Influence of Cu on the Mechanical Properties of an Al-4.4wt%Mg Alloy after ECAP

Article Preview

Abstract:

Two Aluminium alloys, type AA5182 and AA5182+1.2wt% Cu, have been studied. The second alloy in solution treated condition is 18% stronger than the first one. During ageing at 150°C or 200°C it shows a characteristic fast increase in yield strength during the first minutes of ageing, followed by a 'plateau'. Both materials have been deformed in an ECAP die (4 and 8 passes) at 200°C and the microstructure, hardness and mechanical properties in compression at room temperature have been investigated. Although in none of the two materials a true sub-micron grain size was obtained at 200°C, a fair combination of strength and strain hardening was observed. The AA5182+Cu alloy, when ECAP’ed after a solution treatment and quenching, shows an increase in strength of about 20% compared to the AA5182 reference alloy. A post-ECAP annealing at 200°C does not lead to a further increase in hardness or strength. An analysis of the substructure and the mechanical properties during ECAP led to the conclusion that the precipitates formed during ECAP at 200°C do not directly contribute to the higher strength of alloy AA5182+Cu, but they contribute indirectly by slowing down the recovery.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 503-504)

Pages:

107-112

Citation:

Online since:

January 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Murayama, Z. Horita and K. Hono: Acta Mater. 49 (2001), 21-29.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Mao, S.B. Kang and J.O. Park: J. Mater. Process. Tech. 159 (2005), 314-320.

Google Scholar

[3] S.B. Kang, C.Y. Lim, H.W. Kim and J. Mao: Mat. Sci. Forum 396-402 (2002), 1163-1168.

Google Scholar

[4] I. Gutierrez-Urrutia, M.A. Munoz-Morris and D.G. Morris: Mat. Sci. Eng. A-Struct., in press (available in www. sciencedirect. com).

Google Scholar

[5] J.K. Kim, H.G. Jeong, S.I. Hong, Y.S. Kim and W.J. Kim: Scripta Mater. 45 (2001), 901-907.

Google Scholar

[6] Y.H. Zhao, X.Z. Liao, Z. Jin, R.Z. Valiev and Y.T. Zhu: Acta Mater. 52 (2004), 4589-4599.

Google Scholar

[7] W.J. Kim, J.K. Kim, T.Y. Park, S.I. Hong, D.I. Kim and Y.S. Kim: Metall. Mater. Trans. A 33 (2002), 3155-3164.

Google Scholar

[8] W.J. Kim, C.S. Chung, D.S. Ma, S.I. Hong and H.K. Kim: Scripta Mater. 49 (2003), 333-338.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Popovic and B. Verlinden: Mater. Sci. Techn. (accepted for publication).

Google Scholar

[10] S. Ringer, K. Hono, T. Sakurai and I.J. Polmear: Scripta Mater. 36 (1997), 517-521.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6462(96)00415-0

Google Scholar

[11] P. Ratchev, B. Verlinden, P. De Smet and P. Van Houtte: Acta Mater. 46 (1998), 3523-3533.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(98)00033-0

Google Scholar