Densification Behavior in Spark-Plasma-Sintering of MgAl2O4 Spinel

Article Preview

Abstract:

The densification mechanism in park-plasma-sintering (SPS) processing was examined in MgAl2O4 spinel. As the relative density ρt increases, that is, as the effective stress σeff decreases, stress exponent n evaluated from effective stress-densification rate relationship continuously varies from n  4 to n  1. TEM observation shows that significant stacking faults caused by partial dislocations are frequently observed in the low ρt region. The results suggest that, for spinel, the predominant densification mechanism in SPS processing changes with ρt from plastic flow by a partial dislocation motion in the low ρt region (n  4) to diffusion-related creep in the high ρt region (n  1).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 654-656)

Pages:

1986-1989

Citation:

Online since:

June 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Z. A. Munir, U. Anselmi-Tamburini and M. Ohyanagi: J. Mater. Sci., Vol. 41 (2006), p.763.

Google Scholar

[2] R. Orrù, R. Licheri, A. M. Locci, A. Cincotti and G. Cao: Mat. Sci. Eng. R, Vol. 63 (2009), p.127.

Google Scholar

[3] K. Morita, B. -N. Kim, K. Hiraga and H. Yoshida: Scripta Mater. Vol. 58 (2008), p.1114.

Google Scholar

[4] K. Morita, B. -N. Kim, K. Hiraga and H. Yoshida: J. Am. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 92 (2009), p.1208.

Google Scholar

[5] R. Chaim and M. Margulis: Mat. Sci. Eng. A, Vol. 407 (2005), p.180.

Google Scholar

[6] G. Bernard-Granger, N. Benameur, A. Addad, M. Nygren, C. Guizard and S. Deville: J. Mater. Res. Vol. 24 (2009), p. (2011).

DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2009.0243

Google Scholar

[7] C. -J Ting and H. -Y. Lu: Acta Mater. Vol. 47 (1999), p.817.

Google Scholar

[8] R. L. Coble: J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 41 (1970), p.4798.

Google Scholar

[9] M. N. Rahaman: Sintering of Ceramics (Taylor & Francis Group, CRC Press, (2008).

Google Scholar

[10] A. S. Helle, K. E. Easterling and M. F. Ashby: Acta Mater. Vol. 33 (1985), p.2163.

Google Scholar

[11] K. Morita, B. -N. Kim, K. Hiraga and H. Yoshida: to be submitted.

Google Scholar

[12] D. R. Pummler and H. Palmour III: J. Am. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 51 (1968), p.320.

Google Scholar

[13] R. J. Bratton, G. R. Terwilliger and S. M. Ho: J. Mat. Sci. Vol. 7 (1972), p.1363.

Google Scholar

[14] T. E. Mitchell: J. Am. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 82 (1999), p.3305.

Google Scholar

[15] C. -J. Ting and H. -Y. Lu: Acta Mater. Vol. 47 (1999), p.831. 2nm2nm2nm2nm (a)(a)(a)(a) (d)(d)(d)(d) (c)(c)(c)(c) (b)(b)(b)(b) 200nm200nm200nm200nm 100nm100nm100nm100nm gggg220 220 220 220 gggg440 440 440 440.

Google Scholar