Solute Drag and Entropy Production - Two Approaches to the Same Phenomenon

Mats Hillert

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.467-470.3

Paper Titles

Solute Drag and Entropy Production - Two Approaches to the Same Phenomenon
p.3

Texture and Microstructure of the Austenite in Multiphased Steel Sheets
p.11

Characteristics of the Deformed and Recrystallised Grains Obtained after Hot Plane Strain Compression of a Model Fe-30wt%Ni Alloy
p.21

Study of Deformation Microstructure and Static Recovery in Copper after Cold Drawing
p.27

Potentiality of Mean-Field Approaches for Recrystallisation: Characterization of the Deformed State of Polycrystals
p.33

Evaluation of Stored Energy in Cold-Rolled IF Steels from EBSD Data and Its Application to Recrystallization Modeling
p.39

An Impingement – Spheroidisation Theory for Nucleation and Grain Growth
p.45

Estimation of Stored Energy Distribution from EBSD Measurements
p.51

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vols. 467-470Solute Drag and Entropy Production - Two...

Solute Drag and Entropy Production - Two Approaches to the Same Phenomenon

Abstract:

The historical development of the two approaches to the interaction between solute atoms and a migrating interface, based on dissipation of Gibbs energy and on solute drag, are reviewed and compared. In the way the solute drag was formulated long ago for recrystallization and grain growth, it does not apply to phase transformations. With a new solute drag equation, which was recently proposed, it turns out that the two approaches are completely equivalent for phase transformations as well as grain boundary migration.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 467-470)

Pages:

3-10

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.467-470.3

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2004

Authors:

Mats Hillert

Keywords:

Diffusion, Driving Force, Phase Transformation, Recrystallization, Solute Drag

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] D. Turnbull: Trans. AIME. Vol. 191 (1951), pp.661-6 Title of Publication (to be inserted by the publisher).

Google Scholar

[2] M. Hillert: Internal Report, The Growth of Ferrite, Bainite and Martensite. Swedish Institute for Metal Research, Stockholm, (1960).

Google Scholar

[3] J. C. Baker and J. W. Cahn: in Solidification, eds. T J Hughel and G F Bolling,. ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1971, p.23.

Google Scholar

[4] M. Hillert: Acta Mater. Vol. 47 (1999), p.4481.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Hillert: The Role of Interfaces in Phase Transformations in The Mechanism of Phase Transformations in Crystalline Solids,. Inst. Metals Monograph No. 33 (London 1969), p.231.

Google Scholar

[6] J. W. Cahn: Acta metall. Vol. 10 (1962), p.1.

Google Scholar

[7] M. Hillert and B. Sundman: Acta metall. Vol. 24 (1976), p.731.

Google Scholar

[8] K. Lücke and K. Detert: Acta metal. Vol. 5 (1957), p.628.

Google Scholar

[9] K. Lücke and H. Stüwe: in Recovery and Recrystallization of Metals, ed. L Himmel. Interscience, New York, 1963, p.11.

Google Scholar

[10] G. R. Purdy and Y. J. M. Brechet: Acta metall. mater. Vol. 43 (1995), p.3763.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Hillert , J. Odqvist and J. Ågren: Scripta mater. Vol. 45 (2001), p.221.

Google Scholar

[12] M. Hillert: unpublished work.

Google Scholar