Polynomial vs. Mechanism-Based Response Surface Analysis of the Thermomechanical Treatment of Al-Sn Alloys

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effects of strain, annealing time and temperature during the processing of an Al-Sn-based triboalloy were researched by response surface analysis. A second-degree polynomial in strain-time-temperature space was compared to a formulation based on generally accepted physical models for recrystallisation, recovery and grain growth, using the rule of mixtures for a microstructure consisting of recovered, recrystallised and second-phase grains. The polynomial approach provides interesting information on the role of rolling reduction in the optimisation of the alloy. The mechanism-based approach yields higher precision with less fitting parameters and provides insight into the relative importance of the physical phenomena involved in the processing of an alloy which has rarely been studied from the viewpoint of physical metallurgy.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 638-642)

Pages:

321-326

Citation:

Online since:

January 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. Schouwenaars, J. A. Torres, V. H. Jacobo and A. Ortiz: Mater Sci Forum 539-543 (2007) 317-322.

Google Scholar

[2] R. Schouwenaars, V.H. Jacobo, A. Ortiz. Wear 263 (2007) 727-735.

Google Scholar

[3] Cahn, R.W., Recovery and Recrystallization, in Physical Metallurgy, R.W. Cahn and P. Haasen, eds. Elsivier Science Publishers, (1983).

Google Scholar

[4] Humphreys, F.J. and Hatherly, M. Recrystallisation and related annealing phenomena. Elsevier Science, Netherlands, (1995).

Google Scholar

[5] Martin, J.W., Dohery, R.D. cantor, B. Stability of microstructure in metallic systems. Cambridge University press, Cambridge, GB, (1997).

Google Scholar

[6] Doherty, R.D., Hughes, D.A., Humphreys, F.J., Jonas, J.J., Juul Jensen, D., Kassner, M.E., King, W.E., McNelly, T.R., McQueen, H.J. Rollet, A.D. Mater. Sci. Eng. A238 (1997) 219.

Google Scholar

[7] Wang, Y.M., Ma, E. Acta Mater. 52 (2004) 1699.

Google Scholar

[8] Montgomery, D.A. Design and analysis of experiments. John Wiley & Sons, New York, (1996).

Google Scholar

[9] Long, J.B. and Hampshire, W. Tin. In: Metals Handbook, 10th ed., Vol 2. ASM International, (1990).

Google Scholar

[10] Kocks, U.F. and Mecking, H. Prog. mater. sci. 48 (2003) 171-273.

Google Scholar

[11] Hall, E. O., Proc. R. Soc. Lond., 1951, B64, 474.

Google Scholar

[12] Petch, N. J., J. Iron Steel Inst., 1953, 174, 25.

Google Scholar

[13] Hansen N. Materials Science and Engineering A 409 (2005) 39-45.

Google Scholar

[14] Kuhlmann, D. Z. fur. Phys. 124 (1948), 468.

Google Scholar

[15] Cottrel, A.H. and Aytekin, V., J. Inst. Metals 77, (1950) 389.

Google Scholar

[16] Furu, T., Marthinsen, K and Nes, E. Mater. sci. Tech. 6 (1990) 1093.

Google Scholar

[17] Vandermeer, R.A. and Rath, B.B. Metall Trans A, 20A (1989) 391.

Google Scholar

[18] Johnsonn, W.A. and Mehl, R.F. Trans. Metall. Soc. A.I.M.E. 135 (1939) 416.

Google Scholar

[19] Avrami, M. J. Chem. Phys 7, (1939) 1103.

Google Scholar

[20] Kolmogorov, A.N. Izv. Akad. Nauk USSR-Ser-Matemat. 1 (3) (1937), 355.

Google Scholar

[21] Burke, J.E. and Turnbull, D. Prog. Metal. Phys. 3 (1952), 220.

Google Scholar