Mechanical and Environmental Performance of Concrete with Partial Replacement of Cement by Silica Fume and Scallop Shell Powder in Coastal Areas

Article Preview

Abstract:

CO2 emissions from cement production have significantly increased, leading to the search for alternative materials that optimize the process and reduce environmental impact. In this context, the present study investigates the use of microsilica (MS) and fan shell powder (PCA) as cement replacements. Material characterization tests were conducted, and six mix designs were made, including 5% PCA and 10% MS replacements individually, as well as combinations of 10% MS with 5%, 7.5%, and 10% PCA. Additionally, compression strength properties were analyzed at 3, 7, and 28 days, and flexural strength at 7 and 28 days. The findings regarding mechanical strength were favorable, except for the mix with 10% MS and 10% PCA, which indicates the maximum substitution percentage. Furthermore, a CO2 emission analysis was conducted according to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, achieving a reduction of up to 11.16% compared to the control concrete. In conclusion, the study demonstrates that the combination of 10% MS and 5% PCA is the optimal replacement, improving compressive strength by 6.99% and flexural strength by 1.33%, while reducing CO2 emissions by 10.44%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1180)

Pages:

87-99

Citation:

Online since:

March 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Hasanbeigi, "Global cement industry's GHG emissions. Global Efficiency Intel", p.42–48, 2021,https://www.globalefficiencyintel.com/new-blog/2021/global-cement-industry-ghg-emissions

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16842/fig-1

Google Scholar

[2] ASOCEM, "Reporte estadístico mensual 2023", 2023, https://www.asocem.org.pe/estadisticas-nacionales/reporte-estadistico-mensual-diciembre-(2023)

Google Scholar

[3] Y. El Mendili and M.-H. Benzaama, "Investigation of Mechanical and Thermal Performance of Concrete with Scallop Shells as Partial Cement Replacement: Alternative Binder and Life Cycle Assessment" CivilEng, vol. 3, p.760–778, 2022

DOI: 10.3390/civileng3030044

Google Scholar

[4] B. Yang, Y. Han, Z. Kong and Xiao-Yong Wang, "Effect of waste oyster shell powder on the micro- and macroproperties and sustainable performance of cement-based materials", Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 92, pp.109800-2024

DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109800

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Han, Runsheng Lin, Xiao-Yong Wang, "Performance of sustainable concrete made from waste oyster shell powder and blast furnace slag", Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 47, p.103918, 2022

DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103918

Google Scholar

[6] P. Sangeetha, M. Shanmugapriya, K. Santhosh Saravanan, P. Prabhakaran and V. Shashankar, "Mechanical properties of concrete with seashell waste as partial replacement of cement and aggregate", Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 61, pp.320-326, 2022

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.501

Google Scholar

[7] H. M. Hamada, Farid Abed, Herda Yati Binti Katman, Ali M. Humada, Mohammed S. Al Jawahery, A. Majdi, Salim T. Yousif and Blessen Skariah Thomas, "Effect of silica fume on the properties of sustainable cement concrete", Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 24, pp.8887-8908, 2023

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.147

Google Scholar

[8] A. Szcześniak, J. Siwiński, A. Stolarski, A. Piekarczuk and Nasiłowska, B., "The Influence of the Addition of Microsilica and Fly Ash on the Properties of Ultra-High-Performance Concretes", Materials, vol. 18, 2025

DOI: 10.3390/ma18010028

Google Scholar

[9] UNACEM, "Anexo ASG edición 2023", 2023, https://unacem.pe/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/ Anexo-ASG-2023.pdf

Google Scholar

[10] A. Lopez, E. Kohlman and M. Shakouri, "Seashell Powder as a Sustainable Alternative in Cement-Based Materials: A Systematic Literature Review", Sustainability, vol. 17, p.592, 20225

DOI: 10.3390/su17020592

Google Scholar