Film Fraction and Droplet Size inside of a Rectangular Venturi Scrubber

Article Preview

Abstract:

The Venturi scrubber, equipment frequently used in the removal of particles from gases, is constituted basically by a duct with a convergent section followed by a constriction, or throat, and a divergent section. A liquid, usually injected in the throat, is atomized by the flowing air at high speed. The formed droplets act as collectors of particles from the gas. The process of droplet formation from an injected liquid can be described as follows: the liquid enters the gas stream in the form of a jet, perpendicular to the gas flow. As the jet penetrates the gas stream, it is bent by the gas drag. After a given penetration distance, a burst occurs, and the remaining jet is disintegrated as a droplet cloud. Depending on the liquid and gas flow rates, the penetration on the jet into the gas stream may reach the walls of the equipment, and a fraction of liquid deposits in the form of a film. This film contributes little for the removal of particles from the dust laden gas. Few studies have analyzed the formation of film at the scrubber walls and its influence in the droplet size inside the Venturi scrubber. For this reason, the present study is focused on the experimental measurement of the deposition of the liquid film on the walls of a rectangular Venturi scrubber and, simultaneously, the estimation of the droplet size measured in the Venturi throat. The experiments were carried out varying the liquid flow rate, the gas velocity and the number of orifices of liquid injection. A correlation, using a dimensionless number, was proposed to quantify the influence of each experimental condition. The results indicate that film fraction has a significant influence in the droplet size measured inside of Venturi scrubber.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 660-661)

Pages:

549-554

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. Viswanathan, C.C. ST. Pierre and A.W. Gnyp: Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 61 (1983), p.504.

Google Scholar

[2] M.A.F. Daher, V.G. Guerra, J.A.S. Gonçalves, J.R. Coury: submitted to Int. J. Environment and Waste Management (2008).

Google Scholar

[3] S. Nukiyama and Y. Tanasawa: Transactions of the Society of Mechanical Engineers Vol. 4 (1938), p.86.

Google Scholar

[4] R.H. Boll, L.S. Flais, P.W. Maurer and W.L. Thompson: Journal of the Air Pollution Control Assocition Vol. 24 (1974), p.934.

Google Scholar

[5] A. H Lefebvre: Atomization and Sprays (Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York 1989).

Google Scholar

[6] H.F. Liu, W.F. Li, X. Gong, X.K. Cao, J.L. Xu, X.L. Chen, Y.F. Wang, G.S. Yu, F.C. Wang and Z.H. Yu: Chemical Engineering and Processing Vol. 45 (2006), p.240.

Google Scholar

[7] V.G. Guerra, M.A.F. Daher, M.V. Rodrigues, J.A.S. Gonçalves and J.R. Coury: Mater. Sci. Fórum Vols. 591-593 (2008), p.896.

Google Scholar

[8] V. Cleary, P. Bowen and H. Witlox: Journal of Hazardous Materials Vol. 142 (2007) p.786.

Google Scholar

[9] K. Krishna, T.K. Kim, K.D. Kihm, W.J. Rogers and M.S. Mannan: Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries Vol. 16 (2003), p.1.

Google Scholar

[10] K.D. Kihm, G.M. Lyn and S.Y. Son: Atomization and Sprays Vol. 5 (1995), p.417.

Google Scholar

[11] B.K. Park, J.S. Lee and K.D. Kihm: Atomization and Sprays Vol. 6 (1996), p.285.

Google Scholar

[12] K.D. Kihm and N. Chigier: Atomization and Sprays Vol. 1 (1991), p.113.

Google Scholar

[13] K.J. Hay, Zi-Chao Liu and T.J. Hanratty: International Journal of Multiphase Flow Vol. 22 (1996), p.829.

Google Scholar

[14] L. Bayvel and Z. Orzechowski: Liquid Atomization (Taylor & Francis, Washington D. C 1993).

Google Scholar