[6] L. Duan et al., "Investigation on shear and fatigue performance of CFRP/aluminum alloy single-lap adhesive joint," Thin-Walled Struct., vol. 196, no. April 2023, p.111421, 2024.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2023.111421

[7] C. W. Chu, C. H. Cheng, K. Obayashi, R. A. H. Bayomi, A. Takahara, and K. Kojio, "Effects of curing conditions on adhesive and fatigue properties of hydrogenated epoxy resins in bulk state and single-lap-joint configuration," Int. J. Adhes. Adhes., vol. 132, no. March 2023, p.103690, 2024.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103690

[8] F. C. Sousa, P. Zamani, A. Akhavan-Safar, and L. F. M. da Silva, "A comprehensive review of the S-N fatigue behaviour of adhesive joints," J. Adv. Join. Process., vol. 9, no. December 2023, p.100178, 2024.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jajp.2023.100178

[9] X. Zhang, Y. Ju, A. Zhu, and T. Zou, "Fatigue behavior of single-lap adhesive joints with similar and dissimilar adherends under cyclic loading: A combined experimental and simulation study," Mater. Today Commun., vol. 37, no. 2898, p.107215, 2023.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107215

[10] V. Kumar, S. Sharma, and A. Singh, "Impact of joint variables on shear and fatigue behavior of composite-metal single-lap adhesive joint," Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 168, no. November 2024, 2025.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.109079

[11] F. Castro Sousa, A. Akhavan-Safar, R. J. C. Carbas, E. A. S. Marques, A. Q. Barbosa, and L. F. M. da Silva, "Experimental study on the influence of environmental conditions on the fatigue behaviour of adhesive joints," Int. J. Fatigue, vol. 175, no. February, p.107752, 2023.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107752

[12] J. Zhang, H. Y. Li, H. Jia, and H. Li, "Experimental investigation on multiaxial ratchetting behaviour and fatigue life of silicone seal adhesive bonding butt-joints," Int. J. Adhes. Adhes., vol. 103, no. August, p.102700, 2020.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102700

[13] S. Safaei, L. M. Martulli, A. Bernasconi, and M. Carboni, "Modelling the static and fatigue behavior of hybrid spot welded-adhesively bonded single lap joints," Int. J. Adhes. Adhes., vol. 130, no. September 2023, p.103619, 2024.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103619

[14] A. I. M. Foletti, J. Sena Cruz, and A. P. Vassilopoulos, "Fabrication and curing conditions effects on the fatigue behavior of a structural adhesive," Int. J. Fatigue, vol. 139, no. March, p.105743, 2020.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105743

[15] H. J. Gudladt and S. Frömmel, "Fatigue and fracture behavior of adhesive-bonded structures in the light of the surface morphology," Int. J. Adhes. Adhes., vol. 88, no. October 2018, p.74–80, 2019.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.10.016

[16] V. C. Beber and M. Brede, "Multiaxial static and fatigue behaviour of elastic and structural adhesives for railway applications," Procedia Struct. Integr., vol. 28, p.1950–1962, 2020.

DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2020.11.018

[17] G. Riedl, F. Baldi, and G. M. Wallner, "A slope-based J-integral approach and advanced image processing for assessment of the cyclic fatigue delamination behavior of adhesive joints," Int. J. Fatigue, vol. 192, no. November 2024, p.108730, 2025.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108730

[18] B. Schneider, V. C. Beber, J. Schweer, M. Brede, and B. Mayer, "An experimental investigation of the fatigue damage behaviour of adhesively bonded joints under the combined effect of variable amplitude stress and temperature variation," Int. J. Adhes. Adhes., vol. 83, p.41–49, 2018.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.02.011

[19] Y. Doroudi, D. Fernando, A. Hosseini, and E. Ghafoori, "Behavior of cracked steel plates strengthened with adhesively bonded CFRP laminates under fatigue Loading: Experimental and analytical study," Compos. Struct., vol. 266, no. September 2020, p.113816, 2021.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113816

[20] Z. Jiang, S. Wan, Z. Fang, and A. Song, "Experimental investigation of fatigue behavior for adhesively-bonded GFRP/steel joints," Eng. Struct., vol. 213, no. March, p.110580, 2020.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110580