Clays from Southern Brazil: Physical, Chemical and Mineralogical Characterization

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fore knowledge of the characteristics of ceramic raw materials is of utmost importance during the development, processing and production stages of any ceramic product. This work describes the characterization of clays commonly used in the ceramics industry. Two different clays were selected: clay A, from Tubarão-SC and clay B, from Porto Alegre-RS. Their chemical composition was obtained by X-ray fluorescence and their mineralogy by X-ray diffraction, coupled with numerical rational analysis. Their thermal behaviour was studied by differential thermal analysis and thermogravimetry. Their particle size distribution and plasticity were also determined. Clay A showed circa 47.5 % quartz (by weight), 40.2 % kaolinite and 9.9 % muscovite mica. Clay B showed a high kaolinite content (circa 72 wt.%), accompanied by montmorillonite (circa 10 %) and potash feldspar (circa 10 % microcline). Clay B was found to be much more plastic than clay A, and both are suitable for pottery, tiles and brick making.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 498-499)

Pages:

447-452

Citation:

Online since:

November 2005

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2005 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] V. Beltran, E. Sanchez, J. Garcia and F. Ferrando. Tile Brick Int. 12 (1996) 320-326.

Google Scholar

[2] P.J. Sanchez Soto, J.L. Diaz-Hernández, M. Raigón-Pichardo, A. Ruíz Conde and G. GarciaRamos. Brit. Ceram. Trans. 93 (1994) 196-201.

Google Scholar

[3] B. Baran, Ertürk, Y. Sarikaya and T. Alemdaroglu. Appl. Clay Sci., 20 (2001) 53-63.

Google Scholar

[4] G. W. Brindley and G. Brown, G. Mineralogical Society, London, 1984, 495 p.

Google Scholar

[5] J. Konta. Appl. Clay Sci., 10 (1995) 275-335.

Google Scholar

[6] D. M. Moore and R. C. Reynolds. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997, 378 p.

Google Scholar

[7] M. H. Fentau and T. Mengistu. Appl. Clay Sci., 13 (1998) 149-164.

Google Scholar

[8] W. M. Carty and U. Senapati. J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 81 (1998) 3-20.

Google Scholar

[9] C. Coelho, N. Roqueiro and D. Hotza. Mater. Letters, 52 (2002) 394-398.

Google Scholar

[10] A. Casagrande. Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 113 (1948), 901.

Google Scholar

[11] T.S. Kabre, K. Traore and P. Blanchart. Appl. Clay Sci., 12 (1998) 463-477.

Google Scholar

[12] M. Hajjaji, S. Kacim and M. Boulmane. Appl. Clay Sci., 21 (2002) 203-212.

Google Scholar

[13] W. A. Saqqa, I. M. Dwairi and H. M. Akhal. Appl. Clay Sci., 9 (1995) 443-458.

Google Scholar

[14] M. Hajjaji, S. Kacim, A. Alami, A. Bouadalli and M. Mountassir. Appl. Clay Sci., 20 (2001) 1-12.

Google Scholar

[15] A. Bentayeb, M. Amouric, J. Olives, A. Dekayir and A. Nadiri. Appl. Clay Sci., 22 (2003) 211-221.

DOI: 10.1016/s0169-1317(03)00066-8

Google Scholar

[16] R. C. Mackenzie, Differencial Thermal Analysis. Academic Press, London, (1972).

Google Scholar

[17] G. Ekosse. Appl. Clay Sci., 20 (2001) 137-152.

Google Scholar