Creep Properties of SUS304 Steel by Small Punch Creep Tests

Article Preview

Abstract:

Creep behavior of SUS304 stainless steel is studied by small punch creep (SP-C) test. Series of SP-C testing for SUS304 stainless steel are carried out at 600°C. The time dependence of the central deflection is obtained by the SP-C testing at different load level and the creep deflection curves are quantitatively similar to those observed in conventional uniaxial creep testing. In this paper, an analytic approach based on Chakrebarty’s membrane-stretch model is used to interpret the SP-C test method. The relationship between specimen central deflection and equivalent strain is deduced, and the relationship between load and equivalent stress are established. The creep stress exponent of SUS304 stainless steel is determined by the theory formula and the data obtained in the SP-C testing. Comparison of the creep stress exponent of the Norton equations in SP-C testing and conventional creep testing is performed. The results show that the creep stress exponent is well consistent with conventional experimental results.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 631-632)

Pages:

387-392

Citation:

Online since:

October 2009

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Kameda, J. and Buck, O. Mater Sci Eng, Vol. 83(1986), p.29.

Google Scholar

[2] Misawa, T., Adachi, T. Saito, M. and Hamaguchi, Y. J Nucl Mater, Vol. 150(1987), p.194.

Google Scholar

[3] Joo, Y. -H., Hashida, T., and Takahashi, H. J Testing Eval, Vol. 20(1992), p.6.

Google Scholar

[4] Song S. -H., Foulkner R.G., Flewitt P.E.J., Smith R.F., Marmy P., Victoria M. J Nucl Mater, Vol. 280(2000), p.162.

Google Scholar

[5] Fleury E, Ha JS. Int J Pressure Vessels Piping, Vol. 75(1998), p.699.

Google Scholar

[6] Mao X., Takahashi H., Kodaira T. Scr Metall, Vol. 25(1991), p.2487.

Google Scholar

[7] Foulds J.R., Woytowitz P.J., Parnell T.K., Jewell C.W. J Testing Eval, Vol. 23(1995), p.3.

Google Scholar

[8] Ha JS, Fleury E. Int J Pressure Vessels Piping, Vol. 75(1998), p.707.

Google Scholar

[9] Paker, J. D. and James, J. D. ASME, PVP-Vol. 279( 1994), p.167.

Google Scholar

[10] Ule B, Sustar T, Dobes F. Nucl Eng Des, Vol. 192(1999), p.1.

Google Scholar

[11] Dobes F, Milicka K. J Testing Eval, Vol. 29(2001), p.31.

Google Scholar

[12] Dobes F, Milicka K, Kratochvil P. Intermetallics, Vol. 12(2004), p.1397.

Google Scholar

[13] Komazaki, S., Hashida, T., Shoji, T. and Suzuki, K. J Testing Eval, Vol. 28(2000), p.249.

Google Scholar

[14] Saucedo-Munoz M. L., Komazaki, S., Takahashi T., Hashida, T. and Shoji T. J Mater Res, Vol. 17(2002), p. (1945).

Google Scholar

[15] Zhai P. C., Toshiyuki H., Shin-ichi K. and Zhang Q.J. J Testing Eval, vol. 32(2004), p.298.

Google Scholar

[16] Patrick E., Maurice P. W., Fereydoun L. and Michael J. C. Comput Mater Sci, Vol. 40(2007), p.33.

Google Scholar

[17] Xiang L., Zheng Y. Y., You Y. J. and Chen Y. X. Int J Pressure Vessels Piping, Vol. 84(2007), p.304.

Google Scholar

[18] Chakrabarty J. Int J Mech Sci,Vol. 12 (1970), p.315.

Google Scholar

[19] Zhen Y., Z. W. Wang. Int J Pressure Vessels Piping, Vol. 80 (2003), p.397.

Google Scholar