Orientation Relationships between Directionally Grown Precipitates and their Parent Phases in Steels

Abstract:

There are four prominent orientation relationships (ORs) between directionally grown precipitates and their parent phases in steel. They are ORs between ferrite precipitate and parent austenite (the Kurdjumov and Sachs OR), between orthorhombic cementite precipitate and parent austenite (the Pitsch OR), between cementite precipitate and parent ferrite (the Bagaryatski OR) and between hexagonal molybdenum carbide precipitate and parent ferrite (the Dyson et al. OR). The directed precipitation occurs at low transformation temperatures. The ORs have been explained by the directed growth model. The solid phase transformation of a metastable phase into a stable phase needs the activation energy. The energy is usually supplied in the form of thermal energy. When the nucleation takes place, the strain energy may develop in the stable nucleus and the metastable matrix. The strain energy can result from a difference in density between the nucleus and matrix and the lattice mismatch along the nucleus:matrix interface. The fundamental concept of the model is that the maximum growth rate of precipitate is along the direction that generates the maximum strain energy and the interface energy is minimized. The four ORs are determined, based on the concept, such that the mismatch along the interface between the minimum shear modulus planes of precipitate and its parent phase that are parallel to the maximum Young’s modulus direction of the precipitate is minimized.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volumes 706-709)
• Pages: 61-68
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.706-709.61
• Online since: January 2012
• Authors: Dong Nyung Lee, Heung Nam Han
• Keywords: Bagaryatski, Dyson et al., Kurdjumov, Orientation Relationship, Pitsch, Sachs

References

[1] F.R.N. Nabarro, Proc. Phys. Soc. 52 (1940) 90.

[2] F. Laszlo, J. Iron. Steel. Inst. 5 (1950) 164.

[3] J.D. Eshelby, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 241 (1957) 376.

[4] D.M. Barnett, J.K. Lee, H.I. Aaronson, K.C. Russell, Scripta Metall. 8 (1974) 1447.

[5] J.K. Lee, D.M. Barnett, H.I. Aaronson, Metall. Trans. A8 (1977) 963.

[6] E. Kröner, Acta Metall. 2 (1954) 302.

[7] Lee JK, Johnson WC. Acta Metall 1978; 26: 541.

[8] D.N. Lee, H.N. Han, Mater. Sci. Forum, in press.

[9] S.B. Lee, D. -K. Choi, D.N. Lee, J. Appl. Phys. 98 (2005) 114911.

[10] D.N. Lee, Adv. Mater. Res. 26-28 (2007) 623.

[11] K.M. Wu, Y. Inagawa, M. Enomoto, Mater. Charact. 52 (2004) 121.

[12] M. Enomoto, K.M. Wu, Y. Inagawa, T. Murakami, S. Nanba, ISIJ Int. 45 (2005) 756.

[13] T. Furuhara, H. Kawata, S. Morito, G. Miyamoto, T. Maki, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 39 (2008) 1003.

[14] W. Pitsch, Acta Metall. 10 (1962) 897.

[15] K.O.E. Henriksson, K. Nortlund, Phys. Rev. B79 (2009) 144107.

[16] K. Momma, F. Izumi, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 41 (2008) 653.

[17] H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia, R.W.K. Honeycombe, Steels: Microstructure and Properties, third ed., Butterworth-Heineman, 2006, p.134.

[18] K.A. Ridal, A.G. Quarrell, J. Iron. Steel. Inst. 200 (1962) 359.

[19] D.J. Dyson, S.K. Keown, D. Raynor, J.A. Whiteman, Acta Met. 14 (1966) 867.

[20] E. Parthé, V. Sadagopan, Acta Cryst. 16 (1963) 2.

[21] A.J.C. Wilson, Structure Reports [R] IUCR. 16 (1952) 47.

[22] E.V. Clougherty, K.H. Lothrop, J.A. Kafalas, Nature 191 (1961) 1194.

[23] H. Liu, J. Zhu, Z. Lai, R. Zhao, D. He, Scr. Mater. 60 (2009) 949.