Creep Stress Analyses Affected by Load Properties on P91 Pipe with Local Wall Thinning under High Temperature

Abstract:

The local wall thinning defect is very normal on pipes in power plants, which may result in stress redistribution of the pipes during the service process at elevated temperature. For the purpose of understanding the stress redistribution and strain accumulation of pipes with local wall thinning affected by load properties under creep condition, three groups of models were calculated, using three-dimensional elastic-plastic finite element analyses (FEA) based on FEA codes ABAQUS. In this study, the pipes has an identical defect of local wall thinning, the load properties and values are changed. Three groups of load properties, considering here, were monotonic internal pressure, monotonic moment and both internal pressure and moment, respectively. The numerical simulation conducted on P91 full-scale steel pipes at 625°C, with local wall thinning located at the inner surface. Then, von Mises stress and creep strain of pipes after 100,000h could be obtained corresponding to different models. Based on the analysis, the figures of creep stress and strain varying with load properties were plotted. Then, the stress and strain of pipes with local wall thinning affected by load properties were discussed. The results indicate that creep stress and creep strain increase with load properties. The variation laws have been summarized. The research results can provide the possibility on safety assessment and structure integrity analysis of the pipe with local wall thinning at high temperature effectively.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volumes 704-705)
• Pages: 1304-1309
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.704-705.1304
• Online since: December 2011
• Authors: Ji Lin Xue, Chang Yu Zhou, Jian Peng
• Keywords: Creep, Finite Element Analysis (FEA), High-Temperature, Load Properties, Local Wall Thinning, Stress Analysis

References

[1] Y. Lu, S.D. Jing, L.H. Han, C.D. Liu. Chemical machinery, 25(1998), pp.112-115 (in Chinese).

[2] D.R.H. Jones. Engineering failure analysis, 11(2004), pp.873-893.

[3] R5. Procedure R5, Issue 2. Gloucester: Nuclear Electric Ltd, (1997).

[4] British Standards BS 7910: 1999, London: BSI, (1999).

[5] B. Drubay, D. Moulin, C. Faidy, S. Bhandari. ASME PVP266. New York: ASME, (1993), pp.113-118.

[6] Z.X. Duan, S.M. Shen. Nuclear Power Engineering, 28(2007), pp.77-91 (in Chinese).

[7] L.H. Han, S.Y. He, Y.P. Wang, C.D. Liu. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 76 (1996), pp.539-542.

[8] Y.J. Kim, B.G. Son. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping , 81(2004), pp.897-906.

[9] S.H. Ahn, K.W. Nam, K. Takahashi, K. i Ando. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 236 (2006), p.140–155.

[10] GB/T 19624-2004. (2004) (in Chinese).

[11] ANSI/ASME B31G-1991. New York.

[12] C.Y. Zhou, J.L. Xue, G.D. Zhang. Journal of Pressure Equipment and Systems, 6(2008), pp.41-44.

[13] J.L. Xue, C.Y. Zhou, X.H. He, J.W. Sheng. The 12th International Conference on Pressure Vessel and Technology, Jeju Island, KOREA(2009), pp.529-537.

[14] ABAQUS User's manual. Hibbitt, Karlson and Sorensen, Inc; (2001).

[15] T. H. Hyde, W. Sun. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 79(2002), pp.331-339.

[16] T. H. Hyde, A. A. Becker, W. Sun, A. Yaghi, J. A. Williams, S. Concari. 5th International Conference on Mechanics and Materials in Design, Porto-Portugal: University of Porto, (2006).