The Optimal Model of Tool Paths Generation for Pocket Milling

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper describes an integrated method to determine optimal cutting parameters for milling pocket based on minimum cutting time. The main constraints entailed in real cutting, such as chatter free, uncut free tool paths, cutter and machine tool limitations, are included into the optimal model. The optimal parameters (depth of cut, width of cut, spindle speed) are inserted into the tool paths generation directly for four kinds of conventional cutting modes (Zig and Zig-Zag parallel cutting mode, inwards and outwards spiral pattern modes). According to the fact that the first cut in every cut level is slotting milling, the milling areas are divided into slotting milling area and general milling area. This dynamically corrected tool paths generation method changes the order of conventional tool paths, so different cutting parameters are used in slotting milling and general milling areas. The case study has demonstrated that the proposed methods can identify the optimal milling conditions and generate tool paths automatically and result in minimum milling time.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 626-627)

Pages:

201-206

Citation:

Online since:

August 2009

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2009 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. Engin, Y. Altintas: International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture Vol. 41(2001), pp.2195-2212.

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Altintas: Machine Science and Technology Vol. 4(3)(2000), pp.445-478.

Google Scholar

[3] J. Tlusty: Manufacturing Processes and Equipment(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2000).

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Altintas, E. Budak: Annals of the CIRP Vol. 44 (1)(1995), pp.357-362.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Tekeli, E. Budak: Machining Science and Technology No. 9(2005), pp.147-167.

Google Scholar

[6] C. K. Toh: Journal of Materials Processing Technology Vol. 152(3)(2004), pp.346-356.

Google Scholar

[7] S. Hinduja, A. Roaydi, P. Philimis and G. Barrow: International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture No. 41(2001) pp.687-702.

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(00)00098-5

Google Scholar

[8] S. Hinduja, Y.S. MA and G. Barrow: Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact Vol. 35(5)(1995), p.689- 699.

Google Scholar

[9] M. weck, Y. Altintas and C. Beer: Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact Vol. 34(6)(1994), p.879-891 0. 1 0. 2 0. 3 0. 4 0. 5 0. 6 0. 7 0. 8 0. 9 1.

Google Scholar

[4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] The relative width of cut The effective milling time(s) SOLID: Parallel DASH: Inwards Point: Outwards Fig. 4 Comparison of machining time for parallel, inwards and outwards spiral mode.

Google Scholar

[5] [10] [15] [20] [25] [30] [35] [40] [45] [50] 0 0. 1 0. 2 0. 3 0. 4 0. 5 0. 6 0. 7 0. 8 0. 9 1 The Relative Width of Cut(mm) The Depth of Cut(mm) X Direction(15000rpm) Y Direction(15000rpm) Toque/Pow er limit Fig. 3 Chatter stability curves along x and y direction.

Google Scholar