Superplastic Deformation of Magnesium Alloy AZ31 under Biaxial Loading Condition

Article Preview

Abstract:

Accurate constitutive modeling of superplastic deformation is critical for successful simulation and optimization of superplastic forming. The selection of the forming pressure profiles in gas blow forming of superplastic materials is still based on trial and error due to the limited predictive capabilities of current models describing superplastic deformation. In general, these models are based on uniaxial loading condition, assuming isotropic behavior. In this work, we examine the biaxial bulge forming of AZ31 magnesium alloy using pressure profiles derived from different available analytical models. The results clearly show the need for more accurate description of superplastic deformation to improve predictive capabilities. In addition, a pressure profile that is generated using FE in conjunction with a microstructure-based constitutive model is used and the results indicate better ability to predict the height of the bulged sheet.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 551-552)

Pages:

219-224

Citation:

Online since:

July 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. Schumann and F. Friedrich in : Mg Alloys and their Applications, Wolfsburg, Germany (1998).

Google Scholar

[2] F. K. Abu-Farha and M. K. Khraisheh in : 8th ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming, Cluj-Napoca, Romania (2005), p.627.

Google Scholar

[3] C. Hamilton, H. Zbib, C. Johnson and C. Richter in : 2nd SAMPE, Chipa, Japan (1991), p.279.

Google Scholar

[4] A. Dutta and M. Mukherjee: Materials Science and Engineering, A157 (1992), p.9.

Google Scholar

[5] L. Carrino and G. Guiliano: International Journal of Mechanical Science, Vol. 39 (1997), p.193.

Google Scholar

[6] F. K. Abu-Farha and M. K. Khraisheh: Mater. Sci. Forum, Vol. 447-448 (2004), p.165.

Google Scholar

[7] F. K. Abu-Farha and M. K. Khraisheh: Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, Vol. 127 (2005), p.159.

Google Scholar

[8] F. Abu-Farha and M. Khraisheh; Journal of Materials Engineering & Performance, in press.

Google Scholar

[9] D. Banabic, T. Balan and D. -S. Comsa: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 115 (2001), p.83.

Google Scholar

[10] D. Holt: International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 12 (1970), p.491.

Google Scholar

[11] F. Jovane: International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 10 (1968), p.403.

Google Scholar

[14] F. Kaiser, D. Letzig, J. Bohlen, A. Styczynski, C. Hartig and K. Kainer: Mater. Sci. Forum, Vol. 419-422 (2003), p.315.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.419-422.315

Google Scholar

[12] K. Siegert, S. Jäger and M. Vulcan: Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 52 (2003), p.241.

Google Scholar

[13] H. Yang and A. Mukherjee: International Journal of Mechanical Science, Vol. 34 (1992), p.283.

Google Scholar

[15] M. Khraisheh, H. Zbib, C. Hamilton and A. Bayoumi: International Journal of Plasticity, Vol. 13 (1997), p.143.

Google Scholar