Paper Titles

Manufacturing Technologies for Small Lot Size, Short Cycle Time and Low Cost
p.821

Advanced Plastic Processing Techniques for the Densification of Spray Deposited Preforms
p.827

Effects of Friction on Precision Forging Process of Blade with a Damper Platform
p.831

Texture Aspects of Deformation Processes under Equal-Channel Angular Pressing of Metals
p.835

Development of Substructure Non-Uniformity under Equal-Channel Angular Pressing
p.839

Butt Joining of Dissimilar Sheets by Shot Peening
p.843

Formation of Ultrafine Grained Structure in SUS 304 Stainless Steel Produced by High Pressure Torsion (HPT)
p.847

Lining of Carbon Steel with Metal Foils by Shot Peening
p.853

Preparation of Homogeneous Fe-Al Intermetallic Compound Sheet by Multi-Layered Rolling and Subsequent Heat Treatment
p.857

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vols. 561-565Development of Substructure Non-Uniformity under...

Development of Substructure Non-Uniformity under Equal-Channel Angular Pressing

Article Preview

Abstract:

By taking into account an interconnection between substructure non-uniformity and substructure anisotropy, a new approach to study the substructure non-uniformity is developed as applied to metal rods, subjected to Equal-Channel Angular Pressing (ECAP). The X-ray method of Generalized Pole Figures (GPF) was used for construction of distributions of substructure parameters. Some experimental data are presented, illustrating possibilities and efficiency of the used approach.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

PRICM 6

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 561-565)

Pages:

839-842

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.561-565.839

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2007

Authors:

Margarita Isaenkova, Yuriy Perlovich, Vladimir Fesenko, M. Grekhov

Keywords:

Anisotropy, Equal-Channel Angular Pressing (ECAP), Generalized Pole Figure, Non-Uniformity, Substructure

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Yu. Perlovich, H.J. Bunge and M. Isaenkova: Text. & Microstr., Vol. 29 (1997), pp.241-266.

[2] Yu. Perlovich and M. Isaenkova: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, Vol. 33A (2002), pp.867-874.

[3] B.E. Warren: X-ray Diffraction (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Massachusetts) (1969).

[4] G.K. Williamson and R.E. Smallman: Phil. Mag., Vol. 1 (1956), p.34.

[5] Yu. Perlovich, M. Isaenkova, V. Fesenko et al.: Mat. Sci. Forum Vol. 503-504 (2006), p.853.

[6] Yu. Perlovich, M. Isaenkova, V. Fesenko et al.: Mat. Sci. Forum Vol. 503-504 (2006), p.859.

25 50 75 100.

[20] [40] [60] [0] 0. 05 0. 1 0. 15.

[10] [20] [30] 0. 1.

[10] [20] [30] [1] 10 0. 01.

25 50 75 100 Dc, nm.

[20] [40] [60] [0] 0. 05 0. 1 0. 15 εc.

[10] [20] [30] 0. 1 ρc, 1014 m-2.

[10] [20] [30] [1] 10 0. 01 ν, % ν, % ν, % ν, % ν, % ν, % 1M 1M 1M 2M 2M 2M Fig. 3. Substructure parameters (D, ε, ρ) for M-region of Ti rods along axes <0001>; 1 and 2 ECAP passes.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7421/supp-10

[10] [20] a.

[10] 200 0. 4 0. 8 1. 2 1. 6 β(0002), deg.

[10] [20] [30] b c ν, % ν, % ν.

[1] [2] Fig. 4. Distributions ν(β0002) for ECAP Zr rods, route C: (a) 1 pass; (b) 4 passes; (c) coldrolled(1) and annealed (480 o C) (2) cladding tube, Zr-1%Nb. -0. 3 0. 3 ∆c/cav.

[4] [8] [0] [4] [8] ν, % -0. 15 0. 15 ν, % a b.

Fig. 5. Distributions ν(∆c/cav): (a) ECAP Zr rod, 1 pass; (b) cold-rolled cladding tube, Zr-1%Nb.