Effect of Water Cooling on Grain Structures and General Mechanical Properties of 2219-T6 Friction Stir Welded Joint

Article Preview

Abstract:

Regarding the friction stir welding (FSW) of heat–treatable aluminum alloys, although the thermal flow does not cause any material fusion, it can still deteriorate the local mechanical properties of the joints due to coarsening or dissolution of the strengthening precipitates. Therefore, it is of significance and possible to improve the joint properties by controlling the temperature level. For this purpose, a 2219-T6 aluminum alloy was underwater friction stir welded in the present study, and the temperature histories, grain structures and the general mechanical properties of the joints were investigated in order to illuminate the effect of water cooling. The results reveal that the water cooling action can effectively control the temperature level in the joint. The recrystallized grains in the weld nugget zone (WNZ) are significantly refined under the water cooling effect. The mechanical analysis indicates that the tensile strength of the joint can be improved by 6% through the external water cooling action. Additionally, the underwater joint also exhibits superior bend and impact properties to the normal joint, indicating the positive effect of water cooling on the general mechanical properties of the joints.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 706-709)

Pages:

2986-2991

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R.S. Mishra and Z.Y. Ma: Mater. Sci. Eng. R Vol. 50 (2005), pp.1-78.

Google Scholar

[2] J.Q. Su, T.W. Nelson, R. Mishra and M. Mahoney: Acta Mater. Vol. 51 (2003), pp.713-729.

Google Scholar

[3] R.W. Fonda and J.F. Bingert: Metall. Mater. Trans. A Vol. 35 (2004), pp.1487-1499.

Google Scholar

[4] Y.C. Chen, J.C. Feng and H.J. Liu: Mater. Charact. Vol. 60 (2009), pp.476-481.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Cabibbo, H.J. McQueen, E. Evangelista, S. Spigarelli, M. Di Paola and A. Falchero: Mater. Sci. Eng. A Vol. 460-461 (2007), pp.86-94.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.01.022

Google Scholar

[6] M.W. Mahoney, C.G. Rhodes, J.G. Flintoff, R.A. Spurling and W.H. Bingel: Metall. Mater. Trans. A Vol. 29 (1998), p.1955-(1964).

DOI: 10.1007/s11661-998-0021-5

Google Scholar

[7] A. Denquin, D. Allehaux, M.H. Campagnac and G. Lapasset: Mater. Sci. Forum Vol. 402 (2002), pp.1199-1204.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.396-402.1199

Google Scholar

[8] M.J. Starink, A. Seschamps and S.C. Wang: Scripta Mater. Vol. 58 (2008), pp.377-382.

Google Scholar

[9] S. Benavides, Y. Li, L.E. Murr, D. Brown and J.C. McClure: Scripta Mater. Vol. 41 (1999), pp.809-815.

Google Scholar

[10] L. Fratini, G. Buffa and R. Shivpuri: Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. Vol. 10 (2008), pp.42-53.

Google Scholar

[11] L. Fratini, G. Buffa and R. Shivpuri: Acta Mater. Vol. 58 (2010), p.2056-(2067).

Google Scholar

[12] H.J. Liu, H.J. Zhang, Y.X. Huang and L. Yu: Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China Vol. 20 (2010), pp.1387-1391.

Google Scholar