Crack Growth Behavior in ATI 718Plus® Alloy

Article Preview

Abstract:

ATI 718Plus® alloy is a new, cast and wrought, Ni-base superalloy with a maximum use temperature approximately 55°C higher than alloy 718. The mechanical properties have been well characterized by turbine engine OEM’s and the alloy has been specified for use as static components and blades in gas turbine engines. Broader use of ATI 718Plus alloy in engine disk applications requires detailed understanding of the damage tolerance under creep and cyclic loading conditions. The results of a large testing program to evaluate the crack growth behavior of ATI 718Plus alloy at temperatures between 649°C and 704°C under conditions of fatigue, dwell-fatigue, and creep are presented. Crack growth rates in ATI 718Plus alloy in this temperature range are lower than alloy 718 and comparable to Waspaloy under non-dwell-fatigue conditions, and comparable to alloy 720 in dwell-fatigue tests.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 706-709)

Pages:

2428-2433

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. L. Kennedy, Proc. of Superalloys 718, 625, 706 and Derivatives, (2005) p.1.

Google Scholar

[2] X. Xie et al.; Proc. of Superalloys 718, 625, 706 and Derivatives (2005) p.179.

Google Scholar

[3] W. D. Cao and R. L. Kennedy; Proc. of Superalloys 2004 (2004) p.91.

Google Scholar

[4] W. D. Cao; Proc. of Superalloys 718, 625, 706 and Derivatives (2005) p.165.

Google Scholar

[5] W. D. Cao; Proc. of Superalloys 2008 (2008) p.789.

Google Scholar

[6] J. Tsang et al.; Mater. High Temp., Vol. 27 (2010) p.79.

Google Scholar

[7] C. Stotter et al.; Int. J. Mat. Res.; Vol. 99 (2008) p.376.

Google Scholar

[8] E. T. McDevitt and J. Bentley; Supplemental Proceedings: Vol. 1: Materials for High Temperature Applications: Next Generation Superalloys and Beyond; TMS Annual Meeting (2009).

Google Scholar

[9] R. M. Kearsey et al.; Proc. of Superalloy 718 and Derivatives (2010) p.781.

Google Scholar

[10] L. S. Fu; Eng. Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 13 (1980) p.307.

Google Scholar

[11] E. T. McDevitt; Unpublished research (2009).

Google Scholar

[12] S. Floreen; Met. Trans. A, Vol. 6A (1975) p.1741.

Google Scholar

[13] K. Sadananda and P. Shahinian; Met. Trans. A, Vol. 8A (1977) p.439.

Google Scholar

[14] E. T. McDevitt; Proc. of Superalloy 718 and Derivatives (2010) p.307.

Google Scholar

[15] M. J. Caton and S. K. Jha; Int. J. of Fatigue, Vol. 32 (2010) p.1461.

Google Scholar

[16] A. H. Rosenberger; Proc. Of Superalloys 2004 (2004) p.233.

Google Scholar

[17] G. Onofrio et al.; Int. J. Of Fatigue, Vol 23 (2001) p.887.

Google Scholar

[18] J. Z. Xie; Proc. of Superalloys 718, 625, and Various Derivatives, (1991) p.491.

Google Scholar

[19] T. M. Pollock and S. Tin; J. of Propulsion and Power, Vol 22, No. 2 (2006) p.361.

Google Scholar