A Sensitivity Study of Grain Growth Model For Prediction of ECT and CET Transformations in Continuous Casting of Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

A two dimensional model was developed to predict the grain structure (Equiaxed to Columnar Transformation (ECT) and Columnar to Equiaxed Transformation (CET) in the continuous casting of steel. The processes of nucleation, growth and impingement of the grains are modelled as follows: (I) the nucleation is modeled through a continuous dependency of the nucleation density on temperature by the Gaussian distribution. Different nucleation parameters are used at the boundary and in the bulk region. (II) The growth and impingement are modeled by the Kurz, Giovanola, Trivedi (KGT) model. The Cellular Automata (CA) technique is used to solve the model. The CA method is based on the Nastac’s and simplified neighborhoods. Calculations are shown for square billets of the dimension 140 mm. Fixed input parameter of the model represents the macroscopic temperature field obtained from the Štore Steel billet simulation system [1]. All other grain structure physical model parameters are varied, such as: the surface and the bulk area, mean nucleation undercooling, standard deviation of undercooling, maximum density of nuclei. The computational parameters, such as the micro mesh size and the time step are varied as well. The influence of the variation of different parameters on calculated grain structure is shown. Finally, the model parameters are adjusted in order to obtain the experimentally determined actual billet ECT and CET positions for 51CrV4+Mo spring steel (Al: 0.02, Cr: 1.05, Cu: 0.125, Mn: 0.9,Mo: 0.025, Ni: 0.1, Si: 0.275, V: 0.155, C: 0.51, P: 0.0125, S: 0.0275 wt%). A systematic procedure is outlined for adjusting of the model data with the experiment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

373-378

Citation:

Online since:

May 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B. Šarler, R. Vertnik, H. Gjerkes, A. Lorbiecka, G. Manjolović, J. Cesar, B. Marčič and M. Sabolič: WSEAS Transactions on System and Control, Vol. 1 (2006), p.294.

Google Scholar

[2] H. Fredriksson and U. Akerlind: Materials Processings during Casting (John Wiley & Sons, UK 2006).

Google Scholar

[3] K.G.H. Janssens, D. Raabe, E. Kozeschnik, M.A. Miodownik and B. Nestler: Computational Materials Engineering (Elsevier Academic Press, UK 2007).

Google Scholar

[4] A.Z. Lorbiecka, R. Vertnik, H. Gjerkeš, B. Šarler, G. Manjolović, B. Senčić and J. Cesar: submitted to CMC: Computers, Materials & Continua Vol. 8 (2009), p.195.

Google Scholar

[5] R. Vertnik and B. Šarler: submitted to Cast Metals Research, in press.

Google Scholar

[6] K.Y. Lee and Ch.P. Hongs: ISIJ International Vol. 37 (1997), p.38.

Google Scholar

[7] W. Kurz, B. Giovanola and R. Trivedi: Acta Metall. Vol. 34 (1986), p.823.

Google Scholar

[8] W. Kurz and D.J. Fisher: Fundamentals of solidification (Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland 1998).

Google Scholar

[9] M. Yamazaki, Y. Natsume, H. Harada and K. Ohsasa: ISIJ International Vol. 46 (2006), p.903.

Google Scholar

[10] M. Rappaz, M. Bellet and M. Deville: �umerical Modelling in Materials Science and Engineering (Springer Publisher, Germany 2003).

Google Scholar

[11] L. Nastac: Modeling and Simulation of Microstructure Evolution in Solidifying Alloys (Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands 2004).

Google Scholar

[12] M.F. Zhu and C.P. Hong: ISIJ International Vol. 41 (2001), p.436.

Google Scholar

[13] Q.Y. Xu and B.C. Liu: Materials Transactions Vol. 42 (2001), p.2316.

Google Scholar