Analysis of Strength Scaling Effect in Portuguese Limestone: Comparison between Three- and Four-Point Bending Tests

Abstract:

This paper presents a comparative study between 3- and 4-point bending tests applied to five Portuguese limestones. The study has been conducted on sawed limestone specimens, all showing the same surface finishing. The materials were compared for two distinct situations: i) using a 3-point flexure loading configuration in batches of materials with larger cross sectional specimen dimension (50 × 30 mm2); and ii) using a 4-point flexure loading configuration in the same batch of materials but with smaller cross sectional dimensions (30 × 25 mm2). In all situations, the materials have broken due to intrinsic volume defects. Formulae for the effective volumes and effective surfaces for rectangular beam specimens loaded in flexure were reviewed in order to analyse the strength scaling effect. The results show the applicability of the Weibull statistics to explain the differences in the results of the 3-point and 4-point bending tests, even when different cross sectional sizes are employed. Among other important remarks, in all the different limestone specimens used it was possible to confirm that the strength values determined experimentally via 3-point bending are of the same order as those estimated for the same loading configuration but via experimental data of 4-point bending tests using the Weibull strength scaling approach, even if employing a different cross-sectional dimension.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volumes 636-637)
• Pages: 1336-1341
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.636-637.1336
• Online since: January 2010
• Authors: Jorge Cruz Fernandes, Vera Pires, Pedro M. Amaral, Luis Guerra Rosa
• Keywords: Flexural Strength, Limestone Mechanical Behaviour, Strength Scaling Effect, Weibull Statistics

References

[1] ASTM C 1239 - 06A, Annual book of ASTM standards 2007: Standard Practice for Uniaxial Strength Data and Estimating Weibull Distribution Parameters for Advanced Ceramics.

DOI: 10.1520/c1239-13

[2] L.G. Rosa, J. Lamon, I. Figueiredo, F.A.C. Oliveira: A method to distinguish extrinsic and intrinsic fracture-origin populations in monolithic ceramics, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 26 (2006) p.3887.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.12.006

[3] D.J. Green: An Introduction to the Mechanical Properties of Ceramics, Cambridge Solid State Science Series, Cambridge University Press, (1998).

[4] G.D. Quinn: Weibull strength scaling for standardized rectangular flexure specimens, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2003, 86(3), p.508.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03329.x

[5] D.G.S. Davies: The statistical approach to engineering design in ceramics", Proc. Br. Ceram. Soc., 22, 429-52 (1973).

[6] P.M. Amaral, J.C. Fernandes and L.G. Rosa Weibull statistical analysis of granite bending strength, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Vol. 41(6) 2008, p.917.

DOI: 10.1007/s00603-007-0154-7

[7] EN 12372: 1999. Determination of Flexural Strength under Concentrated Load. Brussels : CEN - European Committee for Standardization.

[8] EN 13161: 2007. Determination of Flexural Strength under Constant Moment. Brussels : CEN - European Committee for Standardization. 12 mm 12 mm MC-A MC-B.