Strength Prediction and Experimental Validation of Adhesive Joints Including Polyethylene, Carbon-Epoxy and Aluminium Adherends

Article Preview

Abstract:

Polyolefins are especially difficult to bond due to their non-polar, non-porous and chemically inert surfaces. Acrylic adhesives used in industry are particularly suited to bond these materials, including many grades of polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene (PE), without special surface preparation. In this work, the tensile strength of single-lap PE and mixed joints bonded with an acrylic adhesive was investigated. The mixed joints included PE with aluminium (AL) or carbon fibre reinforced plastic (CFRP) substrates. The PE substrates were only cleaned with isopropanol, which assured cohesive failures. For the PE CFRP joints, three different surfaces preparations were employed for the CFRP substrates: cleaning with acetone, abrasion with 100 grit sand paper and peel-ply finishing. In the PE AL joints, the AL bonding surfaces were prepared by the following methods: cleaning with acetone, abrasion with 180 and 320 grit sand papers, grit blasting and chemical etching with chromic acid. After abrasion of the CFRP and AL substrates, the surfaces were always cleaned with acetone. The tensile strengths were compared with numerical results from ABAQUS® and a mixed mode (I+II) cohesive damage model. A good agreement was found between the experimental and numerical results, except for the PE AL joints, since the AL surface treatments were not found to be effective.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 636-637)

Pages:

1157-1164

Citation:

Online since:

January 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M.D. Green, F.J. Guild and R.D. Adams: Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. Vol 22 (2002), p.81.

Google Scholar

[2] S. Bhowmik, T.K. Chaki, S. Ray, F. Hoffman and L. Dorn: Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. Vol. 24, (2004), p.461.

Google Scholar

[3] D.A. Bigwood and A.D. Crocombe: Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. Vol 10 (1990), p.31.

Google Scholar

[4] E. Dragoni and P. Mauri: Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. Vol 20 (2000), p.315.

Google Scholar

[5] S. K Panigrahi and B. Pradhan: J. Reinf. Plastics Compos. Vol 26 (2007), p.183.

Google Scholar

[6] R.D.S.G. Campilho, M.F.S.F. de Moura and J.J.M.S. Domingues: J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. Vol. 21 (2007), p.855.

Google Scholar

[7] R.D.S.G. Campilho, M.F.S.F. de Moura and J.J.M.S. Domingues: Compos. Sci. Technol. Vol. 65 (2005), p. (1948).

Google Scholar

[8] M.S. Kafkalidis and M.D. Thouless: Int. J. Solids Struct. Vol 39 (2002), p.4367.

Google Scholar

[9] A.M.G. Pinto, A.G. Magalhães, R.D.S.G. Campilho, M.F.S.F. de Moura, A.P.M. Baptista: J. Adhesion Vol 85 (2009), p.351.

Google Scholar

[10] A.M.G. Pinto, A.G. Magalhães, F.G. da Silva and A.P.M. Baptista: Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. Vol. 28 (2008), p.452.

Google Scholar