2Mg-Fe Alloy Processed by Hot Extrusion: Influence of Particle Size and Extrusion Reduction Ratio on Hydrogenation Properties

Article Preview

Abstract:

Samples of a 2Mg-Fe (at.%) mixture were produced by high energy ball-milling (HEBM) with ball to powder ratio = 20:1, in an argon gas atmosphere, in 190 ml vials (sample-1) to produce powders and in 300 ml vials (sample-2) to produce plates. Both samples were cold-pressed into preforms. The preforms were then extruded at 300°C at a ram speed of 1mm/min., with the following extrusion ratios: sample-1 at 3/1 to ensure porosity and sample-2 at 5/1 to increase the adhesion of the plates. The resulting bulks from samples 1 and 2 were hydrogenated for 24h in a reactor under 15 bar of H2 to produce the Mg2FeH6 complex hydride, and at 11 bar of H2 to produce both the complex hydride and MgH2 hydride. In addition, sample-1 was severely temperature-hydrogen cycled to verify its microstructural stability and the influence of grain size on the sorption properties. XRD patterns showed Mg(hc), Fe(ccc) and Mg2FeH6 in both samples, and sample-2 also contained MgH2 and MgO (attributed to processing contamination). DSC results demonstrated that the initial desorption temperature of sample-1 was lower than that of sample-2. However, sample-2 showed faster desorption kinetics, presenting a desorption peak about 73°C below that of sample-1. This could be attributed to the activation/catalyst effect of the MgH2 hydride. The improvement in sorption properties was attributed mainly to porosity and to the type of employed catalysts.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3-9

Citation:

Online since:

June 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Züttel, P. Wenger, P. Sudan, P. Mauron, S. -I. Orimo S-I. Mater. Sci. and Eng. B. Vol. 108 (2004), pp.9-18.

Google Scholar

[2] B. Bogdanović, A. Reiser, K. Schlichte, B. Spliethoff, B. Tesche. J. Alloys Compd. Vol. 345 (2002), pp.77-89.

Google Scholar

[3] J.J. Didisheim, P. Zolliker, K. Yvon, P. Fischer, J. Schefer, M. Gubelmann, A.F. Williams. Inorg. Chem. Vol. 23 (1984), p.1953-(1957).

DOI: 10.1021/ic00181a032

Google Scholar

[4] B. Sakintuna, F. Lamari-Darkrimb, M. Hirscher. Int. J Hydrogen Energy. Vol. 32 (2007), p.1121 –1140.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Porcu, A.K. Petford-Long, J.M. Sykes. J. Alloys Compd. Vol. 453 (2008), pp.341-346.

Google Scholar

[6] N. Hanada, E. Hirotoshi, T, Ichikawa, E. Akiba, H. Fujii. J. Alloys Compd. Vol. 450 (2008), pp.395-399.

Google Scholar

[7] G.F. Lima, A.M. Jorge Jr, D.R. Leiva, C.S. Kiminami, C. Bolfarini, W.J. Botta. J. Phys.: Conf. Series Vol. 144 (2009), p.012015.

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/144/1/012015

Google Scholar

[8] T.T. Ueda, M. Tsukahara, Y. Kamiya, S. Kikuchi. J. Alloys and Compd. Vol. 386 (2005), pp.253-257.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Dufour, J. Huot. J. Alloys and Compd. Vol. 439 (2007), p. L5–L7.

Google Scholar

[10] J. Dufour, J. Huot. J. Alloys and Compd. Vol. 446-447 (2007), p.147–151.

Google Scholar

[11] N. Takeichi, K. Tanaka, H. Tanaka, T.T. Ueda, Y. Kamiya, M. Tsukahara, H. Miyamura, S. Kikuchi. J. Alloys and Compd. Vo. 446–447 (2007), p.543–548.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.04.220

Google Scholar

[12] Y. Kusadome, K. Ikeda, Y. Nakamori, S. Orimo, Z. Horita. Scripta Materialia. Vol. 57 (2007), pp.751-53.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.06.042

Google Scholar

[13] L. LUTTEROTTI, R. CECCATO, R. DAL MASCHIO, E. PAGANI. Materials Science Forum. Vol. 87 (1998), pp.278-281.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.278-281.87

Google Scholar

[14] L. LUTTEROTTI. MAUD - Materials Analysis Using Diffraction. Information and download on http: /www. ing. unitn. it/~maud/. Acessed from 08/09/2008 to 09/06/(2010).

Google Scholar