Evaluating the Reliability of Theoretical Predictions for Tensile Strength in Natural Fiber-Reinforced Composites

Article Preview

Abstract:

Natural fibers are increasingly recognized as sustainable alternatives to synthetic reinforcements in polymer composites due to their biodegradability, high availability, and low production cost. However, their mechanical performance is often inconsistent, making it crucial to evaluate predictive models that estimate tensile strength. This study investigates the reliability of theoretical predictions based on the Rule of Mixtures (ROM) in unidirectional composites reinforced with various natural fibers, including bamboo, coconut, pineapple, banana midrib, and sugar palm fibers. Fibers were subjected to alkali treatment prior to composite fabrication with a polyester matrix, and tensile tests were performed following ASTM D-638 standards. Theoretical predictions of optimum tensile strength were determined at minimum, Vmin and critical, Vcrit fiber volume fractions. The tensile strength based on theoretical prediction are then compared to the experimental results. The results show that bamboo fiber achieve optimum tensile strength of 51.92 MPa with relatively low fiber volume fractions. In contrast, the banana fiber achieves the lowest tensile strength of 39.10 MPa. Overall, the theoretical approach exhibited good agreement with experimental trends, particularly in predicting optimum fiber fractions, validating its utility as a preliminary design tool for natural fiber-reinforced composites.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1196)

Pages:

127-136

Citation:

Online since:

June 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Alsubari S., Zuhri M., Sapuan S., Ishak M., Ilyas R., & Asyraf M. Potential of Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites in Sandwich Structures: A Review on Its Mechanical Properties. Polymers 2021;13(3):423.

DOI: 10.3390/polym13030423

Google Scholar

[2] Aisyah H., Tahir P., Sapuan S., Ilyas R., Abdan K., Norizan M.et al.. A Comprehensive Review on Advanced Sustainable Woven Natural Fibre Polymer Composites. Polymers 2021;13(3):471

DOI: 10.3390/polym13030471

Google Scholar

[3] Norizan M., Asyraf M., Rayung M., Norrrahim M., Shazleen S., Rani M.et al.. Thermogravimetric Analysis Properties of Cellulosic Natural Fiber Polymer Composites: A Review on Influence of Chemical Treatments. Polymers 2021;13(16):2710

DOI: 10.3390/polym13162710

Google Scholar

[4] Rajak D., Pagar D., Menezes P., & Linul E.. Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites: Manufacturing, Properties, and Applications. Polymers 2019;11(10):1667

DOI: 10.3390/polym11101667

Google Scholar

[5] Gowthaman S., Nakashima K., & Kawasaki S.. A State-of-the-Art Review on Soil Reinforcement Technology Using Natural Plant Fiber Materials: Past Findings, Present Trends and Future Directions. Materials 2018;11(4):553

DOI: 10.3390/ma11040553

Google Scholar

[6] Kumar S., Prasad L., Patel V., Kumar V., Kumar A., Yadav A.et al.. Physical and Mechanical Properties of Natural Leaf Fiber-Reinforced Epoxy Polyester Composites. Polymers 2021;13(9):1369

DOI: 10.3390/polym13091369

Google Scholar

[7] Emamverdian A., Ding Y., Ranaei F., & Ahmad Z.. Application of Bamboo Plants in Nine Aspects. The Scientific World Journal 2020;2020:1-9

DOI: 10.1155/2020/7284203

Google Scholar

[8] Fan D., Staufer U., & Accardo A. Engineered 3D Polymer and Hydrogel Microenvironments for Cell Culture Applications. Bioengineering 2019; 6 (4): 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/ bioengineering6040113

DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering6040113

Google Scholar

[9] Pappu A., Patil V., Jain S., Mahindrakar A., Haque R., & Thakur V.. Advances in industrial prospective of cellulosic macromolecules enriched banana biofibre resources: A review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2015;79:449-458

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.05.013

Google Scholar

[10] Niutta C., Tridello A., Paolino D., & Belingardi G.. Residual Properties in Damaged Laminated Composites through Nondestructive Testing: A Review. Materials 2021;14(16):4513

DOI: 10.3390/ma14164513

Google Scholar

[11] Jusoh S., Rapi H., Ilyas R., Petrů M., & Sapuan S.. Delamination and Manufacturing Defects in Natural Fiber-Reinforced Hybrid Composite: A Review. Polymers 2021;13(8):1323

DOI: 10.3390/polym13081323

Google Scholar

[12] Azevedo A., Cruz A., Marvila M., Oliveira L., Monteiro S., Vieira C.et al.. Natural Fibers as an Alternative to Synthetic Fibers in Reinforcement of Geopolymer Matrices: A Comparative Review. Polymers 2021;13(15):2493

DOI: 10.3390/polym13152493

Google Scholar

[13] Mndlovu H., Toit L., Kumar P., Choonara Y., Marimuthu T., Kondiah P.et al.. Bioplatform Fabrication Approaches Affecting Chitosan-Based Interpolymer Complex Properties and Performance as Wound Dressings. Molecules 2020; 25(1): 222

DOI: 10.3390/molecules25010222

Google Scholar

[14] Norizan M., Asyraf M., Rayung M., Norrrahim M., Shazleen S., Rani M.et al.. Thermogravimetric Analysis Properties of Cellulosic Natural Fiber Polymer Composites: A Review on Influence of Chemical Treatments. Polymers 2021;13(16):2710

DOI: 10.3390/polym13162710

Google Scholar

[15] Trache D., Hussin M., Kassim M., & Thakur V. Recent progress in cellulose nanocrystals: sources and production. Nanoscale 2017; 9 (5): 1763-1786

DOI: 10.1039/c6nr09494e

Google Scholar

[16] Masoud F., Sapuan S., Ariffin M., Nukman Y., & Bayraktar E.. Cutting Processes of Natural Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites. Polymers 2020; 12(6): 1332

DOI: 10.3390/polym12061332

Google Scholar

[17] Norizan M., Asyraf M., Rayung M., Norrrahim M., Shazleen S., Rani M.et al.. Thermogravimetric Analysis Properties of Cellulosic Natural Fiber Polymer Composites: A Review on Influence of Chemical Treatments. Polymers 2021; 13(16): 2710

DOI: 10.3390/polym13162710

Google Scholar

[18] Ma L., Liu F., Liu D., & Liu Y.. Review of Strain Rate Effects of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites. Polymers 2021;13(17):2839

DOI: 10.3390/polym13172839

Google Scholar

[19] Norizan M., Asyraf M., Athiyah S., Shazleen S., Rafiqah S., Harussani M.et al.. A Review on Mechanical Performance of Hybrid Natural Fiber Polymer Composites for Structural Applications. Polymers 2021; 13(13): 2170

DOI: 10.3390/polym13132170

Google Scholar

[20] Rawi N., Jayaraman K., Bhattacharyya D., Kassim M., Saurabh C., Hussin M.et al.. Green Composites Made of Bamboo Fabric and Poly (Lactic) Acid for Packaging Applications—A Review. Materials 2016;9(6):435

DOI: 10.3390/ma9060435

Google Scholar

[21] Norizan M., Asyraf M., Abdan K., Abdullah N., Aisyah H., Rafiqah S.et al.. A Review on Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite for Bullet Proof and Ballistic Applications. Polymers 2021;13(4):646

DOI: 10.3390/polym13040646

Google Scholar

[22] Cervino G., Cicciù M., Herford A., Germanà A., & Fiorillo L.. Biological and Chemo-Physical Features of Denture Resins. Materials 2020;13(15):3350

DOI: 10.3390/ma13153350

Google Scholar

[23] Wang Y. and Huang Z.. Analytical Micromechanics Models for Elastoplastic Behavior of Long Fibrous Composites: A Critical Review and Comparative Study. Materials 2018;11(10):1919

DOI: 10.3390/ma11101919

Google Scholar

[24] Bahrami M., Abenójar J., & Martı́nez M.. Recent Progress in Hybrid Biocomposites: Mechanical Properties, Water Absorption, and Flame Retardancy. Materials 2020;13(22):5145

DOI: 10.3390/ma13225145

Google Scholar

[25] Lee C., Abdan K., & Lee S. Importance of Interfacial Adhesion Condition on Characterization of Plant-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites: A Review. Polymers 2021;13(3):438

DOI: 10.3390/polym13030438

Google Scholar

[26] Bazli, M. and Abolfazli, M. (2020). Mechanical Properties of Fibre Reinforced Polymers under Elevated Temperatures: An Overview. Polymers, 12 (11), 2600

DOI: 10.3390/polym12112600

Google Scholar

[27] Santulli C. Mechanical and Impact Damage Analysis on Carbon/Natural Fibers Hybrid Composites: A Review. Materials 2019; 12(3): 517.

DOI: 10.3390/ma12030517

Google Scholar